On the public citation graph
Are Rankings of Financial Analysts Useful to Investors?
0 signed · 12 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1535-3openalex-extracted
Expected EPS and EPS Growth as Determinantsof Value
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.007openalex-extracted
The persistence of relative performance in stock recommendations of sell-side financial analysts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2003.11.001openalex-extracted
Do Security Analysts Exhibit Persistent Differences in Stock Picking Ability?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02223.xopenalex-extracted
The Use of Earnings Forecasts in Stock Recommendations: Are Accurate Analysts More Consistent?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.xopenalex-extracted
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01800.xopenalex-extracted
Analyst Forecast Consistency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.1995.tb00461.xopenalex-extracted
Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2491255openalex-extracted
Erratum: Forecast Accuracy of Individual Analysts in Nine Industries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v2n1p1openalex-extracted
Analysts’ Target Prices and Stock Recommendations
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2680301openalex-extracted
Understanding Rankings of Financial Analysts
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.