On the public citation graph

Rethinking Writing Development in Management Education: Feedback, AI, and the Limits of Holistic Assessment

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7070974
0 signed · 13 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100704openalex-snapshot
Grammarly: An instructional intervention for writing enhancement in management education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254openalex-snapshot
The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896openalex-snapshot
The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211060776openalex-snapshot
Peer assessment in EFL teacher preparation: A longitudinal study of student perception
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00201-9openalex-snapshot
The effects of automatic writing evaluation and teacher-focused feedback on CALF measures and overall quality of L2 writing across different genres
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2020.11.03.01openalex-snapshot
Linguistic features in writing quality and development: An overview
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing Performance and Learning of Secondary School Students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487openalex-snapshot
The Power of Feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795openalex-snapshot
Focus on Formative Feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3200/joeb.81.6.322-326openalex-snapshot
Using Peer Review to Improve Student Writing in Business Courses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.45.05openalex-snapshot
A Systematic Review of Automated Writing Evaluation Feedback: Validity, Effects and Students’ Engagement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2023.1162454openalex-snapshot
Automated feedback and writing: a multi-level meta-analysis of effects on students' performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.37514/jwa-j.2022.6.1.04openalex-snapshot
Linguistic Features of Writing Quality and Development: A Longitudinal Approach
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.