On the public citation graph

Defence and extension in knowledge construction: A comparative study of rhetorical functions of metadiscursive nouns in conclusion sections of academic writing

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5574460
0 signed · 26 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.11.002openalex-snapshot
Rhetorical strategies in engineering research articles and research theses: Advanced academic literacy and relations of power
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2008.02.002openalex-snapshot
Shell nouns as cohesive devices in published and ESL student writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.004openalex-snapshot
Expressing an evaluative stance in English and Malay research article conclusions: International publications versus local publications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006openalex-snapshot
Metadiscourse in the introductions of PhD theses and research articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.01.007openalex-snapshot
The introductory it pattern: Variability explored in learner and expert writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.01.005openalex-snapshot
Generality in student and expert epistemic stance: A corpus analysis of first-year, upper-level, and published academic writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.02.004openalex-snapshot
Nominal stance construction in IELTS tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.09.005openalex-snapshot
Why are abstracts in PhD theses and research articles different? A genre-specific perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101179openalex-snapshot
A phraseological study of highlighting strategies in novice and expert writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101344openalex-snapshot
Promotional strategies in English and Chinese research article introduction and discussion/conclusion sections: A cross-cultural study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.02.001openalex-snapshot
Disciplinary interactions: metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2019.102758openalex-snapshot
“There are significant differences…”: The secret life of existential there in academic writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1475-1585(02)00003-6openalex-snapshot
Literacy and disciplinary practices: opening and closing perspectives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511981395openalex-snapshot
Corpus Linguistics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.22.1.04jiaopenalex-snapshot
Stance and voice in academic writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079412331382007openalex-snapshot
The significance of disciplinary differences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.3.371openalex-snapshot
If you look at ...: Lexical Bundles in University Teaching and Textbooks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac040openalex-snapshot
Move–Bundle Connection in Conclusion Sections of Research Articles Across Disciplines
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.1994.tb00065.xopenalex-snapshot
Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: a study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2008.00178.xopenalex-snapshot
Academic clusters: text patterning in published and postgraduate writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445615590719openalex-snapshot
‘The fact that’: Stance nouns in disciplinary writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110808704openalex-snapshot
English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2023-0062openalex-snapshot
English research articles versus MA theses in applied linguistics: comparing the move structure and metadiscourse features in the results and discussion sections
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105553openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Sustainable Growth of EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Differences between Novice and Expert Writers in Their Use of Lexical Bundles in Academic Writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.52567/pjsr.v3i4.318openalex-snapshot
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS AND ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY RESEARCH ARTICLES: VERB TENSE IN CONCLUSION SECTION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.1.p.46openalex-snapshot
An Investigation of Metadiscourse Features in Applied Linguistics Academic Research Articles and Master’s Dissertations
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.