On the public citation graph

Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090884
0 signed · 208 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118795openalex-snapshot
An econometric analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's certiorari decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0362-3319(97)90015-xopenalex-snapshot
Error-correction on the U.S. Supreme Court: A view from the clerks' memos
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.3.549openalex-snapshot
Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/6.special_issue.1openalex-snapshot
Congressional Influence on Bureaucracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm024openalex-snapshot
The Judicial Common Space
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/10.2.134openalex-snapshot
Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00262.xopenalex-snapshot
The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00260.xopenalex-snapshot
Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00287.xopenalex-snapshot
Agenda Control, the Median Justice, and the Majority Opinion on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00121.xopenalex-snapshot
Amici Curiae and Dissensus on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2001.tb00185.xopenalex-snapshot
What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the “Legal Model” of Judicial Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692800012001004openalex-snapshot
Confirmation Dynamics: A Model of Presidential Appointments to Independent Agencies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692893005001002openalex-snapshot
Deference or Preference?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400307openalex-snapshot
Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900301openalex-snapshot
Comparing GEE and Robust Standard Errors for Conditionally Dependent Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299004300208openalex-snapshot
Strategies in Certiorari Voting On the United States Supreme Court: a Reevaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700306openalex-snapshot
Policy Legitimacy and the Supreme Court: The Sources and Contexts of Legitimation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x02030003001openalex-snapshot
Aggressive Grants by Affirm-Minded Justices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1288290openalex-snapshot
Case Selection in the United States Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1961752openalex-snapshot
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111547openalex-snapshot
"Freshman Effects" for Supreme Court Justices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111738openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Stare Decisis on the Votes of United States Supreme Court Justices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111740openalex-snapshot
The Norm of Stare Decisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2129740openalex-snapshot
Concern for Policy Outputs as a Cue for Supreme Court Decisions on Certiorari
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2129784openalex-snapshot
The New Certiorari Game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2960195openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3052953openalex-snapshot
The Decision to Grant or Deny Certiorari: Further Consideration of Cue Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3234137openalex-snapshot
The Decision to Grant Certiorari as an Indicator to Decision "On the Merits"
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zrs3openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-5347openalex-snapshot
The puzzle of judicial behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.38-4727openalex-snapshot
Crafting law on the Supreme Court: the collegial game
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6706openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-1219openalex-snapshot
Strategic behavior and policy choice on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-1800openalex-snapshot
Courtiers of the Marble Palace: the rise and influence of the Supreme Court law clerk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-7122openalex-snapshot
Sorcerers' apprentices: 100 years of law clerks at the United States Supreme Court

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1443264openalex-extracted
Cognition, Motivation, and Supreme Court Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568386openalex-extracted
Consider the Source (and the Message): Supreme Court Justices and Strategic Audits of Lower Court Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568387openalex-extracted
Congressional Constraints and Tactical Supreme Court Maneuvers: Calling for the Views of the United States Solicitor General
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1693908openalex-extracted
Independence and Interdependence: Lessons from the Hive
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1931714openalex-extracted
The Policy Consequences of Allowing Retired Justices to Serve on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2467934openalex-extracted
Judging, Sooner or Later: A Study of Decision Timing in Taiwan's Constitutional Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2553279openalex-extracted
A Topic Model Approach to Studying Agenda Formation for the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2591240openalex-extracted
Majoritarian Judicial Review: The Case of Taiwan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2702144openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15551-7_3openalex-snapshot
Judicial Independence: Evidence from the Philippine Supreme Court (1970–2003)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9522-zopenalex-snapshot
Discretionary review and undesired cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-023-09905-7openalex-snapshot
Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2018.12.009openalex-snapshot
Friends with benefits: Case significance, amicus curiae, and agenda setting on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009049030openalex-snapshot
The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781009394352openalex-snapshot
The Haves and Have-Nots in Supreme Court Representation and Participation, 2016 to 2021
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.21openalex-snapshot
The Downstream Effects of Certiorari: Agenda-Setting, Amicus Briefs, and Opinion Writing on the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2025.3openalex-snapshot
When the Courtiers Return to the Marble Palace: The Impact of U.S. Supreme Court Lawyers’ Prior Appellate Clerkship Experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10020openalex-snapshot
Lower Court Disagreements as Cues for Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10025openalex-snapshot
Merits Positions and Supreme Court Voting on Stays and Injunctions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10026openalex-snapshot
Supply-Side Dynamics of the US Supreme Court Docket: The Spatial-Temporal Landscape of Writ of Cert Petitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2015.36openalex-snapshot
What To Do About Atheoretic Lags
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2021.69openalex-snapshot
Justice-level heterogeneity in certiorari voting: US Supreme Court October terms 1939, 1968, and 1982
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055425101160openalex-snapshot
The Path of Law: Legal Uncertainty and Issues of First Impression in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381613001035openalex-snapshot
The Swing Justice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1352325218000149openalex-snapshot
NONPARTY PARTICIPATION AS A (PARTIAL) REMEDY TO PROCEDURALIST CONCERNS OVER JUDICIAL REVIEW
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592720003606openalex-snapshot
Chevron, State Farm, and the Impact of Judicial Doctrine on Bureaucratic Policymaking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x26100816openalex-snapshot
Insufficient Intersectionality: The Limits of Federal Wage Discrimination Lawsuits in the 21st Century
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2009.10767936openalex-snapshot
Analyzing the Reliability of Supreme Court Justices' Agenda-Setting Records
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2013.868281openalex-snapshot
Calling in the Reserves: Judicial Replacements on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2014.990344openalex-snapshot
Assessing the Anecdotes: Amicus Curiae, Legal Rules, and the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2015.1067156openalex-snapshot
Strategic Behavior and Variation in the Supreme Court's Caseload Over Time
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2016.1204969openalex-snapshot
The Influence of the Solicitor General as Amicus Curiae on the Roberts Court, 2005–2014: A Research Note
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2020.1856738openalex-snapshot
Consensus Decision Making: A Comparative Analysis of Judging and Judicial Deliberations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2021.1881666openalex-snapshot
Judges’ Race and the Voting Rights Act: Perceived Expertise in Three-Judge District Court Panels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1625301openalex-snapshot
Judging government economic performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/668482openalex-snapshot
How the Supreme Court Alters Opinion Language to Evade Congressional Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/677114openalex-snapshot
On Courts and Pocketbooks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/681059openalex-snapshot
Legal Constraint in the US Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/681437openalex-snapshot
Judicial Majoritarianism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/688395openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Justices’ Loyalty to the President
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/688442openalex-snapshot
Learning in the Judicial Hierarchy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/690086openalex-snapshot
Criticism from Below
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/703407openalex-snapshot
Judicial Choice among Cases for Certiorari
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/704213openalex-snapshot
Comment on “Judicial Choice among Cases for Certiorari”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/709911openalex-snapshot
Deferring, Deliberating, or Dodging Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/713404openalex-snapshot
Agenda Setting and Attention to Precedent in the US Federal Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/714086openalex-snapshot
A Separation-of-Powers Approach to the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Caseload
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/714888openalex-snapshot
On Estimating Personality Traits of US Supreme Court Justices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/715464openalex-snapshot
Considerations in Personality Measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/730741openalex-snapshot
The “Odd Party Out” Theory of Certiorari
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/733189openalex-snapshot
The Judging Game
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jla/3.1.101openalex-snapshot
Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewaa027openalex-snapshot
Measuring Supreme Court Case Complexity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewq002openalex-snapshot
US Supreme Court Agenda Setting and the Role of Litigant Status
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlae025openalex-snapshot
Dynamic factor models for binary data in circular spaces: an application to the US Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.001.0001openalex-snapshot
A Court of Specialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.002.0004openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.002.0005openalex-snapshot
Preface
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Introduction: The Supreme Court’s Place in UK Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Key Concepts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Who Gets Heard? Permission to Appeal Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Panel Size
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Panel Formation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Who Writes?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Who Dissents?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Political Patterns of Dissent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Who Wins?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509234.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Conclusions: Specialism and the Primacy of the Legal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Elevator Effect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.002.0004openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.002.0007openalex-snapshot
List of Figures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.002.0008openalex-snapshot
List of Tables
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0001openalex-snapshot
The Missing Link: The Importance of Collegiality for Judicial Behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Understanding Collegiality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Interpersonal Contact and Publicizing Disagreement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Why Does Collegiality Matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0005openalex-snapshot
The Supreme Court: From the Boarding House to the Marble Temple
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0006openalex-snapshot
The Lunchroom Politics of Intercourt Relations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Collegiality and the Language of Dissent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0008openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Relationships on the Use of Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197625408.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Taking Collegiality Seriously in Designing and Studying Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Aging and the Federal Circuit Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.002.0004openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0002openalex-snapshot
The Neuroscience behind Cognitive Aging
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0003openalex-snapshot
How Cognitive Aging Applies to Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Opinion Crafting and Cognitive Aging
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Opinion Style
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Aging, Law Clerks, and Party Briefs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Aging, Opinion Quality, and the Diffusion of Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Aging and Following Supreme Court Precedent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0009openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Aging and Panel Composition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Public Attitudes toward Aged Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Public Support for Judicial Reforms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197747025.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Conclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Selective Publication in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.002.0003openalex-snapshot
Copyright Page
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.002.0006openalex-snapshot
Figures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.002.0007openalex-snapshot
Tables
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.002.0008openalex-snapshot
Dedication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.002.0010openalex-snapshot
Table of Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0001openalex-snapshot
The Rise of Invisible Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Publication Policies and Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Visible Rules, Invisible Norms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Invisible Losers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Invisible Work
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0006openalex-snapshot
What Comes Next? Publication and Further Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197770085.003.0007openalex-snapshot
The Future of Selective Publication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192868282.013.27openalex-snapshot
Macro-Level Pluralism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.25openalex-snapshot
Agenda Setting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pju027openalex-snapshot
Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12653openalex-snapshot
Measuring Agenda Setting in Interactive Political Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00432.xopenalex-snapshot
Has Legal Realism Damaged the Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00504.xopenalex-snapshot
Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00438.xopenalex-snapshot
The Separation of Powers and Supreme Court Agenda Setting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00606.xopenalex-snapshot
Looking Back to Move Forward: Quantifying Policy Predictions in Political Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2012.00933.xopenalex-snapshot
Selecting the Select Few: The Discuss List and the U.S. Supreme Court's Agenda‐Setting Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12187openalex-snapshot
The Politics of Selecting Chevron Deference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12224openalex-snapshot
Legal Uniformity in American Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12244openalex-snapshot
Separate Opinion Writing Under Mandatory Appellate Jurisdiction: Three‐Judge District Court Panels and the Voting Rights Act
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.70036openalex-snapshot
Ideology and Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12090openalex-snapshot
Deciding Not to Decide: The Politics of Recusals on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lasr.12165openalex-snapshot
Seasonal Affective Disorder: Clerk Training and the Success of Supreme Court Certiorari Petitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12036openalex-snapshot
Punctuated Equilibrium and the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12775openalex-snapshot
The Sum of its Parts: How Supreme Court Justices Disparately Shape Attention to Their Opinions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70090openalex-snapshot
US Supreme Court Institutional Integrity in Case Selection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152921openalex-snapshot
The Strategic Analysis of Judicial Decisions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546openalex-snapshot
The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.2.2022.tde-19102022-092254openalex-snapshot
A construção da pauta do Supremo Tribunal Federal: quem, o quê, e como
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0951629819875519openalex-snapshot
Presidential action and the Supreme Court: The case of signing statements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1043463114523713openalex-snapshot
Independence and interdependence: Lessons from the hive
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910388185openalex-snapshot
Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910395324openalex-snapshot
Consider the Source (and the Message)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912912469729openalex-snapshot
Toward an Actor-Based Measure of Supreme Court Case Salience
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912913482757openalex-snapshot
Trying to Get What You Want
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918801563openalex-snapshot
Save this Honorable Court: Shaping Public Perceptions of the Supreme Court Off the Bench
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1065912920948138openalex-snapshot
TRENDS: The Influence of Personalized Knowledge at the Supreme Court: How (Some) Former Law Clerks Have the Inside Track
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129211029723openalex-snapshot
TRENDS: The Geography of Law: Understanding the Origin of State and Federal Redistricting Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221114049openalex-snapshot
Media Attention and Deliberation on the Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129231164947openalex-snapshot
Congressional Constraint? The Review of In Absentia Immigration Removal Orders in Federal Circuit Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129261415628openalex-snapshot
R-E-S-P-E-C-T: An Analysis of the Norm of Respectful Dissent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532440014567858openalex-snapshot
Nominating Commissions, Judicial Retention, and Forward-Looking Behavior on State Supreme Courts: An Empirical Examination of Selection and Retention Methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x11401814openalex-snapshot
The Role of Law Clerks in the U.S. Supreme Court’s Agenda-Setting Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x14531482openalex-snapshot
Explaining the (Non)Occurrence of Equal Divisions on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x16628640openalex-snapshot
Sound the Alarm? Judicial Decisions Regarding Publication and Dissent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x17692519openalex-snapshot
How Supreme Court Justices Supervise Ideologically Distant States
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x18822312openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion and Setting the Agenda on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/21674795241265008openalex-snapshot
“You Don’t Want Us to Solve This”: Agenda Setting in the Federal Hearings on Name, Image, and Likeness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2755323x261460504openalex-snapshot
Using Large Language Models to Measure the Ideology of Supreme Court Justices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18504/pl2447-006-2016openalex-snapshot
El tribunal electoral y los gastos de los partidos políticos en México
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568381openalex-snapshot
Solicitor General Influence and Agenda Setting on the United States Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1568392openalex-snapshot
An Alternative Perspective on Supreme Court Agenda Setting in a System of Shared Powers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1738309openalex-snapshot
Predicting Drift on Politically Insulated Institutions: A Study of Ideological Drift on the United States Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2109497openalex-snapshot
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court Revisited
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2241686openalex-snapshot
Opposite Side of the Same Agenda Setting Coin? DIGs in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2623304openalex-snapshot
Evolution of Conflict in the Courts of Appeals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2993200openalex-snapshot
Deferring, Deliberating, or Dodging Review? Examining the Mechanisms Behind Panel Effects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3537876openalex-snapshot
The 'Odd Party Out' Theory of Certiorari
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5552078openalex-snapshot
Lower Court Dissent and Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3138/utlj.2018-0060openalex-snapshot
How institutions structure judicial behaviour: An analysis of Alarie and Green’s Commitment and Cooperation on High Courts: A Cross-Country Examination of Institutional Constraints on Judges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33790/jpspo1100122openalex-snapshot
Considering The Costs of Circuit Conflict
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47749/t/unicamp.2013.918094openalex-snapshot
O Supremo Tribunal Federal e os tratados internacionais de direitos humanos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.57709/14263116openalex-snapshot
Public Attention and Certiorari: The Impact of Public Attention on Supreme Court Petitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/64a5950azc4d8z462bzae95z718cea616d03openalex-snapshot
La transparence de la justice constitutionnelle : une étude de droit comparé (France, Brésil, États-Unis)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/94cba66fzf1a1z4ee0zb923z387078b8a4fcopenalex-snapshot
La fabbrica del pluralismo. Il governo della conflittualità sociale da parte della Corte costituzionale alla luce delle più recenti modifiche del suo processo
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7476/9788577982332openalex-snapshot
Política e direito na suprema corte norte-americana: debates teóricos e estudos de caso
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7476/9788577982332.0002openalex-snapshot
Abordagens teóricas para o estudo das decisões da suprema corte
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7476/9788577982332.0006openalex-snapshot
Processo decisório na suprema corte e no Supremo Tribunal Federal
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7936/k70k26nvopenalex-snapshot
Essays on the Role of Law in Judicial Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7936/k7jd4twfopenalex-snapshot
The Role of the U.S. Courts of Appeals in Legal Development: An Empirical Analysis
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.