On the public citation graph

Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172792
0 signed · 218 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22636openalex-snapshot
Intended and unintended consequences of a publish‐or‐perish culture: A worldwide survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7openalex-snapshot
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7openalex-snapshot
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.001openalex-snapshot
The meaning of “significance” for different types of research [translated and annotated by Eric-Jan Wagenmakers, Denny Borsboom, Josine Verhagen, Rogier Kievit, Marjan Bakker, Angelique Cramer, Dora Matzke, Don Mellenbergh, and Han L. J. van der Maas]
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.12.016openalex-snapshot
Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.008openalex-snapshot
Write less, write well
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.006openalex-snapshot
Quantitative analysis of the Italian National Scientific Qualification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.05.002openalex-snapshot
Scientific misbehavior in economics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010openalex-snapshot
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.45.12.1304openalex-snapshot
Things I have learned (so far).
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/002660openalex-snapshot
Responsible science: Ensuring the integrity of the research process.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.9.2.147openalex-snapshot
The Persistence of Underpowered Studies in Psychological Research: Causes, Consequences, and Remedies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/14136-000openalex-snapshot
Beyond significance testing: Statistics reform in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.).
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/14805-033openalex-snapshot
False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022790openalex-snapshot
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: The case of psi: Comment on Bem (2011).
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029487openalex-snapshot
The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e519702015-014openalex-snapshot
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/e632032012-001openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth-Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/435737aopenalex-snapshot
Scientists behaving badly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/533147aopenalex-snapshot
The pressure to publish pushes down quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1302997110openalex-snapshot
US studies may overestimate effect sizes in softer research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1322149111openalex-snapshot
Standard analyses fail to show that US studies overestimate effect sizes in softer research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2014.944731openalex-snapshot
Bibliometric Evaluation of Researchers in the Internet Age
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754openalex-snapshot
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093735openalex-snapshot
Sample Size Planning for Statistical Power and Accuracy in Parameter Estimation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314527133openalex-snapshot
The Chrysalis Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632openalex-snapshot
False-Positive Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616647519openalex-snapshot
Researchers’ Intuitions About Power in Psychological Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x0001200406openalex-snapshot
Using Guttman Scaling to Rank Wealth: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058openalex-snapshot
Scientific Utopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459060openalex-snapshot
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078openalex-snapshot
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612465253openalex-snapshot
Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613491437openalex-snapshot
PsychDisclosure.org
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615582201openalex-snapshot
Introduction to the Special Section on Methods: Odds and End
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616650874openalex-snapshot
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615598377openalex-snapshot
Underreporting in Psychology Experiments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0203_4openalex-snapshot
HARKing: Hypothesizing After the Results are Known
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124openalex-snapshot
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738openalex-snapshot
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068openalex-snapshot
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026828openalex-snapshot
Willingness to Share Research Data Is Related to the Strength of the Evidence and the Quality of Reporting of Statistical Results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114255openalex-snapshot
Excess Success for Psychology Articles in the Journal Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0114876openalex-snapshot
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1421/77194openalex-snapshot
La crisi internazionale di credibilità della psicologia come un'opportunità di crescita: Problemi e possibili soluzioni
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1421/79851openalex-snapshot
Life of P: 16 years of statistics on the Italian Journal of Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1525/jer.2007.2.4.3openalex-snapshot
Normative Dissonance in Science: Results from a National Survey of U.S. Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.21225/d5g01topenalex-snapshot
Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2172/1126508openalex-snapshot
Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2086306openalex-snapshot
A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3109/07380577.2011.629024openalex-snapshot
Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194105openalex-snapshot
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0089-5openalex-snapshot
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0664-2openalex-snapshot
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985–2013)

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4110803openalex-extracted
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4176916openalex-extracted
Making the Most of Tenure in Two Acts: An Additional Way to Help Change Incentives in Psychological Science?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4176925openalex-extracted
The Natural Selection of Bad Psychological Scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6330openalex-snapshot
The role of replication studies in ecology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12632openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices among Brazilian psychological researchers: Results from a replication study and an international comparison
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leg3.170openalex-snapshot
Effect of drying on kinetics, physiochemical, and antioxidant properties of black gram nuggets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20020-6_1openalex-snapshot
Best-Practice Guidelines for Positive Psychological Intervention Research Design
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41964-6_30openalex-snapshot
Sentence Writing Test for Parkinson Disease Modeling: Comparing Predictive Ability of Classifiers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_17openalex-snapshot
Assessing and Improving Robustness of Psychological Research Findings in Four Steps
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43292-7_10openalex-snapshot
Researching Academic Integrity: Application of Social Sciences Research Methods
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73435-4_2openalex-snapshot
What Is Research Misconduct?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-23397-6_11openalex-snapshot
Die Arbeitsweise der Forschung zu Zeiten von Digitalisierung und Reproduzierbarkeitskrise: Neue Methoden, alte Probleme
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-48013-4_2openalex-snapshot
Grundlagen der Entscheidungsfindung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-73259-5_2openalex-snapshot
Replikationskrise und Open Science in der klinischen Psychologie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9240-7_5openalex-snapshot
Reducing Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04961-7openalex-snapshot
Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09520-zopenalex-snapshot
Minimizing Questionable Research Practices – The Role of Norms, Counter Norms, and Micro-Organizational Ethics Discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-024-09565-0openalex-snapshot
Developing Surveys on Questionable Research Practices: Four Challenging Design Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09695-3openalex-snapshot
Study Preregistration: An Evaluation of a Method for Transparent Reporting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-021-09525-6openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11533-1openalex-snapshot
An insight into the current oil spills and on-site bioremediation approaches to contaminated sites in Nigeria
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00314-9openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of Research Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-026-00589-wopenalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices: A Principled Classification and Ranking Based on Survey Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02797-6openalex-snapshot
Exploring COVID-19 research credibility among Spanish scientists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-022-01749-1openalex-snapshot
Proposal of a Selection Protocol for Replication of Studies in Sports and Exercise Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-025-02201-wopenalex-snapshot
Estimating the Replicability of Sports and Exercise Science Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40881-022-00123-1openalex-snapshot
A Practical Guide to Registered Reports for Economists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104005openalex-snapshot
The trustworthiness of the cumulative knowledge in industrial/organizational psychology: The current state of affairs and a path forward
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2024.10.001openalex-snapshot
On the road with Cortex
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.07.002openalex-snapshot
Creative destruction in science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.psfr.2020.09.001openalex-snapshot
Les pratiques de recherche ouvertes en psychologie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.103930openalex-snapshot
Using retracted journal articles in psychology to understand research misconduct in the social sciences: What is to be done?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100064openalex-snapshot
On the frequency, prevalence, and perceived severity of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100124openalex-snapshot
Arbitrary choices, arbitrary results: Three cases of multiverse analysis in L2 research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616669.012openalex-snapshot
Notes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17001972openalex-snapshot
Making replication mainstream
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x18000791openalex-snapshot
Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728922000256openalex-snapshot
How open science can benefit bilingualism research: A lesson in six tales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000562openalex-snapshot
Replikationskrise, p-hacking und Open Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000356openalex-snapshot
Scientific Misconduct in Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128openalex-snapshot
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/met0000406openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of inequality constrained hypotheses using a generalization of the AIC.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/met0000438openalex-snapshot
Deciding what to replicate: A decision model for replication study selection under resource and knowledge constraints.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1037/met0000559openalex-snapshot
Meta-analyzing the multiverse: A peek under the hood of selective reporting.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09941-0openalex-snapshot
The problem with unadjusted multiple and sequential statistical testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-37039-1openalex-snapshot
Method Reporting with Initials for Transparency (MeRIT) promotes more granularity and accountability for author contributions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42121-1openalex-snapshot
Biomedical doctoral students’ research practices when facing dilemmas: two vignette-based randomized control trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2openalex-snapshot
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.00048.steopenalex-snapshot
Investigating researcher perceptions of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2022.2131625openalex-snapshot
The State of Play of Reproducibility in Statistics: An Empirical Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1568377openalex-snapshot
Expanding Statistical Frontiers in Sexual Science: Taxometric, Invariance, and Equivalence Testing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1902329openalex-snapshot
Improving norms in research culture to incentivize transparency and rigor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2044318openalex-snapshot
Jumping with a parachute – is promoting research integrity meaningful?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2024.2318230openalex-snapshot
Bad apples or systematic problem? Is Italy struggling with maintaining high level of research integrity?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2457100openalex-snapshot
Open minds, tied hands: Awareness, behavior, and reasoning on open science and irresponsible research behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2018.1496081openalex-snapshot
Results-blind review: a masked crusader for science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2024.2367613openalex-snapshot
Selective outcome reporting in trials of behavioural health interventions in health psychology and behavioural medicine journals: a review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2376046openalex-snapshot
The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab6d38openalex-snapshot
Lichen cover mapping for caribou ranges in interior Alaska and Yukon
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab031openalex-snapshot
Questionable and Open Research Practices: Attitudes and Perceptions among Quantitative Communication Researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Is Science in Crisis?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0010openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200048openalex-snapshot
What do participants think of our research practices? An examination of behavioural psychology participants' preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1101/2025.09.23.25336497openalex-snapshot
Replicability and transparency in physical therapy research: Time to wake up
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1103/physrevphyseducres.16.010113openalex-snapshot
How expectations of confirmation influence students’ experimentation decisions in introductory labs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12534openalex-snapshot
HARKing can be good for science: Why, when, and how c/should we Hypothesizing After Results are Known or Proposing research questions After Results are Known
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/joop.70057openalex-snapshot
Going off script: Exploring the reporting of preregistration deviations in Industrial and Organizational Psychology and their relationship with questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12302openalex-snapshot
Trust in Numbers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918821076openalex-snapshot
Three Changes Public Health Scientists Can Make to Help Build a Culture of Reproducible Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220903896openalex-snapshot
Gray (Literature) Matters: Evidence of Selective Hypothesis Reporting in Social Psychological Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251375992openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of Single-Case Experimental Design Researchers About Questionable and Improved Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211050354openalex-snapshot
When Shooting for the Stars Becomes Aiming for Asterisks: P -Hacking in Family Business Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221121117openalex-snapshot
Preregistration of Randomized Controlled Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618792621openalex-snapshot
Research Misconduct in Business and Management Studies: Causes, Consequences, and Possible Remedies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1359105320963542openalex-snapshot
Research misconduct complaints and institutional logics: The case of Hans Eysenck and the British Psychological Society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1556264619894435openalex-snapshot
Ethical Consistency and Experience: An Attempt to Influence Researcher Attitudes Toward Questionable Research Practices Through Reading Prompts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618810693openalex-snapshot
Making Research Evaluation More Transparent: Aligning Research Philosophy, Institutional Values, and Reporting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619838258openalex-snapshot
Lessons From Pinocchio: Cues to Deception May Be Highly Exaggerated
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221101060openalex-snapshot
Reckoning With Our Crisis: An Agenda for the Field of Social and Personality Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459211007467openalex-snapshot
An Excess of Positive Results: Comparing the Standard Psychology Literature With Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221120217openalex-snapshot
Journal N-Pact Factors From 2011 to 2019: Evaluating the Quality of Social/Personality Journals With Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/25152459251348431openalex-snapshot
Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01004-4openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices of medical and dental faculty in Pakistan – a confession
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-025-02134-wopenalex-snapshot
Poor hypotheses and research waste in biology: learning from a theory crisis in psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0085-3openalex-snapshot
Testing an active intervention to deter researchers’ use of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1214/23-sts904openalex-snapshot
Replication Success Under Questionable Research Practices—a Simulation Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000937openalex-snapshot
Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175583openalex-snapshot
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199554openalex-snapshot
Self-reports from behind the scenes: Questionable research practices and rates of replication in ego depletion research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202447openalex-snapshot
Use of reproducible research practices in public health: A survey of public health analysts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203470openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices in student final theses – Prevalence, attitudes, and the role of the supervisor’s perceived attitudes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208631openalex-snapshot
The quest for an optimal alpha
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236079openalex-snapshot
Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304342openalex-snapshot
Is something rotten in the state of Denmark? Cross-national evidence for widespread involvement but not systematic use of questionable research practices across all fields of research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339056openalex-snapshot
The ‘shades of grey’ in research integrity—Researchers admit to questionable research practices that they do not perceive to be serious
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355938openalex-snapshot
The effect of manuscript characteristics on quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2024.86.4.14openalex-snapshot
Wpływ eliminacji odpowiedzi nieuważnych respondentów na replikację wyników badań w naukach społecznych
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0017-22.2022openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.102openalex-snapshot
Journal Data Sharing Policies and Statistical Reporting Inconsistencies in Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15626/mp.2020.2601openalex-snapshot
Better Understanding the Population Size and Stigmatization of Psychologists Using Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15626/mp.2021.2837openalex-snapshot
Means to valuable exploration: I. The blending of confirmation and exploration and how to resolve it
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15659/ttad.15.1.170openalex-snapshot
Veri Toplamaya Hala Gerek Var Mı? Yoksa Ulusal Pazarlama Akademisi HARKING Tehlikesi Altında Mı?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020250610xopenalex-snapshot
DA CONDUTA ÉTICA À CIÊNCIA RESPONSÁVEL NA PESQUISA EM ADMINISTRAÇÃO
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5166553openalex-snapshot
Why psychopathy might be present and prosperous in present-day psychological science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21428/cb6ab371.0d3ec44fopenalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21865/ridep66.5.02openalex-snapshot
Prácticas Cuestionables en Estudios de Validez de Instrumentos de Medición Psicológica: Comunalidades y Unicidades de la Crisis de Replicabilidad en el Campo de la Psicometría
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24016/2020.v6n3.172openalex-snapshot
Replicability in psychological research: a reflection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24602/sjpr.62.3_281openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices following pre-registration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26481/dis.20200622bvopenalex-snapshot
The Effect of Embedded Lies on the Verbal Quality of Statements and Implications for Credibility Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x211001356openalex-snapshot
Both Questionable and Open Research Practices Are Prevalent in Education Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3102/1679938openalex-snapshot
Preregistration and Transparency in the Research Process
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7dc6aopenalex-snapshot
Quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in peer review and education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cwyk8openalex-snapshot
Assessing QRPs and RRPs in Psychology Masters’ Theses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/u3a6ropenalex-snapshot
Estudios de Replicación, Pre-registros y Ciencia Abierta en Psicología
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/vgbw2openalex-snapshot
Ethical review board-approved protocols and intent to use open practices in research on human subjects in Sweden
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/8ya3mopenalex-snapshot
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: Five years later
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/bn8vdopenalex-snapshot
Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/e6whpopenalex-snapshot
Stage 1 Registered Report: The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: five years later
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/r6cvxopenalex-snapshot
The replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s4b65openalex-snapshot
Replication success under questionable research practices – a simulation study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3v7hxopenalex-snapshot
Better Understanding the Population Size and Stigmatization of Psychologists Using Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/43yaeopenalex-snapshot
Preprint - Meta-Analyzing the Multiverse: A Peek Under the Hood of Selective Reporting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/48quxopenalex-snapshot
Making research evaluation more transparent: Aligning research philosophy, institutional values, and reporting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cj3xqopenalex-snapshot
Inflated false-positive risk in common regression analyses: A combinatorial analysis of model sets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dqap7openalex-snapshot
The Benefits of Preregistration and Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fuzkhopenalex-snapshot
Verify Original Results through Reanalysis before Replicating: A Commentary on “Making Replication Mainstream” by Rolf A. Zwaan, Alexander Etz, Richard E. Lucas, & M. Brent Donnellan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/g8cjqopenalex-snapshot
Doctoral thesis: The human fallibility of scientists - dealing with error and bias in academic research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hcfdropenalex-snapshot
What Do Participants Think of Our Research Practices? An Examination of Behavioral Psychology Participants’ Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ja4u2openalex-snapshot
Researchers’ Perceptions of the State of Social and Personality Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qtk7eopenalex-snapshot
Research on Research: A Meta-Scientific Study of Problems and Solutions in Psychological Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/qxa4nopenalex-snapshot
Understanding and shaping complex social psychological systems: Lessons from an emerging paradigm to thrive in an uncertain world
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/txnpgopenalex-snapshot
Exploration of suboptimal modeling choices - Ordinal modeling as a way to better understand effect size heterogeneity?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/bwm7sopenalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices and Open Science in Quantitative Criminology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/w63h7openalex-snapshot
Dealing with the replication crisis in psychological science: The contribution of Type M and Type S errors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31237/osf.io/y94guopenalex-snapshot
The comparison of two independent proportions via Design Analysis: Theoretical background and an R implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31577/sp.2023.01.866openalex-snapshot
Statistical Misconceptions, Awareness, and Attitudes towards Open Science Practices in Slovak Psychology Researchers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9411openalex-snapshot
Evading open science: The black box of student data collection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00996openalex-snapshot
Perceived Statistical Knowledge Level and Self-Reported Statistical Practice Among Academic Psychologists
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.654336openalex-snapshot
Is the Psychopathic Brain an Artifact of Coding Bias? A Systematic Review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860740openalex-snapshot
What is critical metascience and why is it important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani7120090openalex-snapshot
The Weak Spots in Contemporary Science (and How to Fix Them)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010110openalex-snapshot
Assessing Questionable and Responsible Research Practices in Psychology Master’s Theses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8040036openalex-snapshot
Effect Sizes, Power, and Biases in Intelligence Research: A Meta-Meta-Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01993-3openalex-snapshot
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices: Five years later
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02132-2openalex-snapshot
Correcting for outcome reporting bias in a meta-analysis: A meta-regression approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280290-2openalex-snapshot
Trust in numbers 1
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.47040/sd/sdpsych.v12i1.119openalex-snapshot
p-Hacking as a Questionable Research Practice in Industrial and Organizational Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/pb.1318openalex-snapshot
A Systematic Review on the Evolution of Power Analysis Practices in Psychological Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v7ns1.14178openalex-snapshot
frequency of questionable research practices in the domain of medical writing among the various health professionals of Pakistan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.54392/ajir25412openalex-snapshot
A Bibliometric and Scoping Review of Research Integrity among Research Scholars
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5507/tk.2023.002openalex-snapshot
The replication crisis in science and its overlap into kinantropology: an introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.55414/ap.v36i1-2.713openalex-snapshot
Estudios de replicación, pre-registros y ciencia abierta en Psicología
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/bhtkz-ypb51openalex-snapshot
What is Critical Metascience and Why is it Important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.45261openalex-snapshot
Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.45261.002openalex-snapshot
Decision letter: Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.45261.003openalex-snapshot
Author response: Four erroneous beliefs thwarting more trustworthy research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7554/elife.66388openalex-snapshot
Lessons from a catalogue of 6674 brain recordings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.21360openalex-snapshot
Study preregistration: an early example and analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8014openalex-snapshot
No relationship between researcher impact and replication effect: an analysis of five studies with 100 replications
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.