On the public citation graph
Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation
0 signed · 132 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766928openalex-extracted
Using Computer Vision to Measure Design Similarity: An Application to Us Design Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/smj.281openalex-snapshot
Strategic determinants of decisions not to settle patent litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/smj.70037openalex-snapshot
Location choice in global patent litigation: Does the landscape matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7095-3_8openalex-snapshot
A Game-Theoretic Approach to Legal Settlements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_24openalex-snapshot
Comparative Analysis Of Litigation Systems: An Auction-Theoretic Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-014-9472-xopenalex-snapshot
Patent litigation settlement in Germany: why parties settle during trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-015-9506-zopenalex-snapshot
Inside post-socialist courts: the determinants of adjudicatory outcomes in Slovenian commercial disputes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-023-09777-6openalex-snapshot
Litigation and Settlement Under Loss Aversion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86049-3openalex-snapshot
Law and Economics: Empirical Dimensions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101967openalex-snapshot
Privacy rights in online interactions and litigation dynamics: A social custom view
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2004.01.001openalex-snapshot
Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants—the case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2009.06.004openalex-snapshot
Trial and settlement negotiations between asymmetrically skilled parties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2010.04.003openalex-snapshot
Tort law and probabilistic litigation: How to apply multipliers to address the problem of negative value suits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2011.07.006openalex-snapshot
A unified model of settlement and trial expenditures: The Priest–Klein model extended
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002openalex-snapshot
The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2017.04.002openalex-snapshot
Information and settlement: Empirical evidence on Daubert rulings and settlement rates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2025.106281openalex-snapshot
Notice-and-takedown as dispute resolution: An empirical analysis of GitHub notices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2004.03.006openalex-snapshot
Flexibility, instability and institutional insecurity in Korean labor market
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.06.003openalex-snapshot
Measuring patent assessment quality—Analyzing the degree and kind of (in)consistency in patent offices’ decision making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.05.004openalex-snapshot
Great expectations: Learning the boundaries of design rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104598openalex-snapshot
Standing your ground: Examining the signaling effects of patent litigation in university technology licensing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105309openalex-snapshot
Using computer vision to measure design similarity: An application to design rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121100openalex-snapshot
Cultural proximity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2921(02)00269-6openalex-snapshot
Are judges biased by labor market conditions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00088-8openalex-snapshot
The U.S. patent system in transition: policy innovation and the innovation process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8188(02)00085-6openalex-snapshot
An asymmetric-information model of litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0144-8188(99)00011-3openalex-snapshot
Who should be worried about asymmetric information in litigation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(01)00446-3openalex-snapshot
Legal cost insurance and social welfare
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-4736(04)01504-8openalex-snapshot
FIRM STRATEGIES AND TRENDS IN PATENT LITIGATION IN THE UNITED STATES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s1574-0730(07)01005-5openalex-snapshot
Chapter 5 Empirical Study of the Civil Justice System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1743923x17000071openalex-snapshot
Avoiding Adversariness? The Effects of Gender on Litigant Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-44704-3_5openalex-snapshot
Intangibles Accounting Regulations and the “Global Intangibles Economy”: Belief-Revision, Enforcement Theory and Financial Stability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01154451.2018.1498606openalex-snapshot
Balancing the interests of labor and capital: an empirical analysis of Philippine Supreme Court labor cases from 1987 to 2016
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09668130600601800openalex-snapshot
Watchdogs or attack dogs? The role of the Russian courts and the central election commission in the resolution of electoral disputes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09692290802260555openalex-snapshot
Enabling TRIPs: The pharma–biotech–university patent coalition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10611940.2016.1176838openalex-snapshot
The State and Business at Arbitrazh Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2026.2672378openalex-snapshot
Unclear patent boundaries and patent litigation – insights from chemistry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/380476openalex-snapshot
Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/422981openalex-snapshot
The Causes of Bargaining Failure: Evidence from Major League Baseball
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/498831openalex-snapshot
Demand for a Jury Trial and the Selection of Cases for Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/592096openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Retention Politics on Judges' Voting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/684290openalex-snapshot
Political Connectedness and Court Outcomes: Evidence from Chinese Corporate Lawsuits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/3.1.125openalex-snapshot
Appeal from jury or judge trial: defendants' advantage
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahab008openalex-snapshot
New Empirical Tests for Classic Litigation Selection Models: Evidence from a Low Settlement Environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahac009openalex-snapshot
Information Costs and the Civil Justice System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahaf017openalex-snapshot
Judicial Interest Rates: Strategic Considerations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahj001openalex-snapshot
Information, Litigation, and Common Law Evolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/aler/ahy005openalex-snapshot
Litigation and Selection with Correlated Two-Sided Incomplete Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewae017openalex-snapshot
The evolution of judicial standards: evidence from litigated merger trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewm004openalex-snapshot
Litigation with Symmetric Bargaining and Two-Sided Incomplete Information
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewt002openalex-snapshot
Information and the Disposition of Medical Malpractice Claims: A Competing Risks Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewv015openalex-snapshot
Three-Party Settlement Bargaining with an Insurer Duty to Settle: Structural Model and Evidence from Malpractice Claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/picmet.2009.5262282openalex-snapshot
The connection between patent litigation and patent portfolio: An empirical study of U.S. semiconductor industry
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9574.00234openalex-snapshot
Econom(etr)ics of crime and litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12120openalex-snapshot
The Biggest “Have” of Them All: Wal‐Mart and Its Litigation Outcomes in Slip‐and‐Fall Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2009.00447.xopenalex-snapshot
Why Challenge the Ivory Tower? New Evidence on the Basicness of Academic Patents*
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.01010.xopenalex-snapshot
Comparative Analysis of Litigation Systems: An Auction‐Theoretic Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00504.xopenalex-snapshot
Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2004.00021.xopenalex-snapshot
Where Have All the Trials Gone? Settlements, Nontrial Adjudications, and Statistical Artifacts in the Changing Disposition of Federal Civil Cases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01324.xopenalex-snapshot
Underclaiming and Overclaiming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12030openalex-snapshot
Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12044openalex-snapshot
Does the Law Matter? Win Rates and Law Reforms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/joie.12093openalex-snapshot
Early Settlement in E uropean Merger Control
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030936openalex-snapshot
Field Experimentation and the Study of Law and Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/t.96.2022.tde-03102022-111116openalex-snapshot
Ontologia das provisões tributárias e trabalhistas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/001979391106400403openalex-snapshot
Are Judges Sensitive to Economic Conditions? Evidence from Uk Employment Tribunals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2152openalex-snapshot
Conflict Resolution, Public Goods, and Patent Thickets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/ajle-2025-0101openalex-snapshot
Narrower Gate to Approach the 50 %: Cost-Benefit-Screened Litigation and Plaintiff Win Rate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0050openalex-snapshot
The More Med-Mals, the Shorter the Litigation: Evidence from Florida
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2016-0054openalex-snapshot
The Selection of Litigation against Government Agencies: Evidence from China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1628/0932456042776104openalex-snapshot
»Third Party Contingency« Contracts in Settlement and Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.04.17openalex-snapshot
On Dokuzuncu Yüzyıl Osmanlısında Hukuki Düzenlemeler: Ticaret ve Nizamiye Mahkemesi Kararlarının Yanlılığı Üzerine Lojistik Regresyon Analizi
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-6919376/v1openalex-snapshot
Narrower Door to Approach the 50%: Cost-benefit-screened Litigation and Plaintiff Win Rate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1099948openalex-snapshot
The Patent Quality Control Process: Can We Afford an (Rationally) Ignorant Patent Offices?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1129719openalex-snapshot
Cognitive Dissonance, Risk Aversion and the Pretrial Negotiation Impasse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1141882openalex-snapshot
Trial and Settlement Negotiations between Asymmetrically Skilled Parties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1225866openalex-snapshot
The Selection Hypothesis, Judicial Path-Dependence and the Battle for Precedents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1324490openalex-snapshot
Legal Interpretative Process and Litigants' Cognitive Biases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1434076openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Courts of Appeals on Substantive and Procedural Success in the Federal District Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1609813openalex-snapshot
Trial Selection Theory: A Unified Model
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1864728openalex-snapshot
A Formalization and Extension of the Priest-Klein Hypothesis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1883831openalex-snapshot
The Problem of Measuring Legal Change, with Application to Bell Atlantic v. Twombly
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1884664openalex-snapshot
The Concept of Legal Uncertainty: Definition and Measurement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1925118openalex-snapshot
Playing against an Apparent Opponent: Incentives for Care, Litigation, and Damage Caps under Self-Serving Bias
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1990813openalex-snapshot
The Concept of Legal Uncertainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2065494openalex-snapshot
Does the Attitudinal Model of Supreme Court Decision Making Depend on Litigation Choices? Applying the Priest-Klein Selection Hypothesis to Litigation in the High Court
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2145590openalex-snapshot
Conflict Resolution, Public Goods and Patent Thickets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2192055openalex-snapshot
Patent Litigation Settlement in Germany - Why Parties Settle During Trial
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2432861openalex-snapshot
Liability Law and Uncertainty Spreading
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2451155openalex-snapshot
Judicial Ideology and the Selection of Disputes for U.S. Supreme Court Adjudication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2462576openalex-snapshot
Inside Post-Socialist Courts: The Determinants of Adjudicatory Outcomes in Slovenian Commercial Disputes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2590253openalex-snapshot
What You Bring to the Courthouse: The Interaction between Racial Context and Jury Awards
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3058546openalex-snapshot
Explaining a Surge in IPR Filings: Uncertain Design Rights and Learning Their Boundaries in the Finnish Sauna Heater Market
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3127728openalex-snapshot
Does the Priest and Klein Model Travel? Testing Litigation Selection Hypotheses with Foreign Court Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205741openalex-snapshot
Symmetric and Asymmetric Information Models Living Together: Evidence from Brazilian Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.346460openalex-snapshot
'Third Party Contingency' Contracts in Settlement and Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3563843openalex-snapshot
Asymmetric Stakes in Antitrust Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3896139openalex-snapshot
Consumer Protection Settlements: Theory and Policy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.427400openalex-snapshot
'Third Party Contingency' Contracts in Settlement and Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.604467openalex-snapshot
Determinants of Patent Litigation in Germany
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6462138openalex-snapshot
Judicial Incentives and the Settlement-Litigation Choice in a Hierarchical Legal System: Evidence from China
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7024740openalex-snapshot
Confidence, Optimism, and Litigation: A Litigation Model under Ambiguity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.745568openalex-snapshot
On the Effectiveness of Novelty and Inventive Step as Patentability Requirements - Structural Empirical Evidence Using Patent Indicators
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.937335openalex-snapshot
Judges, Litigants and the Design of Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2202/1555-5879.1089openalex-snapshot
On the Desirability of Appellate Courts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/2691541openalex-snapshot
Asymmetric Information and the Settlement of Insurance Claims
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24352/ub.ovgu-2018-362openalex-snapshot
Effizienzaspekte alternativer Streitbeilegung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2025gs0766openalex-snapshot
Impact evaluation of technical notes issued by NATJUS on healthcare judicialization
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-6-40-62openalex-snapshot
State and Businessin the Arbitrazh (Commercial) Litigation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33344/vol1iss1pp27-49openalex-snapshot
Prosessioikeudellisen editiovelvollisuuden oikeustaloustieteellinen analyysi
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w10825openalex-snapshot
Empirical Study of the Civil Justice System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3386/w7280openalex-snapshot
The U.S. Patent System in Transition: Policy Innovation and the Innovation Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3982/ecta12974openalex-snapshot
Bargaining With Asymmetric Information: An Empirical Study of Plea Negotiations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781782540472.00022openalex-snapshot
Trial selection theory and evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4337/9781849805681.00018openalex-snapshot
Law and economics and tort litigation institutions: theory and experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5282/ubm/epub.13206openalex-snapshot
Determinants of Noneconomic Damages in Medical Malpractice Settlements and Litigations: Evidence from Texas since 1988
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.60263099openalex-snapshot
Letting Rivals Come Close or Warding Them Off? The Effects of Substitution Threat on Imitation Deterrence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5771/9783845240862openalex-snapshot
Enforcing Intellectual Property Rights
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.58088/r3pk-sq97openalex-snapshot
The economics of patent litigation: an empirical analysis in the U.S. from 1996 to 2010
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7936/k7vt1q61openalex-snapshot
Placing Federal District Courts in the Judicial Hierarchy
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.