On the public citation graph

Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking

https://doi.org/10.3386/w30320
0 signed · 58 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6746-4openalex-snapshot
The Changing Governance of the Sciences : The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9314-4openalex-snapshot
How do National Career Systems Promote or Hinder the Emergence of New Research Lines?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.005openalex-snapshot
Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.014openalex-snapshot
Organizational and institutional influences on creativity in scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.006openalex-snapshot
Beyond breakthrough research: Epistemic properties of research and their consequences for research funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007openalex-snapshot
Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.07.004openalex-snapshot
Improving the Peer review process: Capturing more information and enabling high-risk/high-return research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006openalex-snapshot
Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.014openalex-snapshot
Funding model and creativity in science: Competitive versus block funding and status contingency effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.008openalex-snapshot
Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475openalex-snapshot
Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850openalex-snapshot
The associative basis of the creative process.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18315openalex-snapshot
Interdisciplinary research has consistently lower funding success
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111openalex-snapshot
Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1719557115openalex-snapshot
The Matthew effect in science funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/258177openalex-snapshot
The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/719252openalex-snapshot
Funding Risky Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvs001openalex-snapshot
Conservatism and risk-taking in peer review: Emerging ERC practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvt006openalex-snapshot
Evaluating transformative research programmes: A case study of the NSF Small Grants for Exploratory Research programme
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab031openalex-snapshot
Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/jepp-04-2014-0017openalex-snapshot
The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.xopenalex-snapshot
Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474openalex-snapshot
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-155openalex-snapshot
Goodbye, Columbus
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285openalex-snapshot
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212286openalex-snapshot
Effects of seniority, gender and geography on the bibliometric output and collaboration networks of European Research Council (ERC) grant recipients
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1053493openalex-snapshot
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1058233openalex-snapshot
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2579681openalex-snapshot
Peerless Science: Peer Review and U.S. Science Policy.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w28562openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty and Risk-Taking in Science: Meaning, Measurement and Management in Peer Review of Research Proposals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.51-3359openalex-snapshot
The entrepreneurial state: debunking public vs. private sector myths

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4766921openalex-extracted
New-to-The-World and New-to-Self - Academic Research Funding and Impact
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-026-10333-yopenalex-snapshot
How does philanthropy influence the diffusion of knowledge? Impacts from donations on scientific publications and patents in STEM
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09514-yopenalex-snapshot
New Arguments for a pure lottery in Research Funding: A Sketch for a Future Science Policy Without Time-Consuming Grant Competitions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00465-5openalex-snapshot
How Competition for Funding Impacts Scientific Practice: Building Pre-fab Houses but no Cathedrals
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00738-9openalex-snapshot
Pursuitworthiness of breakthrough experiments: transforming emerging intuitions into established norms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101426openalex-snapshot
Measuring risk in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101448openalex-snapshot
Does grant funding foster research impact? Evidence from France
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105038openalex-snapshot
ERC science and invention: Does ERC break free from the EU Paradox?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105076openalex-snapshot
Research-targeting, spillovers, and the direction of science: Evidence from HIV research-funding
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105345openalex-snapshot
The geography of novel and atypical research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2025.105360openalex-snapshot
Do mission-oriented grant schemes shape the direction of science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2407644121openalex-snapshot
The costs of competition in distributing scarce research funds
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2025.2608301openalex-snapshot
Can There Be Another Einstein?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2025.2486344openalex-snapshot
Do funding agencies select and enable novel research: evidence from ERC
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad064openalex-snapshot
Gerontocracy, labor market bottlenecks, and generational crises in modern science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae062openalex-snapshot
What is ‘high-risk research’? Comparing the social sciences and humanities and the natural sciences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2022.07.30.502158openalex-snapshot
How competition for funding impacts scientific practice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12600openalex-snapshot
Vice versa: The decoupling of content and topic heterogeneity in collusion research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2025-0027openalex-snapshot
Industriepolitik in Europa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1787/4889f5f2-enopenalex-snapshot
Measuring governments’ R&D funding response to COVID-19
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4890351openalex-snapshot
Is Innovating Risky? The Effects of R&D on Idiosyncratic and Systematic Firm Risk
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5034380openalex-snapshot
Is This Obvious? Screening for Important Contributions in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5148652openalex-snapshot
Is Novel Research Always Risky?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0897-5.ch005openalex-snapshot
Navigating Financial Challenges in Academic Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2210.02957openalex-snapshot
From Rules to Regs: A Structural Topic Model of Collusion Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5194/gh-80-123-2025openalex-snapshot
Studying state violence through an embodied approach: methodological reflections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53479/30089openalex-snapshot
The long-term causal effects of winning an ERC grant
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.