On the public citation graph

How to Prepare a Systematic Review Step by Step

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4605946
0 signed · 31 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfie.2019.09.001openalex-extracted
How to analyze and write the results of a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2014.05.014openalex-extracted
Methods for knowledge synthesis: An overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.08.008openalex-extracted
Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010openalex-extracted
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction—the why, what, when, and how
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003openalex-extracted
Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.12.007openalex-extracted
Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100425openalex-extracted
Social capital and health: A systematic review of systematic reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2012.702735openalex-extracted
Systematic review methodology in higher education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/xeb.0000000000000282openalex-extracted
Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jebm.12265openalex-extracted
Grey literature: An important resource in systematic reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24430openalex-extracted
Teaching competency in virtual education: Systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567openalex-extracted
How to Write a Systematic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586717747384openalex-extracted
How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-xopenalex-extracted
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1063openalex-extracted
The Mastery of Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge among Indonesian Biology Teachers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/s0103-21002007000200001openalex-extracted
Revisão sistemática X revisão narrativa
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37562018000000088openalex-extracted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria in research studies: definitions and why they matter
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17759/pse.2021260606openalex-extracted
Overview of Teachers’ Mental Challenges, Competences, and Readiness to the Transition to Distance Learning in the UAE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2021.381.6501openalex-extracted
Revisiones de alcance, revisiones paraguas y síntesis enfocada en revisión de mapas: aspectos metodológicos y aplicaciones
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe.2217openalex-extracted
Virtual education during COVID-19 in higher education: A systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22379/24224022373openalex-extracted
Nuevas recomendaciones de la versión PRISMA 2020 para revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.28926/ilkomnika.v3i1.38openalex-extracted
Survei Teknik-Teknik Pengukuran Kualitas Perangkat Lunak
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319854352openalex-extracted
Methodological Guidance Paper: The Art and Science of Quality Systematic Reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081245openalex-extracted
Research Progress and Trends in the Field of Satellite Ozone from 2005 to 2023: A Bibliometric Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030177openalex-extracted
Analytical Competences of Teachers in Big Data in the Era of Digitalized Learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169231openalex-extracted
Teacher Competences for Active Learning in Engineering Education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.34193/ei-a-5523openalex-extracted
A young researcher's guide to a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i19.14923openalex-extracted
Digital Teaching Competence and Space Competence with TPACK in Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5554/22562087.e913openalex-extracted
Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews using the AMSTAR tool
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2022.09.2622openalex-extracted
Systematic reviews: Key concepts for health professionals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.15.3.239221openalex-extracted
El diseño de preguntas clínicas en la práctica basada en la evidencia. Modelos de formulación
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.