On the public citation graph
Response Styles Improve Model Fit of Big Five
0 signed · 146 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0264openalex-extracted
Problems Attract Problems: A Network Perspective on Mental Disorders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2315openalex-extracted
Superheroes for change: Physical safety promotes socially (but not economically) progressive attitudes among conservatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20503openalex-extracted
Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22284openalex-extracted
Use of Social Desirability Scales in Clinical Psychology: A Systematic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1866openalex-extracted
Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can't like Parties if you Don't like People
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1960openalex-extracted
Criterion Validity is Maintained When Items Are Evaluatively Neutralized: Evidence from A Full–Scale Five–Factor Model Inventory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2242openalex-extracted
Objections to the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure—and why those Objections Fail
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.417openalex-extracted
A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.753openalex-extracted
Predicting academic success with the Big 5 rated from different points of view: Self‐rated, other rated and faked
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.839openalex-extracted
The General Factor of Personality and Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375openalex-extracted
A network theory of mental disorders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24520-1openalex-extracted
Multilevel Network Analysis for the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289658openalex-extracted
Some Contributions to Maximum Likelihood Factor Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-007-9035-xopenalex-extracted
Factors affecting responses to Likert type questionnaires: introduction of the ImpExp, a new comprehensive model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-009-9135-yopenalex-extracted
Ensuring Positiveness of the Scaled Difference Chi-square Test Statistic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-017-9557-xopenalex-extracted
Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50006-xopenalex-extracted
Measurement and Control of Response Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006openalex-extracted
Can network analysis transform psychopathology?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2021.104011openalex-extracted
Psychopathological networks: Theory, methods and practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2018.12.004openalex-extracted
Extending psychometric network analysis: Empirical evidence against g in favor of mutualism?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2005.06.008openalex-extracted
Model selection by normalized maximum likelihood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2008.04.013openalex-extracted
On the psychometric validity of the domains of the PDSQ: An illustration of the bi-factor item response theory model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.013openalex-extracted
Five-factor inventories have a major general factor related to social desirability which can be reduced by framing items neutrally
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.10.005openalex-extracted
The measurement equivalence of Big-Five factor markers for persons with different levels of education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.11.006openalex-extracted
Measurement equivalence of the Big Five: Shedding further light on potential causes of the educational bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.05.001openalex-extracted
The ubiquity of common method variance: The case of the Big Five
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.010openalex-extracted
Consistency of extreme response style and non-extreme response style across traits
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.06.006openalex-extracted
Are fluctuations in personality states more than fluctuations in affect?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.04.010openalex-extracted
Validity of evaluative factors from Big Five and HEXACO questionnaires
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003openalex-extracted
Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.026openalex-extracted
Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007openalex-extracted
Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.01.011openalex-extracted
Goldberg’s ‘IPIP’ Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.018openalex-extracted
Individual differences in response scale use: Mixed Rasch modelling of responses to NEO-FFI items
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.010openalex-extracted
Are acquiescent and extreme response styles related to low intelligence and education?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.10.017openalex-extracted
Probing item social desirability by correlating personality items with Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): A validity examination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.018openalex-extracted
Taxometric analyses of higher-order personality domains
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111039openalex-extracted
The net worth of networks and extraversion: Examining personality structure through network models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.07.015openalex-extracted
Why most published research findings are false
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-2140(01)00133-3openalex-extracted
Asking Questions About Behavior: Cognition, Communication, and Questionnaire Construction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291716001653openalex-extracted
Neuroticism's prospective association with mental disorders halves after adjustment for baseline symptoms and psychiatric history, but the adjusted association hardly decays with time: a meta-analysis on 59 longitudinal/prospective studies with 443 313 participants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000658openalex-extracted
Questions about networks, measurement, and causation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000762openalex-extracted
Extending the network perspective on comorbidity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000786openalex-extracted
Is there a contradiction between the network and latent variable perspectives?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x10000920openalex-extracted
Complex realities require complex theories: Refining and extending the network approach to mental disorders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.63openalex-extracted
Higher-Order Factors in a Five-Factor Personality Inventory and its Relation to Social Desirability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000138openalex-extracted
Social Desirability in Personality Inventories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000377openalex-extracted
Meta-Analytic Investigations of the HEXACO Personality Inventory(-Revised)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.48.1.26openalex-extracted
The structure of phenotypic personality traits.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509openalex-extracted
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.940openalex-extracted
Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216openalex-extracted
An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.66.1.141openalex-extracted
Separating description and evaluation in the structure of personality attributes.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.69.2.300openalex-extracted
The Big Seven model: A cross-cultural replication and further exploration of the basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.4.1.26openalex-extracted
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879openalex-extracted
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.4.718openalex-extracted
The developmental psychometrics of big five self-reports: Acquiescence, factor structure, coherence, and differentiation from ages 10 to 20.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.113.4.842openalex-extracted
A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.359openalex-extracted
An evaluation of evaluative personality terms: A comparison of the Big Seven and Five-factor model in predicting psychopathology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021504openalex-extracted
Assessing the impact of common method variance on higher order multidimensional constructs.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025169openalex-extracted
Would introverts be better off if they acted more like extraverts? Exploring emotional and cognitive consequences of counterdispositional behavior.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029061openalex-extracted
A generalizability analysis of score consistency for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033323openalex-extracted
The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039542openalex-extracted
A descriptivist approach to trait conceptualization and inference.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000455openalex-extracted
Introduction to the special section on increasing replicability, transparency, and openness in clinical psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000618openalex-extracted
Neuroticism and reward-related ventral striatum activity: Probing vulnerability to stress-related depression.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000704openalex-extracted
Network models of posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000336openalex-extracted
Does centrality in a cross-sectional network suggest intervention targets for social anxiety disorder?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027713openalex-extracted
Affective and denotative structures of personality ratings.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040372openalex-extracted
Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016openalex-extracted
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057198openalex-extracted
Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0057276openalex-extracted
The description of personality. I. Foundations of trait measurement.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360openalex-extracted
Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0099275openalex-extracted
Intertwinement of individualist and collectivist attributes and response sets.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000220openalex-extracted
Worse than measurement error: Consequences of inappropriate latent variable measurement models.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000422openalex-extracted
Parsimony in model selection: Tools for assessing fit propensity.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000439openalex-extracted
Which estimation method to choose in network psychometrics? Deriving guidelines for applied researchers.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000555openalex-extracted
A general Monte Carlo method for sample size analysis in the context of network models.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000151openalex-extracted
Cognitive ability, acquiescence, and the structure of personality in a sample of older adults.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626openalex-extracted
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.513295openalex-extracted
The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, Trait Version: Does It Really Measure Anxiety?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.645934openalex-extracted
An Item Response Theory Analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2017.1406362openalex-extracted
Assessing the Evaluative Content of Personality Questionnaires Using Bifactor Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9924470openalex-extracted
Reviving the Problem of Acquiescent Response Bias
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555openalex-extracted
The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1309262openalex-extracted
On the Complexity of Item Response Theory Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2018.1469966openalex-extracted
A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1575716openalex-extracted
On Nonregularized Estimation of Psychological Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2019.1672515openalex-extracted
Latent Variable Models and Networks: Statistical Equivalence and Testability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2020.1746903openalex-extracted
On the Importance of Estimating Parameter Uncertainty in Network Psychometrics: A Response to Forbes et al. (2019)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1938959openalex-extracted
Relations between Networks, Regression, Partial Correlation, and the Latent Variable Model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2020.1853461openalex-extracted
Lack of Theory Building and Testing Impedes Progress in The Factor and Network Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800903377264openalex-extracted
The role of neuroticism and extraversion in the stress–anxiety and stress–depression relationships
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2074422openalex-extracted
Residual Structural Equation Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118openalex-extracted
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2010.550680openalex-extracted
The effect of response style bias on the measurement of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0081-1750.00052openalex-extracted
9. Structural Equation Modeling with Robust Covariances
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bmsp.12173openalex-extracted
Back to the basics: Rethinking partial correlation network methodology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01374.xopenalex-extracted
Some relationships among sex, anxiety, and conservatism of judgment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12380openalex-extracted
Big Five Personality Traits, Political Participation, and Civic Engagement: Evidence from 24 Countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452openalex-extracted
Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135239openalex-extracted
Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085516openalex-extracted
Research on Attention Networks as a Model for the Integration of Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9424605openalex-extracted
Expanding Network Analysis Tools in Psychological Networks: Minimal Spanning Trees, Participation Coefficients, and Motif Analysis Applied to a Network of 26 Psychological Attributes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324469openalex-extracted
Modeling Socially Desirable Responding and Its Effects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/001316444600600405openalex-extracted
Response Sets and Test Validity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104264126openalex-extracted
Response Styles in Rating Scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022104272905openalex-extracted
The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212451275openalex-extracted
The Effect of Response Style on Self-Reported Conscientiousness Across 20 Countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295212001openalex-extracted
Effects of Self-Presentation Strategies on Personality Profiles and their Structure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307301032openalex-extracted
Situating Social Influence Processes: Dynamic, Multidirectional Flows of Influence Within Social Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314523838openalex-extracted
The HEXACO Honesty-Humility, Agreeableness, and Emotionality Factors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617705892openalex-extracted
Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015621113openalex-extracted
The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding Short Form (BIDR-16)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616657069openalex-extracted
Three Concerns With Applying a Bifactor Model as a Structure of Psychopathology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_1openalex-extracted
Quantifying Parsimony in Structural Equation Modeling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15366359mea0204_1openalex-extracted
A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1214/14-sts502openalex-extracted
On the Question of Effective Sample Size in Network Modeling: An Asymptotic Inquiry
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124openalex-extracted
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167490openalex-extracted
Major Depression as a Complex Dynamic System
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179891openalex-extracted
Estimating psychopathological networks: Be careful what you wish for
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/zkaxuopenalex-extracted
Sample Size Recommendations for Estimating Cross-Sectional Network Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1417576openalex-extracted
The Description of Personality: Principles and Findings in a Factor Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1912557openalex-extracted
Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u2zdvopenalex-extracted
Parts and Wholes: A Note on Interpretation of Partial Covariance Matrices and Latent Variable Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040035openalex-extracted
How to Compare Psychometric Factor and Network Models
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1openalex-extracted
Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1055-2openalex-extracted
RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200479.n9openalex-extracted
The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203501207openalex-extracted
Frontiers of Test Validity Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5195/jyd.2009.266openalex-extracted
Youth Views of Experiences and Benefits of Public Speaking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2012.297openalex-extracted
How social desirability and acquiescence affect the age-personality relationship
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.131openalex-extracted
Is Correcting for Acquiescence Increasing the External Validity of Personality Test Scores?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027366.001.0001openalex-extracted
Investigating the Psychological World
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.52.5.509openalex-snapshot
Personality trait structure as a human universal.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.940openalex-snapshot
Attitude intensity, importance, and certainty and susceptibility to response effects.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216openalex-snapshot
An alternative "description of personality": The Big-Five factor structure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26openalex-snapshot
The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400102200202openalex-snapshot
Asking Questions About Behavior: Cognition, Communication, and Questionnaire Construction
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.