On the public citation graph
GHG emissions from building renovation versus new-build: incentives from assessment methods
0 signed · 38 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01893-2openalex-snapshot
The evolution of life cycle assessment in European policies over three decades
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114107openalex-snapshot
Embodied GHG emissions of buildings – The hidden challenge for effective climate change mitigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119102openalex-snapshot
Bio-based materials as a robust solution for building renovation: A case study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.04.018openalex-snapshot
Embodied greenhouse gas emissions from refurbishment of residential building stock to achieve a 50% operational energy reduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.03.012openalex-snapshot
Environmental assessment of deep energy refurbishment for energy efficiency-case study of an office building in New Zealand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.047openalex-snapshot
Energy and environmental payback times for an NZEB retrofit
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106218openalex-snapshot
Comparative whole-building life cycle assessment of renovation and new construction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.106644openalex-snapshot
Embodied Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) comparison of residential building retrofit measures in Atlanta
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.04.008openalex-snapshot
The impact of future scenarios on building refurbishment strategies towards plus energy buildings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.08.030openalex-snapshot
IEA EBC annex 57 ‘evaluation of embodied energy and CO 2eq for building construction’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.023openalex-snapshot
Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.037openalex-snapshot
Analysis of the payback of primary energy and CO2 emissions in relation to the increase of thermal resistance of a building
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129527openalex-snapshot
An LCA methodolody for assessing the environmental impacts of building components before and after refurbishment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.02.055openalex-snapshot
Cradle-to-grave life-cycle assessment within the built environment: Comparison between the refurbishment and the complete reconstruction of an office building in Belgium
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.07.061openalex-snapshot
The life cycle carbon footprint of refurbished and new buildings – A systematic review of case studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112636openalex-snapshot
Holistic assessment of carbon abatement strategies in building refurbishment literature — A scoping review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013openalex-snapshot
Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1078/1/012095openalex-snapshot
Reviewing allocation approaches and modelling in LCA for building refurbishment
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bapi.202400037openalex-snapshot
Ökobilanzielle Bewertung von Wohnbauten – Teil 2: Detailbetrachtungen und Ausblick
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111658openalex-snapshot
Limit values in LCA-based regulations for buildings – System boundaries and implications on practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2026.114862openalex-snapshot
The climate impact of office-to-residential adaptive reuse: A Swedish case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2025.100317openalex-snapshot
Evaluating, benchmarking, and reducing embodied carbon of deep retrofit homes with significant extension: Irish case studies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2026.118075openalex-snapshot
Material use and embodied GHG in refurbishment and adaptive reuse of existing buildings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.112506openalex-snapshot
Anatomy of methods for measuring life cycle carbon emission of built environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113825openalex-snapshot
Environmental impact assessment of refurbishment versus new Construction: A multi-category life cycle analysis of building projects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202565401009openalex-snapshot
The environmental and energetic impact of prefabricated envelope components with bio-based materials for deep renovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1546/1/012044openalex-snapshot
Renovation versus demolition and reconstruction: the state of the art of LCA studies in a resource efficiency perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1554/1/012134openalex-snapshot
Towards Zero Emissions Buildings – A multi-criteria assessment of a timber-framed prefabricated façade solution incorporating bio-based materials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/adfc95openalex-snapshot
Leveraging building permit data for large-scale embodied carbon assessment of residential building construction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241953openalex-snapshot
Parametric contribution of building form to whole-life carbon decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/sasbe-11-2025-0721openalex-snapshot
Bridging research and practice in circular biobased construction: a scoping review and stakeholder perspectives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5248436openalex-snapshot
Leveraging building permit data for large-scale embodied carbon and circularity assessment of residential building construction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15183388openalex-snapshot
Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Reconstruction and Renovation for Carbon Reduction in Buildings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/su151813981openalex-snapshot
Towards Assessing Embodied Emissions in Existing Buildings LCA—Comparison of Continuing Use, Energetic Refurbishment versus Demolition and New Construction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/bc.436openalex-snapshot
Promoting practices of sufficiency: reprogramming resource-intensive material arrangements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/bc.472openalex-snapshot
Towards urban LCA: examining densification alternatives for a residential neighbourhood
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54337/aau588623820openalex-snapshot
Towards Low-Carbon Design in the Building Sector: Investigating method and benchmark for life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from renovation and the integration of digital tools in the design process
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.