On the public citation graph
The Impact of Courts of Appeals on Substantive and Procedural Success in the Federal District Courts
0 signed · 41 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511613708openalex-extracted
Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2004.10767714openalex-extracted
Federal District Court Judges and the Decision to Publish
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0098261x.2006.10767785openalex-extracted
PATTERNS AND CONSEQUENCES OF JUDICIAL REVERSALS: THEORETICAL CONSIDERATIONS AND DATA FROM A DISTRICT COURT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467732openalex-extracted
The Selection of Disputes for Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3701004openalex-extracted
Appellate Court Supervision in the Federal Judiciary: A Hierarchical Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00060.xopenalex-extracted
Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00475.xopenalex-extracted
Setting a Judicial Agenda: The Decision to Grant En Banc Review in the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00325.xopenalex-extracted
Change over Tenure: Voting, Variance, and Decision Making on the U.S. Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00437.xopenalex-extracted
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104840openalex-extracted
THE POLITICAL EVOLUTION OF PRINCIPAL-AGENT MODELS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/009539977901100102openalex-extracted
Judicial Decisions and Organizational Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400307openalex-extracted
Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298003300205openalex-extracted
Responses of Federal District Judges to Court of Appeals Policies: An Exploration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591298003300405openalex-extracted
The Supreme Court's Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200101openalex-extracted
Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case of Environmental Civil Ligaton
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673x7600400104openalex-extracted
Implementation of Judicial Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1121057openalex-extracted
How Should We Study District Judge Decision-Making?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1072973openalex-extracted
Civic Virtue and the Feminine Voice in Constitutional Adjudication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1229094openalex-extracted
Why Must Inferior Courts Obey Superior Court Precedents?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110792openalex-extracted
Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2111745openalex-extracted
The Supreme Court and Federal Administrative Agencies: A Resource-Based Theory and Analysis of Judicial Impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2127600openalex-extracted
Federal District Judges and Race Relations Cases in the South
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2127776openalex-extracted
Review, Dissent and the Appellate Process: A Political Interpretation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2129183openalex-extracted
Judicial Policy-Making and Southern School Segregation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2131049openalex-extracted
Nonpublication in the United States District Courts: Official Criteria Versus Inferences from Appellate Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2131281openalex-extracted
The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2585668openalex-extracted
On the Legitimacy of National High Courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053616openalex-extracted
In the Eye of the Beholder: Tort Litigants' Evaluations of their Experiences in the Civil Justice System
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053664openalex-extracted
Studying the Iceberg from its Tip: A Comparison of Published and Unpublished Employment Discrimination Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3053830openalex-extracted
Understandings of Justice: Institutional Legitimacy, Procedural Justice, and Political Tolerance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/446947openalex-extracted
The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/797418openalex-extracted
Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zrs3openalex-extracted
The Politics of Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483329901.n8openalex-extracted
The Fired Football Coach (Or, How Trial Courts Make Policy)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35-4785openalex-extracted
The gatekeepers: federal district courts in the political process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-6706openalex-extracted
The Supreme Court and the attitudinal model revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.44-5306openalex-extracted
Are judges political?: an empirical analysis of the federal judiciary
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467397openalex-snapshot
Reconciling Asymmetric Information and Divergent Expectations Theories of Litigation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.