On the public citation graph

The Replication Crisis is Less of a “Crisis” in Lakatos’ Philosophy of Science than it is in Popper's

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4673378
0 signed · 43 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01801276openalex-snapshot
Ceteris paribus clauses, closure clauses and falsifiability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09817-2openalex-snapshot
The Development of Cognitive Load Theory: Replication Crises and Incorporation of Other Theories Can Lead to Theory Expansion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-023-09901-4openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Functions of Replicability in Experimental Sciences: Defending the Orthodox View
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00329-2openalex-snapshot
The role of replication in psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.002openalex-snapshot
On the scientific superiority of conceptual replications for scientific progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781107286184openalex-snapshot
Statistical Inference as Severe Testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621123openalex-snapshot
The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139171434.009openalex-snapshot
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x18000602openalex-snapshot
The meaning of a claim is its reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.38.2.204openalex-snapshot
Theory-driven science and naive empiricism in counseling psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001416openalex-snapshot
An exploration of physics envy with implications for desiderata of psychology theories.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000294openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000302openalex-snapshot
Reconsidering statistical methods for assessing replication.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000179openalex-snapshot
Are psychologists appraising research properly? Some Popperian notes regarding replication failures in psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-zopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705451openalex-snapshot
Why Replication Is Overrated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/69.1.149openalex-snapshot
II—Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/26.1.1openalex-snapshot
Imre Lakatos
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy051openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1097/00001648-199001000-00011openalex-snapshot
White Swans, Black Ravens, and Lame Ducks: Necessary and Sufficient Causes in Epidemiology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.142.3590.339.aopenalex-snapshot
Chaos in the Brickyard
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157openalex-snapshot
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245openalex-snapshot
Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/posc_a_00627openalex-snapshot
Conflicting Results and Statistical Malleability: Embracing Pluralism of Empirical Results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319835322openalex-snapshot
Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319838343openalex-snapshot
Putting Popper to work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09593543231160112openalex-snapshot
The epistemic and pragmatic function of dichotomous claims based on statistical hypothesis tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970585openalex-snapshot
How Computational Modeling Can Force Theory Building in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041116openalex-snapshot
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-022-02838-0openalex-snapshot
The swan genome and transcriptome, it is not all black and white
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0102_1openalex-snapshot
Appraising and Amending Theories: The Strategy of Lakatosian Defense and Two Principles that Warrant It
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000691openalex-snapshot
What is replication?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1561/104.00000053openalex-snapshot
Is Economics Research Replicable? Sixty Published Papers From Thirteen Journals Say “Often Not”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/27784393openalex-snapshot
Inference to the best explanation: A neglected approach to theory appraisal in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.12746openalex-snapshot
About some misconceptions and the discontent with statistical tests in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/3t7pcopenalex-snapshot
The Preregistration Prescriptiveness Trade-Off and Unknown Unknowns in Science: Comments on Van Drimmelen (2023)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/pdm7yopenalex-snapshot
A Falsificationist Treatment of Auxiliary Hypotheses in Social and Behavioral Sciences: Systematic Replications Framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3356/jrr-21-56openalex-snapshot
Why Are Snowy Owls White and Why Have They Evolved Distinct Sexual Color Dimorphism? A Review of Questions and Hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621openalex-snapshot
Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36850/4d35-44bdopenalex-snapshot
Type I Error Rates are Not Usually Inflated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4openalex-snapshot
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1030-9openalex-snapshot
Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.