On the public citation graph

Framing Affects Post-Decision Preferences Through Self-Preference Inferences (and Probably not Dissonance)

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896290
0 signed · 67 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1036openalex-extracted
Attribute Scatter and Decision Outcome: Judgment versus Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(72)90076-5openalex-extracted
Dissonance awareness: A test of dissonance theory versus self-perception theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(75)90051-7openalex-extracted
On the inconclusiveness of “crucial” cognitive tests of dissonance versus self-perception theories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90031-2openalex-extracted
Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(91)90001-mopenalex-extracted
Feature matching, unique features, and the dynamics of the choice process: Predecision conflict and postdecision satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.007openalex-extracted
Goals and Habits in the Brain
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.002openalex-extracted
Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.01.028openalex-extracted
Competing roles for the subfactors of need for closure in moderating dissonance-produced attitude change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60024-6openalex-extracted
Self-Perception Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60107-0openalex-extracted
From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-2681(96)00860-8openalex-extracted
Object valence as a moderator of the framing effect on risk preference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1477-3880(15)30073-6openalex-extracted
Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x19001730openalex-extracted
Rationalization is rational
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x19002243openalex-extracted
What kind of rationalization is system justification?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s193029750000070xopenalex-extracted
Speakers' choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0000135-001openalex-extracted
An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.294openalex-extracted
Self-knowledge and social inference: II. The diagnosticity of cognitive/affective and behavioral data.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.382openalex-extracted
On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049openalex-extracted
Individual differences in need for cognitive closure.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.845openalex-extracted
Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383openalex-extracted
Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/10318-001openalex-extracted
An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/10780-000openalex-extracted
Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323openalex-extracted
Bad is Stronger than Good
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020217openalex-extracted
How choice affects and reflects preferences: Revisiting the free-choice paradigm.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021150openalex-extracted
Transitivity of preferences.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e519682015-090openalex-extracted
Turning the Page: The Impact of Choice Closure on Satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020916openalex-extracted
Testing the Self-Perception Explanation of Dissonance Phenomena: On the Salience of Premanipulation Attitudes.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835openalex-extracted
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225openalex-extracted
The processes of causal attribution.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036205openalex-extracted
Dissonance and self-perception analysis of "forced compliance": When two theories make competing predictions.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040372openalex-extracted
Yeasayers and naysayers: Agreeing response set as a personality variable.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040493openalex-extracted
Re-evaluation of choice alternatives as a function of their number and qualitative similarity.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041006openalex-extracted
Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593openalex-extracted
Cognitive consequences of forced compliance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0092987openalex-extracted
Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000092openalex-extracted
Rejecting a bad option feels like choosing a good one.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000263openalex-extracted
Choice changes preferences, not merely reflects them: A meta-analysis of the artifact-free free-choice paradigm.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000107openalex-extracted
Fast but not intuitive, slow but not reflective: Decision conflict drives reaction times in social dilemmas.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000663openalex-extracted
99% impossible: A valid, or falsifiable, internal meta-analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican1062-93openalex-extracted
Cognitive Dissonance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011879108openalex-extracted
Neural correlates of cognitive dissonance and choice-induced preference change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/208925openalex-extracted
An Attribution Explanation of the Disproportionate Influence of Unfavorable Information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/209477openalex-extracted
The Effect of Common and Unique Features in Consumer Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/374701openalex-extracted
Option Attachment: When Deliberating Makes Choosing Feel like Losing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/659040openalex-extracted
Choice, Rejection, and Elaboration on Preference-Inconsistent Alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/670252openalex-extracted
Turning the Page: The Impact of Choice Closure on Satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/64.2.191openalex-extracted
Group Sequential Methods in the Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad007openalex-extracted
Rejections Are More Contagious than Choices: How Another’s Decisions Shape Our Own
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucw049openalex-extracted
Take It or Leave It: How Choosing versus Rejecting Alternatives Affects Information Processing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucy025openalex-extracted
Seeking and Avoiding Choice Closure to Enhance Outcome Satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199251063.003.0006openalex-extracted
Self-Signaling and Diagnostic Utility in Everyday Decision Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01417.xopenalex-extracted
Choice difficulty, dissonance, and the decision sequence1
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683openalex-extracted
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289001openalex-extracted
Testing the Action-Based Model of Cognitive Dissonance: The Effect of Action Orientation on Postdecisional Attitudes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283091006openalex-extracted
Whatever Became of Consistency Theory?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299025001004openalex-extracted
Free Choice and Cognitive Dissonance Revisited: Choosing “Lesser Evils” Versus “Greater Goods”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0604_03openalex-extracted
Structural Dynamics of Cognition: From Consistency Theories to Constraint Satisfaction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.1.60.18718openalex-extracted
Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.10.0490openalex-extracted
Self-Signaling and the Costs and Benefits of Temptation in Consumer Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766openalex-extracted
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/xesgfopenalex-extracted
What kind of rationalization is system justification?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00041openalex-extracted
Choice-Induced Preference Change in the Free-Choice Paradigm: A Critical Methodological Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197186openalex-extracted
Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03204403openalex-extracted
Words high and low in pleasantness as rated by male and female college students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211332openalex-extracted
Another look at reasons for choosing and rejecting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3openalex-extracted
Introducing the Open Affective Standardized Image Set (OASIS)
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.