On the public citation graph
Diachronic Variations of Metadiscourse Markers in Research Articles
0 signed · 20 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20961openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse markers in biological research articles and journal impact factor: Non‐native writers vs. native writers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-6059-1_24openalex-extracted
Linguistic Transformations for Information Retrieval
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001openalex-extracted
“In this paper we suggest”: Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.07.003openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.02.002openalex-extracted
‘Robot Kung fu’: Gender and professional identity in biology and philosophy reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2011.04.007openalex-extracted
Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles: A comparative study of English- and Chinese-medium journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00009-5openalex-extracted
Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444808005235openalex-extracted
Genre and academic writing in the disciplines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-6405.12166openalex-extracted
SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445612471476openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse in English and Chinese research article introductions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2017.12616openalex-extracted
Poring Over Metadiscourse Use in Discussion and Conclusion Sections of Academic Articles Written by Iranian ESP Students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22055/rals.2018.13793openalex-extracted
Metadiscourse in Applied Linguistics and Chemistry Research Article Introductions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809068.ch29openalex-extracted
English for academic purposes and discourse analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244-42openalex-extracted
English for academic purposes and discourse analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.47012/jjmll.13.2.5openalex-extracted
Comparative Study of Interactional Metadiscourse Markers in the Discussion Section of Soft and Hard Science Research Articles: Hedges and Boosters in Focus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500089.001.0001openalex-extracted
Writing Your Journal Article in Twelve Weeks, Second Edition
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.