On the public citation graph

Understanding Rankings of Financial Analysts

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2680301
0 signed · 22 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16184-1_2openalex-extracted
A Similarity-Based Adaptation of Naive Bayes for Label Ranking: Application to the Metalearning Problem of Algorithm Recommendation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10258-008-0031-7openalex-extracted
What drives idiosyncratic volatility over time?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00076-qopenalex-extracted
How certain firm-specific characteristics affect the accuracy and dispersion of analysts' forecasts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.12.006openalex-extracted
The financial analyst forecasting literature: A taxonomy with suggestions for further research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.04.007openalex-extracted
The persistence of relative performance in stock recommendations of sell-side financial analysts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.03.009openalex-extracted
Do accurate earnings forecasts facilitate superior investment recommendations?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0165-1765(02)00169-6openalex-extracted
Industry-wide versus firm-specific uncertainty and investment: British company panel data evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009668711298openalex-extracted
Analyst Forecasting Ability and the Stock Price Reaction to Forecast Revisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1012098407706openalex-extracted
Information Asymmetry and Earnings Management: Some Evidence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.4.653openalex-extracted
Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst Recommendations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq094openalex-extracted
When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00336openalex-extracted
Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock Returns
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb05205.xopenalex-extracted
Do Brokerage Analysts' Recommendations Have Investment Value?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00657.xopenalex-extracted
Analyzing the Analysts: When Do Recommendations Add Value?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01800.xopenalex-extracted
Analyst Forecast Consistency
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.2005.tb00378.xopenalex-extracted
Do Analysts' Earnings Forecasts Fully Reflect the Information in Accruals?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2680094openalex-extracted
Are Rankings of Financial Analysts Useful to Investors?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.83868openalex-extracted
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2330401openalex-extracted
Accounting Betas, Systematic Operating Risk, and Financial Leverage: A Risk-Composition Approach to the Determinants of Systematic Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2491184openalex-extracted
An Explanation for Accounting Income Smoothing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2491270openalex-extracted
Fundamental Information Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar.2005.4.1.23openalex-extracted
The Association between Macroeconomic Uncertainty and Analysts' Forecast Accuracy
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.