On the public citation graph

BENCHMARKING: A Tool for School Continuous Improvement

0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.

Claim with ORCID

Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.

See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-232x.2000.00158.xopenalex-snapshot

Benchmarking contractor selection practices in public-sector construction-a proposed model

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/00251749810223646openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking: a general reading for management practitioners

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/02656719710170738openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking field services using a zero defects approach

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529910288109openalex-snapshot

A historical perspective on fad adoption and abandonment

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770010322324openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking in the UK: an empirical study of practitioners and academics

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770210428992openalex-snapshot

The theory and practice of benchmarking: then and now

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770210429009openalex-snapshot

What to benchmark?

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770310495500openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking in the purchasing function and its impact on purchasing and business performance

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770410557708openalex-snapshot

A critique of benchmarking and performance measurement

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510582907openalex-snapshot

A typology of “best practices” for a benchmarking process

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770510609042openalex-snapshot

A business model for uncertainty management

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770710730964openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking the performance of English universities

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635770810876593openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking the benchmarking models

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/14635779910289261openalex-snapshot

Benchmarking – best practices: an integrated approach

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710823615openalex-snapshot

Reconceptualising benchmarking development in UK organisations: the effects of size and sector

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00669.xopenalex-snapshot

BENCHMARKING IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR: A CRITICAL CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5171/2011.357694openalex-snapshot

A Survey of Benchmarking Practices in Higher Education in Kenya: The Case of Public Universities

Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.