On the public citation graph

A pilot study assessing the similarity between core outcome sets and outcomes included in health technology assessments

https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73647.3
0 signed · 27 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1165openalex-snapshot
Identifying a Core Domain Set to Assess Psoriasis in Clinical Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.627openalex-snapshot
Characteristics of Oncology Clinical Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4851openalex-snapshot
A Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Breast Cancer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.742openalex-snapshot
Bridging the gap: Can International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement standard sets align outcomes accepted for regulatory and health technology assessment decision‐making of oncology medicines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029openalex-snapshot
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019openalex-snapshot
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2017.04.017openalex-snapshot
Identifying What to Measure in Acne Clinical Trials: First Steps towards Development of a Core Outcome Set
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.01.036openalex-snapshot
Which outcomes should we measure in adult epilepsy trials? The views of people with epilepsy and informal carers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62296-5openalex-snapshot
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462319000825openalex-snapshot
The ‘Top 10’ Challenges for Health Technology Assessment: INAHTA Viewpoint
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0266462320000215openalex-snapshot
The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw233openalex-snapshot
Relative effectiveness assessments of oncology medicines for pricing and reimbursement decisions in European countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbr140openalex-snapshot
Content and Quality of 10 000 Controlled Trials in Schizophrenia Over 60 Years
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15335openalex-snapshot
Core outcome sets for prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage: an international Delphi consensus study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212256openalex-snapshot
2017 EULAR recommendations for a core data set to support observational research and clinical care in rheumatoid arthritis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/jaha.115.001767openalex-snapshot
Standardized Outcome Measurement for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Consensus From the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-13-132openalex-snapshot
Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2364-yopenalex-snapshot
A core outcomes set for clinical trials of interventions for young adults with type 1 diabetes: an international, multi-perspective Delphi consensus study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-020-04403-1openalex-snapshot
Core outcome sets through the healthcare ecosystem: the case of type 2 diabetes mellitus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002474openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for observational studies of comorbidity in multiple sclerosis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13139.2openalex-snapshot
Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13139.3openalex-snapshot
Representation of published core outcome sets for research in regulatory guidance: protocol
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002187openalex-snapshot
A Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447openalex-snapshot
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222418openalex-snapshot
Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.016openalex-snapshot
Review finds core outcome set uptake in new studies and systematic reviews needs improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111311openalex-snapshot
Representation of published core outcome sets in practice guidelines
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.