On the public citation graph
Lower Court Dissent and Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia
0 signed · 36 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40805-7_4openalex-snapshot
Political Institutions and Policy in Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00989987openalex-snapshot
On the reputation of state supreme courts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2023.23openalex-snapshot
Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2024.5openalex-snapshot
Setting the Supreme Court’s Policy Agenda
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2026.10020openalex-snapshot
Lower Court Disagreements as Cues for Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381609090884openalex-snapshot
Agenda Setting in the Supreme Court: The Collision of Policy and Jurisprudence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2010.499160openalex-snapshot
The Prestige of Australian State Supreme Courts Over the 20th Century
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2021.1998346openalex-snapshot
Personal or political patronage? Judicial appointments and justice loyalty in the High Court of Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10854661.2009.10854661openalex-snapshot
Citing Outside the Law Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/703407openalex-snapshot
Judicial Choice among Cases for Certiorari
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/716187openalex-snapshot
Judicial Ideology in the Absence of Rights
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/730741openalex-snapshot
The “Odd Party Out” Theory of Certiorari
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.14.3655307openalex-snapshot
Speaking up: A Model of Judicial Dissent and Discretionary Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/scer.3.1147064openalex-snapshot
What Do Judges and Justices Maximize? (The Same Thing Everybody Else Does)
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avad038openalex-snapshot
Comparative Exceptionalism? Strategy and Ideology in the High Court of Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuv001openalex-snapshot
More than Just a Different Face? Judicial Diversity and Decision-making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/3.1.101openalex-snapshot
Why (And When) Judges Dissent: A Theoretical And Empirical Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/15.3.549openalex-snapshot
Sophisticated voting and gate-keeping in the supreme court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192898579.013.39openalex-snapshot
Public Opinion and Legitimacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00054.xopenalex-snapshot
Appellate Court Adherence to Precedent
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2008.00129.xopenalex-snapshot
Case Selection and the Study of Judicial Politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12002openalex-snapshot
Is Certiorari Contingent on Litigant Behavior? Petitioners' Role in Strategic Auditing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0067205x20906031openalex-snapshot
Open Justice, Efficient Justice and the Rule of Law: The Increasing Invisibility of Special Leave to Appeal Applications in the High Court of Australia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1961752openalex-snapshot
Organized Interests and Agenda Setting in the U.S. Supreme Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1962405openalex-snapshot
Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1963851openalex-snapshot
The Dynamics of Political Control of the Bureaucracy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2110445openalex-snapshot
Policy Goals in Judicial Gatekeeping: A Proximity Model of Discretionary Jurisdiction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2130135openalex-snapshot
Conflict with Supreme Court Precedent and the Granting of Plenary Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2130555openalex-snapshot
The Cue Theory of Supreme Court Certiorari Jurisdiction: A Reconsideration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2586383openalex-snapshot
Strategic Auditing in a Political Hierarchy: An Informational Model of the Supreme Court's Certiorari Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2960195openalex-snapshot
Supreme Court Justices as Strategic Decision Makers: Aggressive Grants and Defensive Denials on the Vinson Court
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3052953openalex-snapshot
The Decision to Grant or Deny Certiorari: Further Consideration of Cue Theory
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.