On the public citation graph
On the Dark Side of Co-Opted Boards: A Case of Accounting Controversies
0 signed · 18 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.03.025openalex-extracted
Do co-opted directors mitigate managerial myopia? Evidence from R&D investments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105263openalex-extracted
Do co-opted boards protect CEOs from ESG controversies?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2022.100716openalex-extracted
Does compliance with corporate governance increase profitability? Evidence from an emerging economy: Pakistan
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101824openalex-extracted
Co-opted boards and capital structure dynamics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137192openalex-extracted
Co-opted directors and greenhouse gas emissions: Does ESG compensation matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102066openalex-extracted
Fiduciary duty or loyalty? Evidence from co-opted boards and corporate misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.05.012openalex-extracted
Financial fraud, director reputation, and shareholder wealth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.03.005openalex-extracted
Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfaa012openalex-extracted
Corporate Governance in China: A Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12429openalex-extracted
The Monitoring Effectiveness of Co‐opted Audit Committees
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12567openalex-extracted
Board co‐option and corporate environmental orientation: New insights from the waste management perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/fima.12196openalex-extracted
Do Co-Opted Directors Influence Dividend Policy?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/fire.12243openalex-extracted
The bright side of co‐opted boards: Evidence from firm innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.xopenalex-extracted
A Theory of Friendly Boards
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jbfa.12591openalex-extracted
Do liquid assets lure managers? Evidence from corporate misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318801999openalex-extracted
Board Independence and Corporate Misconduct: A Cross-National Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.61967992openalex-extracted
Damaged Goods: Board Decisions to Dismiss Reputationally Compromised Directors
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.