On the public citation graph
Are Judges Influenced by Dollar Amounts? Evidence from Tax Law
0 signed · 49 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2518openalex-extracted
Extracting Parity and Magnitude from Arabic Numerals: Developmental Changes in Number Processing and Mental Representation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107156openalex-extracted
Do United States Tax Court judge attributes influence the resolution of corporate tax disputes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.02.026openalex-extracted
Behavioral bias in number processing: Evidence from analysts’ expectations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103206openalex-extracted
Psychological pricing: Myth or reality? The impact of nine-ending prices on purchasing attitudes and brand revenue
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609800.016openalex-extracted
Using the Social Background Model to Explain Who Wins Federal Appellate Tax Decisions: Do Less Traditional Judges Favor the Taxpayer?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015258732676openalex-extracted
Difference, Disparity, and Race/Ethnic Bias in Federal Sentencing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1029/2010gl044830openalex-extracted
Benford's law in the natural sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001117openalex-extracted
Vertical attention bias for tops of objects and bottoms of scenes.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-11900-7openalex-extracted
On the round number bias and wisdom of crowds in different response formats for numerical estimation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1996.10473558openalex-extracted
On the Peculiar Distribution of the U.S. Stock Indexes' Digits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02664760601004940openalex-extracted
Not the First Digit! Using Benford's Law to Detect Fraudulent Scientif ic Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/296157openalex-extracted
Memory and Markets, or Why Are You Paying $2.99 for a Widget?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/467960openalex-extracted
Politics and the Judiciary: The Influence of Judicial Background on Case Outcomes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01720.xopenalex-extracted
Numeracy and Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2010.01183.xopenalex-extracted
Let My People Go: Ethnic In‐Group Bias in Judicial Decisions—Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12298openalex-extracted
The Dogma Within? Examining Religious Bias in Private Title VII Claims
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jfir.12247openalex-extracted
Round‐number biases on trading time: Evidence from international markets
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124openalex-extracted
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085032openalex-extracted
Judging the Judiciary by the Numbers: Empirical Research on Judges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051617-090650openalex-extracted
Bias and Judging
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21090openalex-extracted
All Numbers Are Not Equal: An Electrophysiological Investigation of Small and Large Number Representations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720932532openalex-extracted
The Left-Digit Bias: When and Why Are Consumers Penny Wise and Pound Foolish?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1198/tast.2009.0005openalex-extracted
A Simple Explanation of Benford's Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4001_3openalex-extracted
Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.11.3397openalex-extracted
A Test of Racial Bias in Capital Sentencing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2018.0775openalex-extracted
Salience Bias in Crowdsourcing Contests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2417openalex-extracted
Reference-Dependent Preferences: Evidence from Marathon Runners
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2646openalex-extracted
Overcoming Salience Bias: How Real-Time Feedback Fosters Resource Conservation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/jhr.2009.0010openalex-extracted
Detecting Problems in Survey Data Using Benford's Law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.2.327openalex-extracted
The Sources and Consequences of the Fluent Processing of Numbers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.163568openalex-extracted
Which Cases Go to Trial?: An Empirical Study of Predictors of Failure to Settle
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2016522openalex-extracted
The Dimensions of Judicial Impartiality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2105785openalex-extracted
Policy Preferences and Expertise in Canadian Tax Adjudication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.299567openalex-extracted
Empirical Research on Judicial Reasoning: Statutory Interpretation in Federal Tax Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.320887openalex-extracted
Assessing and Predicting Who Wins Federal Tax Trial Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.467242openalex-extracted
Statutory Construction in Federal Appellate Tax Cases: The Effect of Judges' Social Backgrounds and of Other Aspects of Litigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/20159081openalex-extracted
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3202429openalex-extracted
Ideological Voting on Federal Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.benford.analysisopenalex-extracted
benford.analysis: Benford Analysis for Data Validation and Forensic Analytics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32614/r.manualsopenalex-extracted
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2020.68.2.sym.hwongopenalex-extracted
GAAR in Action: An Empirical Study of Transaction Types and Judicial Attributes in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03202644openalex-extracted
An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4337/9781848447448.00015openalex-extracted
Heuristics in Numerical Cognition: Implications for Pricing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5744/ftr.2019.1004openalex-extracted
Measuring the Effect of Social Background on Judicial Decision-Making in Tax Cases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.186422openalex-extracted
The grapes of math: how life reflects numbers and numbers reflect life
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.193760openalex-extracted
Benford's law: theory and applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774855846openalex-extracted
Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3427957openalex-snapshot
Do Tax Judges Think About the Economy?
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.