On the public citation graph

Save this Honorable Court: Shaping Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court Off the Bench

https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918801563
0 signed · 77 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.4220080105openalex-snapshot
Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90062-2openalex-snapshot
Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-3071-9.50016-7openalex-snapshot
Implications of Commodity Theory for Value Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.09.005openalex-snapshot
Does civility pay?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613722openalex-snapshot
Stealth Democracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511750632openalex-snapshot
Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818691openalex-snapshot
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511921452openalex-snapshot
Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511977480openalex-snapshot
Justices and Journalists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316480366openalex-snapshot
U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and their Audiences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2017.41openalex-snapshot
Comments from the New Editor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402000187openalex-snapshot
Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051452openalex-snapshot
The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090793openalex-snapshot
Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090884openalex-snapshot
Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381610000459openalex-snapshot
“An Appeal to the People”: Public Opinion and Congressional Support for the Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2015.19openalex-snapshot
The Generalizability of Survey Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108openalex-snapshot
The ASA Statement on p -Values: Context, Process, and Purpose
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2016.1151387openalex-snapshot
A Well-Traveled Lot: A Research Note on Judicial Travel by U.S. Supreme Court Justices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12150openalex-snapshot
Chief Justice Roberts's Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court's Legitimacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2006.00518.xopenalex-snapshot
Shattering the Myth of Legality: The Impact of the Media's Framing of Supreme Court Procedures on Perceptions of Fairness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00271.xopenalex-snapshot
Presidential Capital and the Supreme Court Confirmation Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.xopenalex-snapshot
Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00290.xopenalex-snapshot
Mechanism of Motivated Reasoning? Analogical Perception in Discrimination Disputes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00411.xopenalex-snapshot
The Separation of Powers, Court Curbing, and Judicial Legitimacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00485.xopenalex-snapshot
How Public Opinion Constrains the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12104openalex-snapshot
Losing, but Accepting: Legitimacy, Positivity Theory, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12219openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Public Sentiment on Supreme Court Opinion Clarity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546openalex-snapshot
The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038openalex-snapshot
Psychological Perspectives on Legitimacy and Legitimation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622072openalex-snapshot
Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1301_2openalex-snapshot
The Psychology of Unavailability: Explaining Scarcity and Cost Effects on Value
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691188041openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400827541openalex-snapshot
Judges and Their Audiences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830602openalex-snapshot
Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2109207openalex-snapshot
Elements of Judicial Strategy.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/794870openalex-snapshot
The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjk2w91openalex-snapshot
How Judges Think
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-7openalex-snapshot
Historical Development of Supreme Court Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691527-9openalex-snapshot
U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717104openalex-snapshot
Social Psychology and Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226726687.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Hollow Hope

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4557072openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09848-5openalex-snapshot
Televised Oral Arguments and Judicial Legitimacy: An Initial Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09966-2openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Descriptive Representation on Support for Judicial Nominees and the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2023.14openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Oral Argument Attendance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2023.15openalex-snapshot
A Matter of Opinion? How Unexpected Opinion Authors Influence Support for Supreme Court Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.10openalex-snapshot
Executives Strike Back: Political Benefits of Sanctioning the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.17openalex-snapshot
Framing the Judiciary: Effects of Partisan, Procedural, and Populist Frames on Apex Court Perceptions in Czechia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2025.1openalex-snapshot
Effective Judicial Communication and Trust in the Judiciary
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.38openalex-snapshot
An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Supreme Court Justices’ Public Rhetoric on Perceptions of Judicial Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2023.69openalex-snapshot
Are You Talking to Me? How Ideological and Gender Characteristics Moderate the Effect of Legitimizing Rhetoric on SCOTUS Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x25100500openalex-snapshot
“You Reached Out to Me to Help”: Female Attorneys, Anti-Feminist Causes, and Their Effects on Symbolic Representation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/xps.2026.10030openalex-snapshot
Do the Audio and Video from Public Hearings Impact High Court Legitimacy?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-024-00524-yopenalex-snapshot
Effects of public concerns on favorable attitudes to pandemic containment policies: a two-wave panel survey study in Hong Kong
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2019.1672597openalex-snapshot
Strategic Sensationalism: Why Justices Use Emotional Appeals in Supreme Court Opinions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2022.2084002openalex-snapshot
Ready for Their Close-Up? Ideological Cues and Strategic Televising in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2022.2112327openalex-snapshot
Snooze or Snub? How the Public Reacts to Judicial Attendance at the State of the Union
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2025.2467905openalex-snapshot
The Political Court: Newspaper Coverage, Appointment Politics, and Public Support of the United States Supreme Court, 1980–2023
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2340513openalex-snapshot
It All Begins With a Name: Examining News During the Ketanji Brown Jackson Judicial Nomination
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2024.2431808openalex-snapshot
A plea for democratic resistance: Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s demosprudence through public address
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edaa013openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions: The Case of the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12820openalex-snapshot
Public Views of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Aftermath of the Kavanaugh Confirmation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13305openalex-snapshot
How low can we go: Court approval effects on public opinion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221114049openalex-snapshot
Media Attention and Deliberation on the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261458222openalex-snapshot
No Shelter in Unanimity: The Limits of Consensus for Supreme Court Legitimacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261465675openalex-snapshot
Depictions of Partisan Bias at Oral Argument and Public Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14614456241281142openalex-snapshot
Judicial self fashioning: Rhetorical performance in Supreme Court opinions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x211064299openalex-snapshot
Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x241263080openalex-snapshot
Friendship is Rare: The Influence of Off-Bench Friendships on Support for the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211053067openalex-snapshot
No home court advantage: The trump impeachment trial and attitudes toward the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20531680231180357openalex-snapshot
Public campaign financing’s effects on judicial legitimacy: Evidence from a survey experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20531680241263709openalex-snapshot
Did you hear about Clarence Thomas? Measuring public attention toward the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2755323x261460504openalex-snapshot
Using Large Language Models to Measure the Ideology of Supreme Court Justices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.64628/aai.uhqaadd9sopenalex-snapshot
Supreme Court heads into uncharted, dangerous territory as it considers Trump insurrection case
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/64a5950azc4d8z462bzae95z718cea616d03openalex-snapshot
La transparence de la justice constitutionnelle : une étude de droit comparé (France, Brésil, États-Unis)
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.