On the public citation graph

The Effectiveness and Potential Risks of Using Careless Responding Indices to Improve Data Quality

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5340451
0 signed · 59 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753openalex-snapshot
Data Collection in a Flat World: The Strengths and Weaknesses of Mechanical Turk Samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962openalex-snapshot
Best practice recommendations for data screening
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9458-2openalex-snapshot
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9231-8openalex-snapshot
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9357-6openalex-snapshot
Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9479-0openalex-snapshot
Intra-individual Response Variability as an Indicator of Insufficient Effort Responding: Comparison to Other Indicators and Relationships with Individual Differences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9514-9openalex-snapshot
Dirty Data: The Effects of Screening Respondents Who Provide Low-Quality Data in Survey Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-017-1767-2openalex-snapshot
Careless responding in internet-based quality of life assessments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0164-zopenalex-snapshot
Cross-Cultural Difference in Subjective Wellbeing: Cultural Response Bias as an Explanation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012134645-4/50031-7openalex-snapshot
Agreeableness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.032openalex-snapshot
Careless response and attrition as sources of bias in online survey assessments of personality traits and performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.007openalex-snapshot
The attentive and the careless: Examining the relationship between benevolent and malevolent personality traits with careless responding in online surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2008.05.015openalex-snapshot
Subtypes of depression in a nationally representative sample
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009openalex-snapshot
Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006openalex-snapshot
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2018.12.002openalex-snapshot
Response invalidity in empirical research: Causes, detection, and remedies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.009openalex-snapshot
Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.003openalex-snapshot
The 24-item Brief HEXACO Inventory (BHI)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008openalex-snapshot
Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.04.010openalex-snapshot
Detecting careless respondents in web-based questionnaires: Which method to use?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103849openalex-snapshot
I’m paid biweekly, just not by leprechauns: Evaluating valid-but-incorrect response rates to attention check items
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384openalex-snapshot
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.10.027openalex-snapshot
The IPIP–HEXACO scales: An alternative, public-domain measure of the personality constructs in the HEXACO model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.08.021openalex-snapshot
The inter-item standard deviation (ISD): An index that discriminates between conscientious and random responders
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.02.005openalex-snapshot
Personality and value correlates of careless and erratic questionnaire responses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.043openalex-snapshot
Factors associated with inattentive responding in online survey research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2017.11.005openalex-snapshot
Comparing and validating measures of non-cognitive traits: Performance task measures and self-reports from a nationally representative internet panel
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.3.340openalex-snapshot
MMPI-2 random responding indices: Validation using a self-report methodology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019216openalex-snapshot
Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085openalex-snapshot
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038510openalex-snapshot
Insufficient effort responding: Examining an insidious confound in survey data.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000924openalex-snapshot
Careless responding in online studies is associated with alcohol use: A mega-analysis.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000546openalex-snapshot
Careless responding in crowdsourced alcohol research: A systematic review and meta-analysis of practices and prevalence.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085openalex-snapshot
Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1507378openalex-snapshot
The impact of respondent attentiveness on reliability and validity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2018.1563966openalex-snapshot
How serious is the ‘carelessness’ problem on Mechanical Turk?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp031openalex-snapshot
Effects of Questionnaire Length on Participation and Indicators of Response Quality in a Web Survey
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12058openalex-snapshot
Insufficient Effort Survey Responding: An Under‐Appreciated Problem in Work and Organisational Health Psychology Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12118openalex-snapshot
Applying Social Psychology to Prevent Careless Responding during Online Surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12121openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Insufficient Effort Responding Detection Methods on Substantive Responses: Results from an Experiment Testing Parameter Invariance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12159openalex-snapshot
Social Interaction and Internet‐Based Surveys: Examining the Effects of Virtual and In‐Person Proctors on Careless Response
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2011.00529.xopenalex-snapshot
Proctored Versus Unproctored Internet Tests: Are unproctored noncognitive tests as predictive of job performance?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.xopenalex-snapshot
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410366686openalex-snapshot
Random Responding as a Threat to the Validity of Effect Size Estimates in Correlational Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022103260380openalex-snapshot
Acquiescent Response Bias as an Aspect of Cultural Communication Style
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119827379openalex-snapshot
Cultural Differences in Careless Responding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116641507openalex-snapshot
Identifying Careless Responding With the Psychopathic Personality Inventory–Revised Validity Scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211008245openalex-snapshot
The Big Five Inventory–2 in China: A Comprehensive Psychometric Evaluation in Four Diverse Samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493120openalex-snapshot
Random and Systematic Error Effects of Insomnia on Survey Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115571894openalex-snapshot
How Careless Responding and Acquiescence Response Bias Can Influence Construct Dimensionality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118799486openalex-snapshot
Insufficient Effort Responding as a Partial Function of Implicit Aggression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120947794openalex-snapshot
Will the Questions Ever End? Person-Level Increases in Careless Responding During Questionnaire Completion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617703168openalex-snapshot
Response Speed and Response Consistency as Mutually Validating Indicators of Data Quality in Online Samples
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2075704openalex-snapshot
Scale Development: Theory and Applications.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2501/jar-54-1-017-031openalex-snapshot
Fast and Furious … … or Much Ado About Nothing?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01258openalex-snapshot
Careless Responding Threatens Factorial Analytic Results and Construct Validity of Personality Measure
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.784375openalex-snapshot
The Relationship of Insufficient Effort Responding and Response Styles: An Online Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00185openalex-snapshot
Psychometric Properties of the Chinese version of UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01401-8openalex-snapshot
A little garbage in, lots of garbage out: Assessing the impact of careless responding in personality survey data
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.