On the public citation graph

Cognitive Dissonance, Risk Aversion and the Pretrial Negotiation Impasse

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1129719
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-1834-0_8openalex-extracted
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00122574openalex-extracted
Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90043-4openalex-extracted
Pretrial negotiations with asymmetric information on risk preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(94)90044-2openalex-extracted
Settlement negotiations with two-sided asymmetric information: Model duality, information distribution, and efficiency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00269-6openalex-extracted
Are judges biased by labor market conditions?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8188(99)00011-3openalex-extracted
Who should be worried about asymmetric information in litigation?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(01)00236-0openalex-extracted
Pretrial bargaining with self-serving bias and asymmetric information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1007769703493openalex-extracted
Reasons for Rank-Dependent Utility Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.102.2.269openalex-extracted
Weighing risk and uncertainty.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.102.2.269openalex-extracted
Weighing risk and uncertainty.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/261982openalex-extracted
The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff Victory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467732openalex-extracted
The Selection of Disputes for Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/468113openalex-extracted
Jurors, Judges, and the Mistreatment of Risk by the Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199253906.003.0009openalex-extracted
The Economic Consequences of Cognitive Dissonance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036924openalex-extracted
Measuring the Demand for Litigation: Is the English Rule Really Cheaper?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124openalex-extracted
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/001979391106400403openalex-extracted
Are Judges Sensitive to Economic Conditions? Evidence from Uk Employment Tribunals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.11.1.109openalex-extracted
Explaining Bargaining Impasse: The Role of Self-Serving Biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1628/093245607780181865openalex-extracted
Heuristics and Biases in Bankruptcy Judges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1059080openalex-extracted
Surveys in the Economics of Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1911158openalex-extracted
The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1911515openalex-extracted
Some Stronger Measures of Risk Aversion in the Small and the Large with Applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2171769openalex-extracted
Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2555448openalex-extracted
Litigation and Settlement under Imperfect Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3038236openalex-extracted
Risk Aversion in Quiggin and Yaari's Rank-Order Model of Choice Under Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w4508openalex-extracted
The Selection Hypothesis and the Relationship between Trial and Plaintiff Victory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w6409openalex-extracted
Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2007-1-2-175openalex-extracted
Litigations in Labor Law: Intuitive vs. Reflective Judgements?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011877808366openalex-snapshot
On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467397openalex-snapshot
Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316450765.005openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Dissonance, Ethical Behavior, and Bribery
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.