On the public citation graph
Framing Effects on Public Opinion about Nanotechnology
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository
metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is
labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not
evidence of absence.
1 of the 46 references listed on this page is in the Retraction Watch database as retracted (export 2026-10-28): 10.1126/science.285.5426.384 (notice 2000-06-09).
Dataset join, best-effort; this page does not check the publisher record.
Retraction Watch data via Crossref Labs, used with credit; OpenCitations Index (CC0) and Meta (CC BY 4.0);
dataset doi:10.7910/DVN/WT8VOA (CC BY 4.0).
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated
CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00109openalex-snapshotFraming Effects on Personal Opinion and Perception of Public Opinion: The Cases of Physician–Assisted Suicide and Social Security
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7021openalex-snapshotManufactured Nanomaterials (Fullerenes, C60) Induce Oxidative Stress in the Brain of Juvenile Largemouth Bass
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2669312openalex-snapshotNews Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: Politically Knowledgeable Citizens Are Guided by a Trusted Source
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4779026openalex-extractedHow Do People Form Opinions Toward Generative Ai with Limited Experience? — Predicting Public Support for Generative Ai Technology Development and Regulation Using Technology Readiness, Media Attention, and Risk-Benefit Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1971openalex-snapshotDefusing environmental activism through scientific greening: Government framing strategy and its effects in China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.1285openalex-snapshotThe influence of information on individuals' reactions to CCS technologies: results from experimental online survey research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34568-6_1openalex-snapshotUnderstanding Public Benefit and Risk Perceptions Through Psychological and Sociological Aspects for Sustainable Nanotechnology Development in Malaysia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-010-0038-8openalex-snapshotMaking sense of policy choices: understanding the roles of value predispositions, mass media, and cognitive processing in public attitudes toward nanotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-011-0582-xopenalex-snapshotPublic understanding of science and the perception of nanotechnology: the roles of interest in science, methodological knowledge, epistemological beliefs, and beliefs about science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-015-3036-zopenalex-snapshotThe perceived familiarity gap hypothesis: examining how media attention and reflective integration relate to perceived familiarity with nanotechnology in Singapore
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108466openalex-snapshotTechnological optimism surpasses fear of missing out: A multigroup analysis of presumed media influence on generative AI technology adoption across varying levels of technological optimism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1039/9781782626879-00039openalex-snapshotAcceptance of Agri-Food Nanotechnology: Insights from the Evolution of Food Technology, Novel Foods and the Psychology of Novel Food Acceptance and Evidence from Present Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13698570701306807openalex-snapshotToxic effects of nanoparticles and nanomaterials: Implications for public health, risk assessment and the public perception of nanotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2165523openalex-snapshotThe Role of Trust in Communicating Scientific Consensus and the Environmental Benefits of Genetically Engineered Crops: Experimental Evidence of a Backfire Effect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/710308openalex-snapshot“Imperial Folly”: Metrication, Euroskepticism, and Popular Politics in Britain, 1965–1980
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/acc968openalex-snapshotIs everything quantum ‘spooky and weird’? An exploration of popular communication about quantum science and technology in TEDx talks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm017openalex-snapshotTechnology transfer offices as institutional entrepreneurs: the case of Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation and human embryonic stem cells
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12073openalex-snapshotPublic Perceptions of Expert Credibility on Policy Issues: The Role of Expert Framing and Political Worldviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13248openalex-snapshotScience for Policy: A Case Study of Scientific Polarization, Values, and the Framing of Risk and Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13457openalex-snapshotSocial Influence, Risk and Benefit Perceptions, and the Acceptability of Risky Energy Technologies: An Explanatory Model of Nuclear Power Versus Shale Gas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662511417936openalex-snapshotFactors influencing public risk–benefit considerations of nanotechnology: Assessing the effects of mass media, interpersonal communication, and elaborative processing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512453117openalex-snapshotKnowing hydrogen and loving it too? Information provision, cultural predispositions, and support for hydrogen technology among the Dutch
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662516661292openalex-snapshotChanges in the influence of affect and cognition over time on consumer attitude formation toward nanotechnology: A longitudinal survey study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1077699017741090openalex-snapshotAre Photographs Worth More Than a Thousand Words? Examining the Effects of Photographic–Textual and Textual-Only Frames on Public Attitude Toward Nuclear Energy and Nanotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/2190-4715-25-25openalex-snapshotCommunication about scientific uncertainty: how scientists and science journalists deal with uncertainties in nanoparticle research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.2.15191.28324openalex-snapshotFraming Food Health Risks in a Web 2.0 World: Effects of Message Framing and Web 2.0 Interactivity on Attitude Change and Recall of Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18174/282201openalex-snapshotThe views of experts and the public regarding societal preferences for innovation in nanotechnology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.20879/kjjcs.2018.62.4.003openalex-snapshotEffects of the Online Cultural Resonance of News Frames on Public Opinion in Terms of Text Mining and Granger Causality Analysis of News Stories and Comments about the “Kim Young-ran Act”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2147/ijn.s78799openalex-snapshotThe acceptability of nanocarriers for drug delivery in different contexts of use: perceptions of researchers and research trainees in the field of new technologies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22323/2.13040201openalex-snapshotThe Holy Grail of energy? A content and thematic analysis of the presentation of nuclear fusion on the Internet
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.279084openalex-snapshotInvestigation of nanotechnology awareness, interests and attitudes of pre-service Science (Physics, Chemistry and Biology) teachers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.28945/4369openalex-snapshotPositive vs. Negative Framing of Scientific Information on Facebook Using Peripheral Cues: An Eye-Tracking Study of the Credibility Assessment Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315619309openalex-snapshotThe deployment of drone technology in border surveillance, between techno-securitization and challenges to privacy and data protection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.58088/j305-nb09openalex-snapshotFrom Skynet to Siri: an exploration of the nature and effects of media coverage of artificial intelligence
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID:
icsacinstitute.org/submit.