On the public citation graph

Questionable Metascience Practices

https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4
0 signed · 151 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn519openalex-snapshot
Open Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208openalex-snapshot
Pre‐registration: Why and How
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1209openalex-snapshot
Preregistration Is Neither Sufficient nor Necessary for Good Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1224openalex-snapshot
Is the drive for reproducible science having a detrimental effect on what is published?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21730openalex-snapshot
Open for whom? The need to define open science for science education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_614openalex-snapshot
Methodologism/Methodological Imperative
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_695-1openalex-snapshot
Perspectival Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09490-3openalex-snapshot
Metascience as a Scientific Social Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01387-wopenalex-snapshot
The epistemic impact of theorizing: generation bias implies evaluation bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02433-0openalex-snapshot
What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4openalex-snapshot
When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0065-xopenalex-snapshot
Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0269-1openalex-snapshot
The limits of replicability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00324-7openalex-snapshot
Experimenter as automaton; experimenter as human: exploring the position of the researcher in scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010openalex-snapshot
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009openalex-snapshot
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.009openalex-snapshot
Is Preregistration Worthwhile?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511524059openalex-snapshot
Constructing the Subject
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.89openalex-snapshot
In Defense of HARKing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2022.4openalex-snapshot
Breaking free
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.45openalex-snapshot
Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17001972openalex-snapshot
Making replication mainstream
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192openalex-snapshot
Registered Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.38.2.204openalex-snapshot
Theory-driven science and naive empiricism in counseling psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400openalex-snapshot
Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000154openalex-snapshot
Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000169openalex-snapshot
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000246openalex-snapshot
A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000326openalex-snapshot
I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128openalex-snapshot
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000135openalex-snapshot
An Evaluation of Four Solutions to the Forking Paths Problem: Adjusted Alpha, Preregistration, Sensitivity Analyses, and Abandoning the Neyman-Pearson Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061802openalex-snapshot
The problem of quantification in psychological science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074554openalex-snapshot
Mathematical vs. scientific significance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000129openalex-snapshot
The replication crisis: How might philosophy and theory of psychology be of use?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000137openalex-snapshot
The replication crisis in psychology: An overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000171openalex-snapshot
Replication and reform: Vagaries of a social movement.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01307-2openalex-snapshot
Rein in the four horsemen of irreproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14203-0openalex-snapshot
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021openalex-snapshot
A manifesto for reproducible science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7openalex-snapshot
The past, present and future of Registered Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01203-8openalex-snapshot
Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2openalex-snapshot
Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114openalex-snapshot
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114openalex-snapshot
The preregistration revolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1901709openalex-snapshot
Open science reforms: Strengths, challenges, and future directions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02690055.2019.1577602openalex-snapshot
Broken/Home
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2021.1943292openalex-snapshot
Replicability Crisis and Scientific Reforms: Overlooked Issues and Unmet Challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771openalex-snapshot
Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705451openalex-snapshot
Why Replication Is Overrated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy051openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz050openalex-snapshot
The Costs of HARKing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab032openalex-snapshot
The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197518977.001.0001openalex-snapshot
How Social Science Got Better
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197555620.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Perspectival Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Scientific Objectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805openalex-snapshot
The case for formal methodology in scientific reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221042openalex-snapshot
The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542018000036b009openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12541openalex-snapshot
Ad hominem rhetoric in scientific psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576openalex-snapshot
When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00222.xopenalex-snapshot
Presenting Post Hoc Hypotheses as A Priori: Ethical and Theoretical Issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12525openalex-snapshot
Scientific progress: Four accounts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12735openalex-snapshot
Reflexivity in quantitative research: A rationale and beginner's guide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157openalex-snapshot
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836openalex-snapshot
Psychology's Renaissance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845openalex-snapshot
Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090221-035954openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245openalex-snapshot
Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071openalex-snapshot
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221126388openalex-snapshot
Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211036460openalex-snapshot
Open Science From a Qualitative, Feminist Perspective: Epistemological Dogmas and a Call for Critical Examination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184211021383openalex-snapshot
Arguments against efficiency in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632openalex-snapshot
False-Positive Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319835322openalex-snapshot
Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319838343openalex-snapshot
Putting Popper to work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211022181openalex-snapshot
No harm in being self-corrective: Self-criticism and reform intentions increase researchers’ epistemic trustworthiness and credibility in the eyes of the public
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211067779openalex-snapshot
Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/097168589600200107openalex-snapshot
Science, Ignorance and Human Values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320931366openalex-snapshot
A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211015636openalex-snapshot
The Tone Debate: Knowledge, Self, and Social Order
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046514openalex-snapshot
Understanding Replication in a Way That Is True to Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046518openalex-snapshot
How to True Psychology’s Objects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211066466openalex-snapshot
The Function of Literature in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221083876openalex-snapshot
Metascience Is Not Enough – A Plea for Psychological Humanities in the Wake of the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500306openalex-snapshot
Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058openalex-snapshot
Scientific Utopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078openalex-snapshot
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514450openalex-snapshot
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518openalex-snapshot
Expectations for Replications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689062openalex-snapshot
Is Psychology Moving in the Right Direction? An Analysis of the Evidentiary Value Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707314openalex-snapshot
Cultural Change Over Time: Why Replicability Should Not Be the Gold Standard in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617745651openalex-snapshot
The Creative Cycle and the Growth of Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884openalex-snapshot
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796openalex-snapshot
Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970604openalex-snapshot
Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620977471openalex-snapshot
Practical Methodological Reform Needs Good Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017098openalex-snapshot
Beyond Statistical Ritual: Theory in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041116openalex-snapshot
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221114835openalex-snapshot
Is Open Science Neoliberal?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519openalex-snapshot
The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925openalex-snapshot
A Traveler’s Guide to the Multiverse: Promises, Pitfalls, and a Framework for the Evaluation of Analytic Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467openalex-snapshot
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.128733.1openalex-snapshot
Researchers on research integrity: a survey of European and American researchers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125openalex-snapshot
Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12691openalex-snapshot
Replicability of Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-socsci.arysbi.v1openalex-snapshot
Research practices and assessment of research misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753openalex-snapshot
Science as Social Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400884940openalex-snapshot
The Seven Deadly Sins of Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.121383openalex-snapshot
Open Research Reforms and the Capitalist University: Areas of Opposition and Alignment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376openalex-snapshot
Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.797openalex-snapshot
Registered Reports as a vaccine against research bias: Past, present and future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fgv79openalex-snapshot
Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: A bank of lesson plans and resources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/rkyf7openalex-snapshot
Revisiting the replication crisis without false positives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02183openalex-snapshot
Replication and the Establishment of Scientific Truth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01645-2openalex-snapshot
Addressing the theory crisis in psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.53962/meeb-2ktdopenalex-snapshot
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226292144.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Scientific Perspectivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.58237openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.67995openalex-snapshot
Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.71601openalex-snapshot
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-025-01301-7openalex-snapshot
Kriterien zur Sicherstellung der Reproduzierbarkeit quantitativ-empirischer Studien: Empfehlungen und Positivbeispiele
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-024-00629-xopenalex-snapshot
The replication crisis is less of a “crisis” in Lakatos’ philosophy of science than it is in Popper’s
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00727-yopenalex-snapshot
Reproducibility, questionable research practices and ethico-epistemic trade-offs in animal-based biomedicine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2024.102327openalex-snapshot
Incentives and the replication crisis in social sciences: A critical review of open science practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9openalex-snapshot
Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-026-02602-5openalex-snapshot
There is no clear target for replication rates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230677openalex-snapshot
Fifty years of research on questionable research practises in science: quantitative analysis of co-citation patterns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20966083251329632openalex-snapshot
Care for the soul of science: Equity and virtue in reform and reformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251348431openalex-snapshot
Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4673378openalex-snapshot
The Replication Crisis is Less of a “Crisis” in Lakatos’ Philosophy of Science than it is in Popper's
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6z9c3_v1openalex-snapshot
Open With Care! Consent, Context, and Co-production in Open Qualitative Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/6xzaw_v1openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ah9wb_v1openalex-snapshot
A brief review of research that questions the impact of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ah9wb_v3openalex-snapshot
A brief review of research that questions the impact of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860740openalex-snapshot
What is critical metascience and why is it important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36850/ed4openalex-snapshot
Reflections on the Unintended Consequences of the Science Reform Movement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/226mm-rxj10openalex-snapshot
Theory Aversion, Methodolatry, and Scientism in Psychology and Metascience: Comment on Cornejo and Rojas (2026)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/2w1s0-6rq05openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/86y7r-7ca63openalex-snapshot
Theory Aversion, Methodolatry, and Scientism in Psychology and Metascience: Comment on Cornejo and Rojas (2026)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/8rscj-bgy43openalex-snapshot
What's Special About Metascience?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/93m4p-sde68openalex-snapshot
Let's Talk about Science Reform! Introducing a Workshop on Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigating the Open Science Movement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/awhsb-3jy60openalex-snapshot
Is a 55% Replication Rate Too Low, Too High, or Just Right?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/bhtkz-ypb51openalex-snapshot
What is Critical Metascience and Why is it Important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/fbcmj-2f267openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/qfena-7xp96openalex-snapshot
Is a 55% Replication Rate Too Low, Too High, or Just Right?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/zcfyc-00d92openalex-snapshot
Let's Talk about Science Reform! Introducing a Workshop on Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigating the Open Science Movement
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.