On the public citation graph

Women in Economics: The Role of Gendered References at Entry in the Profession

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4837469
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9291-4openalex-extracted
A Linguistic Comparison of Letters of Recommendation for Male and Female Chemistry and Biochemistry Job Applicants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01907-xopenalex-extracted
Linguistic Biases in Letters of Recommendation for Radiation Oncology Residency Applicants from 2015 to 2019
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104323openalex-extracted
Reducing discrimination in the field: Evidence from an awareness raising intervention targeting gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2022.102212openalex-extracted
Grading bias and the leaky pipeline in economics: Evidence from Stockholm University
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.02.011openalex-extracted
An advisor like me? Advisor gender and post-graduate careers in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016539openalex-extracted
Gender and letters of recommendation for academia: Agentic and communal differences.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2819openalex-extracted
Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2118853119openalex-extracted
Underrepresentation of women in the economics profession more pronounced in the United States compared to heterogeneous Europe
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/711401openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueac032openalex-extracted
Publishing While Female: are Women Held to Higher Standards? Evidence from Peer Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/uead045openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Reference Letters: Evidence from the Economics Job Market
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaf113openalex-extracted
Research Similarity and Women in Academia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjz035openalex-extracted
Are Referees and Editors in Economics Gender Neutral?*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00241openalex-extracted
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4230openalex-extracted
Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057openalex-extracted
Gender Similarities and Differences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01356openalex-extracted
Does Economics Make You Sexist?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122419877135openalex-extracted
The Geometry of Culture: Analyzing the Meanings of Class through Word Embeddings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926503014002277openalex-extracted
Exploring the Color of Glass: Letters of Recommendation for Female and Male Medical Faculty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141734openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Accepting and Receiving Requests for Tasks with Low Promotability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151211openalex-extracted
Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.97.2.422openalex-extracted
Women Helping Women, Men Helping Women? Same-Gender Mentoring, Initial Job Placements, and Early Career Publishing Success for Economics PhDs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20171126openalex-extracted
Recognition for Group Work: Gender Differences in Academia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.4.221openalex-extracted
Diversity in the Economics Profession: A New Attack on an Old Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.33.1.3openalex-extracted
Women in Economics: Stalled Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.113.815openalex-extracted
Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211028openalex-extracted
Gender Differences in Fields of Specialization and Placement Outcomes among PhDs in Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211030openalex-extracted
Field Specializations among Beginning Economists: Are There Gender Differences?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211085openalex-extracted
Gendered Citations at Top Economic Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20211086openalex-extracted
Confidence Men? Evidence on Confidence and Gender among Top Economists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01637openalex-extracted
Gender Quotas in Hiring Committees: A Boon or a Bane for Women?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.1635openalex-extracted
Reject and Resubmit: A Formal Analysis of Gender Differences in Reapplication and Their Contribution to Women’s Presence in Talent Pipelines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145146openalex-extracted
Gender and the Publication Output of Graduate Students: A Case Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.17548openalex-extracted
Publishing while Female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2628176openalex-extracted
Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3484533openalex-extracted
Gender Stereotypes in Professor-Student Interactions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3628247openalex-extracted
Evidence for a Two-Women Quota in University Departments Across Disciplines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3795012openalex-extracted
Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4651052openalex-extracted
Gender Diversity and Diversity of Ideas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/146320openalex-extracted
Women Helping Women? Role Model and Mentoring Effects on Female Ph.D. Students in Economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/797509openalex-extracted
Institutional Racism: Judicial Conduct and a New Theory of Racial Discrimination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w29436openalex-extracted
Women in Science. Lessons from the Baby Boom
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.19580abstractopenalex-extracted
Potential and the Gender Promotion Gap
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w28494openalex-snapshot
Gender and the Dynamics of Economics Seminars
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.