On the public citation graph
Why psychopathy might be present and prosperous in present-day psychological science
0 signed · 67 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1993.03500070075032openalex-snapshot
Defining Scientific Misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21897openalex-snapshot
Identifying and dealing with functional psychopathic behavior in higher education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34920-1_3openalex-snapshot
A Simple Model of Citation Cartels: When Self-interest Strikes Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_3openalex-snapshot
Excellence by Nonsense: The Competition for Publications in Modern Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0963-1openalex-snapshot
Successful Psychopaths: Are They Unethical Decision-Makers and Why?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3368-3openalex-snapshot
The Effects of the Dark Triad on Unethical Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11233-023-09124-zopenalex-snapshot
Bullying in higher education: an endemic problem?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9042-5openalex-snapshot
The Perverse Effects of Competition on Scientists’ Work and Relationships
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2020.101473openalex-snapshot
The classification of psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2021.101650openalex-snapshot
The need for domination in psychopathic leadership: A clarification for the estimated high prevalence of psychopathic leaders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsiml.2022.100076openalex-snapshot
A systematic review on the current conceptualisations of successful psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2009.04.002openalex-snapshot
Psychopathy and instrumental aggression: Evolutionary, neurobiological, and legal perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2010.05.010openalex-snapshot
The search for the successful psychopath
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.027openalex-snapshot
Big Five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.001openalex-snapshot
Psychopathic personality traits predict competitive wins and cooperative losses in negotiation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.11.059openalex-snapshot
Psychopathy and risk taking: Examining the role of risk perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.020openalex-snapshot
Social status as one key indicator of successful psychopathy: An initial empirical investigation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.004openalex-snapshot
The extent and causes of academic text recycling or ‘self-plagiarism’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-6566(02)00505-6openalex-snapshot
The Dark Triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00038-6openalex-snapshot
Psychopathic attributes and achievement dispositions in a college sample
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700041969openalex-snapshot
Psychopathic personality: a most elusive category
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954579409000492openalex-snapshot
Triarchic conceptualization of psychopathy: Developmental origins of disinhibition, boldness, and meanness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1930297500001662openalex-snapshot
Moral identity in psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000356openalex-snapshot
Scientific Misconduct in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108openalex-snapshot
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021524openalex-snapshot
Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025172openalex-snapshot
Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem's (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029487openalex-snapshot
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1994.11778502openalex-snapshot
Scientific Misconduct and Editorial and Peer Review Processes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029208629515openalex-snapshot
SCIENTIFIC FRAUD AND THE POWER STRUCTURE OF SCIENCE
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1820126openalex-snapshot
Research fraud: a long-term problem exacerbated by the clamour for research grants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2016.0223openalex-snapshot
Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160384openalex-snapshot
The natural selection of bad science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/sbr-05-2021-0060openalex-snapshot
Finding psychopaths in white-collar jobs: a review of the evidence and why it matters
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12118openalex-snapshot
Psychopathy Deconstructed and Reconstructed: Identifying and Assembling the Personality Building Blocks of Cleckley's Chimera
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12170openalex-snapshot
Understanding Psychopathy Using the Basic Elements of Personality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540openalex-snapshot
Coercive Citation in Academic Publishing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adp7470openalex-snapshot
Embattled Harvard honesty professor accused of plagiarism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2004.010553openalex-snapshot
The White Bull effect: abusive coauthorship and publication parasitism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.038125openalex-snapshot
Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900414openalex-snapshot
Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516669168openalex-snapshot
Psychopathic Traits and the Cheater–Hawk Hypothesis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315321990760openalex-snapshot
Short-Term Internationally Mobile Academics and Their Research Collaborations Upon Return: Insights From the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612457576openalex-snapshot
Science or Art? How Aesthetic Standards Grease the Way Through the Publication Bottleneck but Undermine Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060openalex-snapshot
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460688openalex-snapshot
Replications in Psychology Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612464056openalex-snapshot
Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618790227openalex-snapshot
Dark Pathways to Achievement in Science: Researchers’ Achievement Goals Predict Engagement in Questionable Research Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1604_3openalex-snapshot
Misconduct in the Analysis and Reporting of Data: Bridging Methodological and Ethical Agendas for Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124openalex-snapshot
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738openalex-snapshot
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068openalex-snapshot
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163251openalex-snapshot
Personality Traits Are Associated with Research Misbehavior in Dutch Scientists: A Cross-Sectional Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172792openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187394openalex-snapshot
Authorship and citation manipulation in academic research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304342openalex-snapshot
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2017.36.2.108openalex-snapshot
Values, Goals, and Motivations Associated with Psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.88.1.125openalex-snapshot
Preventing scientific misconduct.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/wkjrmopenalex-snapshot
A systematic review on the current conceptualisations of successful psychopathy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0227-9openalex-snapshot
Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.