On the public citation graph

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4673892

0 signed · 25 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56475-3_28openalex-extracted
LCA of Buildings and the Built Environment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1253-zopenalex-extracted
Towards guidance values for the environmental performance of buildings: application to the statistical analysis of 40 low-energy single family houses’ LCA in France
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01985-zopenalex-extracted
Influence of methodological choices on maintenance and replacement in building LCA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.09.008openalex-extracted
Benchmarks for environmental impact of housing in Europe: Definition of archetypes and LCA of the residential building stock
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106904openalex-extracted
Uncertainty of building elements’ service lives in building LCA & LCC: What matters?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2006.07.001openalex-extracted
Energy use in the life cycle of conventional and low-energy buildings: A review article
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.030openalex-extracted
IEA EBC annex 57 ‘evaluation of embodied energy and CO 2eq for building construction’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.11.013openalex-extracted
Analysing methodological choices in calculations of embodied energy and GHG emissions from buildings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.053openalex-extracted
Requirements set by Swedish municipalities to promote construction with low climate change impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.233openalex-extracted
Widening understanding of low embodied impact buildings: Results and recommendations from 80 multi-national quantitative and qualitative case studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135422openalex-extracted
Using systematic building decomposition for implementing LCA: The results of a comparative analysis as part of IEA EBC Annex 72
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102646openalex-extracted
Service life of building envelopes: A critical literature review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.001openalex-extracted
Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.058openalex-extracted
Recent developments, future challenges and new research directions in LCA of buildings: A critical review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.049openalex-extracted
Scrutinising embodied carbon in buildings: The next performance gap made manifest
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa54eeopenalex-extracted
Can life-cycle assessment produce reliable policy guidelines in the building sector?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012054openalex-extracted
Existing benchmark systems for assessing global warming potential of buildings – Analysis of IEA EBC Annex 72 cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012056openalex-extracted
Level(s) compared to European and Norwegian standards for life cycle assessment of buildings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032027openalex-extracted
Investigation of maintenance and replacement of materials in building LCA
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032047openalex-extracted
Reducing embodied impacts of buildings – insights from a social power analysis of the UK and Sweden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032048openalex-extracted
Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – Critical reflection of benchmark comparison and in-depth analysis of drivers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1553/easac_report_decarbonisation-of-building_2021openalex-extracted
Decarbonisation of buildings: for climate, health and jobs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6397514openalex-extracted
Towards embodied carbon benchmarks for buildings in Europe - Summary report
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7468021openalex-extracted
Assessing Life Cycle Related Environmental Impacts Caused by Buildings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.325openalex-extracted
GHG emissions from building renovation versus new-build: incentives from assessment methods
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.