On the public citation graph

Another look at reasons for choosing and rejecting

https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03211332
0 signed · 76 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1036openalex-snapshot
Attribute Scatter and Decision Outcome: Judgment versus Choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)00004-zopenalex-snapshot
The influence of quantity of information and goal framing on decision
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90034-sopenalex-snapshot
Reason-based choice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(87)90083-5openalex-snapshot
The statistical program SYSTAT
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511598951.011openalex-snapshot
RATIONAL CHOICE AND THE FRAMING OF DECISIONS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511609220.014openalex-snapshot
Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.3.390openalex-snapshot
Contrast effects in attitude judgment: An examination of the accentuation hypothesis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.38.5.689openalex-snapshot
Polarized appraisals of out-group members.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.884openalex-snapshot
The self and social judgment: Effects of affective reaction and "own position" on judgments of unambiguous and ambiguous information about others.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.94.2.236openalex-snapshot
Expression theory and the preference reversal phenomena.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.17.4.767openalex-snapshot
Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.371openalex-snapshot
Contingent weighting in judgment and choice.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036014openalex-snapshot
The nonadditivity of personality impressions.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/208899openalex-snapshot
Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity and the Similarity Hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/296365openalex-snapshot
Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00678.xopenalex-snapshot
The Disjunction Effect in Choice under Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.2.iopenalex-snapshot
The American Economic Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1422202openalex-snapshot
Foundations of Information Integration Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1911299openalex-snapshot
Individual Choice Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185openalex-snapshot
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197186openalex-snapshot
Choosing versus rejecting: Why some options are both better and worse than others

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4896290openalex-extracted
Framing Affects Post-Decision Preferences Through Self-Preference Inferences (and Probably not Dissonance)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2199openalex-snapshot
Choosing what to choose from: Preference for inclusion over exclusion when constructing consideration sets from large choice sets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2221openalex-snapshot
Advice to friends in want/should conflicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.70032openalex-snapshot
Choosing Versus Rejecting: The Effect of Decision Mode on Subsequent Preferential Choices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.653openalex-snapshot
Selective exposure: The impact of framing information search instructions as gains and losses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1222openalex-snapshot
The Differentiation Principle: Why Consumers Often Neglect Positive Attributes of Novel Food Products
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2881openalex-snapshot
Information Processing at Successive Stages of Decision Making: Need for Cognition and Inclusion–Exclusion Effects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-009-9079-0openalex-snapshot
Making choices under conflict: The impact of decision frames
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-023-09706-2openalex-snapshot
More of the same: Painful payment methods decrease variety seeking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0445-xopenalex-snapshot
How you know you are not a brain in a vat
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2019.104410openalex-snapshot
Choosing or rejecting a food item, does framing matter? And what has sugar to do with it!
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.005openalex-snapshot
The powerful select, the powerless reject: Power's influence in decision strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocm.2015.04.001openalex-snapshot
Using facial EMG and eye tracking to study integral affect in discrete choice experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.01.005openalex-snapshot
The Assimilative and Contrastive Effects of Word-of-Mouth Volume: An Experimental Examination of Online Consumer Ratings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.12.002openalex-snapshot
Binary choice under instructions to select versus reject
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00006-7openalex-snapshot
Negative-based prominence: the role of negative features in matching and choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2017.32openalex-snapshot
HOW TO SOLVE HUME'S PROBLEM OF INDUCTION
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2023.48openalex-snapshot
Choosing, rejecting, and closely replicating, 30 years later: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.26openalex-snapshot
Accentuation explains the difference between choice and rejection better than compatibility: A commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2025.10011openalex-snapshot
On the process and value of direct close replications: A rejoinder to Shafir and Cheek’s (2024) commentary on Chandrashekar et al. (2021)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s193029750000070xopenalex-snapshot
Speakers' choice of frame in binary choice: Effects of recommendation mode and option attractiveness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500008299openalex-snapshot
Accentuation and compatibility: Replication and extensions of Shafir (1993) to rethink choosing versus rejecting paradigms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1024//1421-0185.61.1.21openalex-snapshot
Preference reversal in decision making: The attraction effect in choice and rejection 1The research was funded by a 60% grant of the University of Padua. The authors wish to thank Sandro Bettella for his invaluable technical assistance.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000617openalex-snapshot
Framing the Default
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000469openalex-snapshot
Forbid/Allow Asymmetry in Persuasion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1533015x.2018.1456380openalex-snapshot
Love or Loss: Effective message framing to promote environmental conservation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/432241openalex-snapshot
Losers, Winners, and Biased Trades
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/521903openalex-snapshot
Attribute Conflict in Consumer Decision Making: The Role of Task Compatibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0016openalex-snapshot
Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-06-2013-0294openalex-snapshot
Segmenting consumers’ reasons for and against ethical consumption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/md-01-2023-0049openalex-snapshot
Make me happy, make it credible – the effect of CSR message framing on online brand engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2024.3459032openalex-snapshot
Selecting-the-Best vs. Eliminating-the-Worst: An Experimental Investigation of Idea Evaluation Processes Under Cognitive Bias Conditions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/aen.70114openalex-snapshot
Behavioural and Physiological Evidence of Monandry in the Tomato Fruit Borer, Neoleucinodes elegantalis (Guen.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0047287518794316openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Decision Task on the Magnitude of Decoy and Compromise Effects in a Travel Decision
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0047287519841718openalex-snapshot
Influence of Choice Architecture on the Preference for a Pro-Environmental Hotel
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00472875231219634openalex-snapshot
Viewer In-Consumption Engagement in Pro-Environmental Tourism Videos: A Video Analytics Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206296954openalex-snapshot
The Attractiveness of Enriched and Impoverished Options
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0260106019850997openalex-snapshot
When virtue is not an option: Decision making in unhealthy food choices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918814812openalex-snapshot
The Workings of Choosing and Rejecting: Commentary on Many Labs 2
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0434openalex-snapshot
Improving Preference Assessment: Limiting the Effect of Context Through Pre-exposure to Attribute Levels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2023.00913openalex-snapshot
Why Context Influences Preferences Elicited with Willingness to Pay Less Than Preferences Elicited with Choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2014.12.12.233openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Bundle Framing on Purchase Intention
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.2.234openalex-snapshot
Ethical Decisions and Response Mode Compatibility: Weighting of Ethical Attributes in Consideration Sets Formed by excluding versus Including Product Alternatives
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15626/mp.2022.3108openalex-snapshot
Defaults versus framing: Revisiting Default Effect and Framing Effect with replications and extensions of Johnson and Goldstein (2003) and Johnson, Bellman, and Lohse (2002)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19066/cogsci.2009.20.2.005openalex-snapshot
Re-examination of Response Compatability Hypothesis in Decision-Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.19090/pp.2016.1.83-100openalex-snapshot
INFLUENCE OF THE PROBABILTY LEVEL ON THE FRAMING EFFECT IN REFERENCE POINT OF LOSS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2008.9.3.383openalex-snapshot
Comparison of consumers' cognitive and affective responses in positive and negative choices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2012.13.3.443openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Compatibility of Message Framing and Focused Alternative on Consumer’s Attitude Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1198617/v2openalex-snapshot
Preference for Experiential or Material Purchases?The Impact of Message Framing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s386917openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Power on Consumer Decision Strategies: The Mediating Role of Behavioral Approach-Inhibition Tendency and the Moderating Role of Gender
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2501/s0021849907070377openalex-snapshot
Message Framing Strategy for Brand Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/asd3vopenalex-snapshot
Framing the Default: Influence of Choosing vs Rejecting Frame on Default Effects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1042.2021.01010openalex-snapshot
How can a selected and a rejected option turn out to be the same one?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6100/ir555249openalex-snapshot
Explaining asymmetries in preference elicitation : the role of negative attributes in judgment and choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.6100/ir631570openalex-snapshot
Talking frames:the assessment, use, and impact of message frames in conversational perspective
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.