On the public citation graph

Assessing the impact of a research funder’s recommendation to consider core outcome sets

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222418
0 signed · 99 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2728-6openalex-snapshot
How well are the ASAS/OMERACT Core Outcome Sets for Ankylosing Spondylitis implemented in randomized clinical trials? A systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.014openalex-snapshot
Outcome Assessment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Critical Appraisal
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2018.08.018openalex-snapshot
Implementing core outcomes in kidney disease: report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology (SONG) implementation workshop
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30657-8openalex-snapshot
What are funders doing to minimise waste in research?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keu424openalex-snapshot
Outcomes assessed in trials of gout and accordance with OMERACT-proposed domains: a systematic literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000241openalex-snapshot
Reporting of IMMPACT-recommended core outcome domains among trials assessing opioids for chronic non-cancer pain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j2262openalex-snapshot
A methodological approach for assessing the uptake of core outcome sets using ClinicalTrials.gov: findings from a review of randomised controlled trials of rheumatoid arthritis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021198openalex-snapshot
Clinicians’ and researchers’ perspectives on establishing and implementing core outcomes in haemodialysis: semistructured interview study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-324openalex-snapshot
Outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis randomised trials over the last 50 years
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-015-0738-6openalex-snapshot
Core outcome sets and trial registries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1259-7openalex-snapshot
Appraising the uptake and use of recommendations for a common outcome data set for clinical trials: a case study in fall injury prevention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-2493-yopenalex-snapshot
Survey indicated that core outcome set development is increasingly including patients, being conducted internationally and using Delphi surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-018-3052-2openalex-snapshot
Effect of dual-acupoint and single-acupoint electric stimulation on postoperative outcomes in elderly patients subjected to gastrointestinal surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0039-6openalex-snapshot
Including patients in core outcome set development: issues to consider based on three workshops with around 100 international delegates
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011131openalex-snapshot
Driving up the Quality and Relevance of Research Through the Use of Agreed Core Outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002335openalex-snapshot
Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002447openalex-snapshot
Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099111openalex-snapshot
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146444openalex-snapshot
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168403openalex-snapshot
Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190695openalex-snapshot
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: An updated systematic review and involvement of low and middle income countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209869openalex-snapshot
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 4th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225980openalex-snapshot
Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: 5th annual update to a systematic review of core outcome sets for research

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4607622openalex-extracted
Core Outcome Sets and Cochrane Systematic Reviews: Current Trends, Facilitators, and Barriers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/cesm.12038openalex-snapshot
Mechanical ventilation core outcome set uptake in Cochrane systematic reviews: A cross‐sectional study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.70134openalex-snapshot
A common outcome set for trials in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB COS)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03697-xopenalex-snapshot
Assessing uptake of the core outcome set in anxiety disorder clinical trials: a cross-sectional analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.diabres.2023.111085openalex-snapshot
Assessing the uptake of the type 1 diabetes core outcome set in randomized controlled trials: A Cross-Sectional study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2026.06.017openalex-snapshot
A Core Outcome Set for Localized Renal Cell Cancer (L-RCC-COS)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.09.029openalex-snapshot
A systematic review finds Core Outcome Set uptake varies widely across different areas of health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.019openalex-snapshot
More than half of systematic reviews have relevant core outcome sets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.012openalex-snapshot
Use of core outcome sets was low in clinical trials published in major medical journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.12.004openalex-snapshot
In-depth qualitative interviews identified barriers and facilitators that influenced chief investigators’ use of core outcome sets in randomised controlled trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.06.016openalex-snapshot
Review finds core outcome set uptake in new studies and systematic reviews needs improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.011openalex-snapshot
A systematic review of studies reporting the development of core outcome sets for use in routine care
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.019openalex-snapshot
Irish funder guidance increased searching for, and uptake of, core outcome sets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111277openalex-snapshot
Study found increasing use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews and identified facilitators and barriers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111285openalex-snapshot
Using behavioral science to increase core outcome set use in trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.112105openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing use and choice of Core Outcome Sets and Outcome Measurement Instruments in trials of interventions to prevent childhood obesity: a mixed-methods survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2026.01.040openalex-snapshot
Core outcome sets: What are they and why they matter
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2023.08.006openalex-snapshot
The Uptake of the Core Outcome Set for Non-Specific Low Back Pain Clinical Trials is Poor: A Meta-Epidemiological Study of Trial Registrations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2022.11.002openalex-snapshot
The research status and progress of core outcome set in oral health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2021.105348openalex-snapshot
What outcomes should be measured in feline chronic kidney disease treatment trials? Establishing a core outcome set for research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.semnephrol.2024.151549openalex-snapshot
Core Patient-Reported Outcomes for Trials in Nephrology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.07.008openalex-snapshot
Assessing the uptake of core outcome sets in randomized controlled trials for localized prostate cancer: A cross-sectional study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00139-6openalex-snapshot
Common measures in mental health: a joint initiative by funders and journals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaf102openalex-snapshot
Development of a core outcome set for clinical trials targeting interventions aiming to improve adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older people—an international consensus study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000211openalex-snapshot
Completeness and Mismatch of Patient-Important Outcomes After Trauma
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12447openalex-snapshot
The value of core outcome sets in health psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12570openalex-snapshot
Context and the evidence‐based paradigm: The potential for participatory research and systems thinking in oral health
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2022-000183openalex-snapshot
Establishment of a core outcome set for burn care research: development and international consensus
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036562openalex-snapshot
Assessing the relevance and uptake of core outcome sets (an agreed minimum collection of outcomes to measure in research studies) in Cochrane systematic reviews: a review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049981openalex-snapshot
Inclusion of participants from low-income and middle-income countries in core outcome sets development: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2023-045155openalex-snapshot
Core outcome set for intervention research on snakebite envenomation in South Asia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/26320843241270517openalex-snapshot
Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03603-0openalex-snapshot
A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03209-9openalex-snapshot
Continuity of outcome assessment throughout the lifecycle of surgical research: mapping core outcome domains measured in early phase and late phase studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05891-5openalex-snapshot
A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06642-wopenalex-snapshot
Factors associated with reporting of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) core outcome set domains in randomized trials on falls in older people: a citation analysis and correlational study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06973-8openalex-snapshot
A good use of time? Providing evidence for how effort is invested in primary and secondary outcome data collection in trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-023-07388-9openalex-snapshot
Multi-Round versus Real-Time Delphi survey approach for achieving consensus in the COHESION core outcome set: a randomised trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08812-yopenalex-snapshot
Core outcome sets in cancer clinical trials: current status and future opportunities—an EORTC perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09004-4openalex-snapshot
The COMBAT Project: study protocol for the development of a core outcome set for morbidity following surgery in paediatric brain tumour patients
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133688.1openalex-snapshot
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.133688.2openalex-snapshot
Current trends, barriers, and facilitators of use of core outcome sets in Cochrane systematic reviews: Protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73647.1openalex-snapshot
A pilot study assessing the uptake of core outcome sets in health technology assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73647.2openalex-snapshot
A pilot study assessing the similarity between core outcome sets and outcomes included in health technology assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.73647.3openalex-snapshot
A pilot study assessing the similarity between core outcome sets and outcomes included in health technology assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13109.1openalex-snapshot
Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists publishing in major medical journals: Protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13109.2openalex-snapshot
Uptake of core outcome sets by clinical trialists publishing in major medical journals: Protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13510.1openalex-snapshot
Using behavioural science to enhance use of core outcome sets in trials: protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13510.2openalex-snapshot
Using behavioural science to enhance use of core outcome sets in trials: protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13884.1openalex-snapshot
Factors influencing use and choice of Core Outcome Sets and outcome measurement instruments in trials of interventions to prevent childhood obesity: A survey protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12968/jokc.2024.9.4.163openalex-snapshot
Development of a core outcome set for pharmacist interventions in chronic kidney disease
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0002574openalex-snapshot
Awareness and experiences on core outcome set development and use amongst stakeholders from low- and middle- income countries: An online survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0003365openalex-snapshot
Experiences of core outcome set developers on including stakeholders from low- and middle-income countries: An online survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-037747openalex-snapshot
Core Outcome Sets for Medium-Chain Acyl-CoA Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Phenylketonuria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-640850/v1openalex-snapshot
A Survey of Knowledge, Perceptions and Use of Core Outcome Sets among Clinical Trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.98openalex-snapshot
The Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials and Evaluative Studies in Adult Social Care
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13252.1openalex-snapshot
Stage 1 Registered Report. Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13252.2openalex-snapshot
Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review protocol
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14368.r28468openalex-snapshot
Peer Review Report For: Stage 1 Registered Report. Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review [version 1; peer review: 1 approved with reservations]
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14405.r28683openalex-snapshot
Peer Review Report For: Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14405.r29021openalex-snapshot
Peer Review Report For: Interventions for improving the design and conduct of scientific research: A scoping review protocol [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-8325-4851-6openalex-snapshot
Identifying and addressing the impact of exposure to maltreatment and experience in children and child serving systems of care
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1296437openalex-snapshot
Harmonising outcome measurement for child focused domestic abuse interventions. Reflections on the development and implementation of a core outcome set
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103388openalex-snapshot
Standardised Outcome Reporting for the Nutrition Management of Complex Chronic Disease: A Rapid Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14313659openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14313662openalex-snapshot
Additional file 2 of A core outcome set development for a French national prospective study about the effect of mediolateral episiotomy on obstetric anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery (INSTRUMODA)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17292954openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17292957openalex-snapshot
Additional file 2 of A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17292960openalex-snapshot
Additional file 3 of A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.17292963openalex-snapshot
Additional file 4 of A survey of knowledge, perceptions and use of core outcome sets among clinical trialists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20677991openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of Factors associated with reporting of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) core outcome set domains in randomized trials on falls in older people: a citation analysis and correlational study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20677994openalex-snapshot
Additional file 2 of Factors associated with reporting of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) core outcome set domains in randomized trials on falls in older people: a citation analysis and correlational study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20677997openalex-snapshot
Additional file 3 of Factors associated with reporting of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) core outcome set domains in randomized trials on falls in older people: a citation analysis and correlational study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20678000openalex-snapshot
Additional file 4 of Factors associated with reporting of the Prevention of Falls Network Europe (ProFaNE) core outcome set domains in randomized trials on falls in older people: a citation analysis and correlational study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.22607285openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of A good use of time? Providing evidence for how effort is invested in primary and secondary outcome data collection in trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.26605009openalex-snapshot
Additional file 1 of Multi-Round versus Real-Time Delphi survey approach for achieving consensus in the COHESION core outcome set: a randomised trial
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.