On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4656336

0 signed · 26 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8openalex-extracted
Analyzing Qualitative Data with MAXQDA: Text, Audio, and Video
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0362-3319(91)90003-mopenalex-extracted
The group interview in social research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003openalex-extracted
A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2014.03.002openalex-extracted
Assembling validity evidence for assessing academic writing: Rater reactions to integrated tasks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.004openalex-extracted
Developing rubrics to assess the reading-into-writing skills: A case study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2017.03.003openalex-extracted
Evaluating rater accuracy and perception for integrated writing assessments using a mixed-methods approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006openalex-extracted
The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230514577openalex-extracted
Language Testing and Validation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15434300903464418openalex-extracted
Variability in ESL Essay Rating Processes: The Role of the Rating Scale and Rater Experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.622016openalex-extracted
Assessing Integrated Writing Tasks for Academic Purposes: Promises and Perils
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.649381openalex-extracted
Operational Rater Types in Writing Assessment: Linking Rater Cognition to Rater Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2012.750659openalex-extracted
The Use of Summarization Tasks: Some Lexical and Conceptual Analyses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2011.643130openalex-extracted
Research methods in education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2012.00243.xopenalex-extracted
Rater Cognition Research: Some Possible Directions for the Future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00096.xopenalex-extracted
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12201openalex-extracted
The Effects of Incomplete Rating Designs in Combination With Rater Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210376379openalex-extracted
Think-aloud protocols in research on essay rating: An empirical study of their veridicality and reactivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532211406422openalex-extracted
The development and maintenance of rating quality in performance writing assessment: A longitudinal study of new and experienced raters
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215575626openalex-extracted
Determining the scoring validity of a co-constructed CEFR-based rating scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215582283openalex-extracted
A comparison of newly-trained and experienced raters on a standardized writing assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532217710049openalex-extracted
Validation of rating processes within an argument-based framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532221994052openalex-extracted
Revisiting rating scale development for rater-mediated language performance assessments: Modelling construct and contextual choices made by scale developers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231155561openalex-extracted
Operationalizing the reading-into-writing construct in analytic rating scales: Effects of different approaches on rating
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oaopenalex-extracted
Using thematic analysis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1598/rrq.24.1.1openalex-extracted
Readers as Writers Composing From Sources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.214047openalex-extracted
Do ESL Essay Raters' Evaluation Criteria Change With Experience? A Mixed‐Methods, Cross‐Sectional Study
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.