On the public citation graph
Blockchains and Dynamic Consent in Biobanking
0 signed · 16 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52722-8_20openalex-extracted
Blockchain and the GDPR: New Challenges for Privacy and Security
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102807openalex-extracted
Privacy enhancing technologies for solving the privacy-personalization paradox: Taxonomy and survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-019-0560-9openalex-extracted
Dwarna: a blockchain solution for dynamic consent in biobanking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1071/hc13341openalex-extracted
Ethics: Dynamic consent in the digital age of biology: online initiatives and regulatory considerations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0143openalex-extracted
The Dark Side of the Moon: The Internet of Things, Industry 4.0, and The Quantified Planet
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2019.0178openalex-extracted
Digital Transformation and Governance Innovation for Public Biobanks and Free/Libre Open Source Software Using a Blockchain Technology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocy149openalex-extracted
Blockchain-based platforms for genomic data sharing: a de-centralized approach in response to the governance problems?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1161/hypertensionaha.120.16340openalex-extracted
Data Sharing Under the General Data Protection Regulation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518806451openalex-extracted
From engaging publics to engaging knowledges: Enacting “appropriateness” in the Austrian biobank infrastructure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0159openalex-extracted
Encouraging Participation And Transparency In Biobank Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2196/27816openalex-extracted
A Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent Architecture to Support Clinical Genomic Data Sharing (ConsentChain): Proof-of-Concept Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.30953/bhty.v1.10openalex-extracted
Enforcing Human Subject Regulations using Blockchain and Smart Contracts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.51555openalex-extracted
Dynamic consent and personalised medicine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.69554/uctx7125openalex-extracted
Consent for data processing under the General Data Protection Regulation: Could ‘dynamic consent’ be a useful tool for researchers?
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2976-2_12openalex-snapshot
The Art of Ethics in Blockchain for Life Sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8966-3.ch004openalex-snapshot
Digital Identity Powered Health Ecosystems
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.