On the public citation graph

New-to-The-World and New-to-Self - Academic Research Funding and Impact

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766921
0 signed · 41 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::aid-smj927>3.0.co;2-yopenalex-extracted
HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<143::aid-smj927>3.3.co;2-popenalex-extracted
HETEROGENEITY OF FIRM CAPABILITIES AND COOPERATIVE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AN EMPIRICAL EXAMINATION OF MOTIVES
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160openalex-extracted
Beyond local search: boundary‐spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disk industry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2037openalex-extracted
Resources as dual sources of advantage: Implications for valuing entrepreneurial‐firm patents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.274openalex-extracted
Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3501openalex-extracted
Blinded by the person? Experimental evidence from idea evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009openalex-extracted
The myopia of learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.738openalex-extracted
Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.966openalex-extracted
Corporate capital allocation: a behavioral perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2816-9openalex-extracted
Does Greenwashing Pay Off? Understanding the Relationship Between Environmental Actions and Environmental Legitimacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101108openalex-extracted
The Matthew effect and the halo effect in research funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.05.005openalex-extracted
The impact of research grant funding on scientific productivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.03.004openalex-extracted
Extramural research grants and scientists’ funding strategies: Beggars cannot be choosers?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.009openalex-extracted
Does massive funding support of researchers work?: Evaluating the impact of the South African research chair funding initiative
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.014openalex-extracted
Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.07.021openalex-extracted
The important thing is not to win, it is to take part: What if scientists benefit from participating in research grant competitions?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.008openalex-extracted
Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103983openalex-extracted
Public funding and the ascent of Chinese science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104780openalex-extracted
Performance-based research funding: Evidence from the largest natural experiment worldwide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104868openalex-extracted
Exploring the effect of overlapping institutional applications on panel decision-making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00009-4openalex-extracted
Research groups as ‘quasi-firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-7218(10)01014-2openalex-extracted
The Financing of R&D and Innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.239openalex-extracted
Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315openalex-extracted
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1077-34openalex-extracted
Peer Review and the Support of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115openalex-extracted
The Matthew effect in science funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.93.23.12709openalex-extracted
Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/592419openalex-extracted
What If Congress Doubled R&D Spending on the Physical Sciences?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1977.tb03277.xopenalex-extracted
INFORMATIONAL ASYMMETRIES, FINANCIAL STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.xopenalex-extracted
Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56openalex-extracted
The Matthew Effect in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167293195010openalex-extracted
Trait-Behavior Relations and Dispositional Inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2013.1755openalex-extracted
Matthew: Effect or Fable?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285openalex-extracted
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2018.1216openalex-extracted
Paradise of Novelty—Or Loss of Human Capital? Exploring New Fields and Inventive Output
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17226/6200openalex-extracted
Assessing the Value of Research in the Chemical Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2062370openalex-extracted
Communication Strategies for Family Planning.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/20777571openalex-extracted
The Impact of NSF Support for Basic Research In Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w30320openalex-extracted
Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.19573108openalex-extracted
Being Good or Being Known: An Empirical Examination of the Dimensions, Antecedents, and Consequences of Organizational Reputation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0861openalex-extracted
Evaluating Novelty: The Role of Panels in the Selection of R&D Projects
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.