On the public citation graph

The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing Performance and Learning of Secondary School Students

https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266
0 signed · 182 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.525openalex-snapshot
The Reliability and Validity of Peer Review of Writing in High School AP English Classes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.149openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Giving Feedback on the Persuasive Writing of Fourth- and Fifth-Grade Students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-017-0348-7openalex-snapshot
Leveraging the potential of peer feedback in an academic writing activity through sense-making support
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9287-xopenalex-snapshot
The Effect of Small Sample Size on Two-Level Model Estimates: A Review and Illustration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-011-9628-8openalex-snapshot
Relationship of School Context to Rural Youth’s Educational Achievement and Aspirations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9053-xopenalex-snapshot
The nature of feedback: how different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1openalex-snapshot
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2openalex-snapshot
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-017-9420-6openalex-snapshot
Charting the routes to revision: An interplay of writing goals, peer comments, and self-reflections from peer reviews
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-010-9081-5openalex-snapshot
Graduate students’ self-reported perspectives regarding peer feedback and feedback from writing consultants
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.02.004openalex-snapshot
Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline: A web-based reciprocal peer review system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004openalex-snapshot
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002openalex-snapshot
To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer's own writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006openalex-snapshot
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008openalex-snapshot
Peer feedback content and sender's competence level in academic writing revision tasks: Are they critical for feedback perceptions and efficiency?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.009openalex-snapshot
The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.002openalex-snapshot
Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005openalex-snapshot
Training effects on computer-mediated peer review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00040-1openalex-snapshot
Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: effects on learning and transfer
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9openalex-snapshot
Do Secondary L2 Writers Benefit from Peer Comments?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9openalex-snapshot
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811852openalex-snapshot
Negative Binomial Regression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511811852.007openalex-snapshot
Negative binomial regression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511816796.038openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.119.2.254openalex-snapshot
Effects of feedback intervention on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295x.89.4.369openalex-snapshot
Acquisition of cognitive skill.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445openalex-snapshot
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363openalex-snapshot
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.89.4.369openalex-snapshot
Acquisition of cognitive skill.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.7.4.422openalex-snapshot
Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013097openalex-snapshot
Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950openalex-snapshot
Learning by reviewing.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000103openalex-snapshot
The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.xopenalex-snapshot
Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175openalex-snapshot
The Analysis of Count Data: A Gentle Introduction to Poisson Regression and Its Alternatives
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569openalex-snapshot
Peer Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903213600openalex-snapshot
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478722openalex-snapshot
A Test of Missing Completely at Random for Multivariate Data with Missing Values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.795518openalex-snapshot
Rethinking feedback practices in higher education: a peer review perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318openalex-snapshot
Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090openalex-snapshot
Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1320374openalex-snapshot
Accountability in peer assessment: examining the effects of reviewing grades on peer ratings and peer feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649509526885openalex-snapshot
Constructivism and computer‐mediated communication in distance education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560600837578openalex-snapshot
Influencing Children's Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation of Reading and Writing Through Modeling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/713695728openalex-snapshot
Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccu036openalex-snapshot
Learning from giving feedback: a study of secondary-level students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.xopenalex-snapshot
Required Sample Size to Detect the Mediated Effect
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00674.xopenalex-snapshot
Evidence on the Effectiveness of Comprehensive Error Correction in Second Language Writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12096openalex-snapshot
Structuring the peer assessment process: a multilevel approach for the impact on product improvement and peer feedback quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085530openalex-snapshot
Missing Data Analysis: Making It Work in the Real World
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124118799372openalex-snapshot
Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology: Exploring Variation in Coder Decision-Making
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587618openalex-snapshot
Rubric Use in Formative Assessment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848openalex-snapshot
Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114549601openalex-snapshot
Count-Based Research in Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1101_1openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1openalex-snapshot
Social origins of self-regulatory competence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1493598600openalex-snapshot
A comparison of different methods of zero-inflated data analysis and an application in health surveys
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2348998openalex-snapshot
Regression Diagnostics: An Introduction.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2943781openalex-snapshot
What Matters in College? Four Critical Years Revisited.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487openalex-snapshot
The Power of Feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795openalex-snapshot
Focus on Formative Feedback
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985604openalex-snapshot
Regression Diagnostics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.58680/ej201116413openalex-snapshot
EJ Extra: A Snapshot of Writing Instruction in Middle Schools and High Schools [FREE ACCESS]
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.58680/rte199315397openalex-snapshot
Feedback and Revision in Writing across the Curriculum Classes

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5115438openalex-extracted
Ai Generated vs. Peer Feedback in Esl Writing:Effects on Writing Skill, Self-Efficacy, And Enjoyment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.70161openalex-snapshot
Mastering OSCE Competencies Through Peer Role‐Play and Bidirectional Feedback: Empowering Self‐Assessment and Documentation in LA Emergencies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7353-8_19openalex-snapshot
Student Perception of Peer Review in the Digital Age
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-026-01148-4openalex-snapshot
Assessor versus assessee: a scoping review of the impact of peer assessment roles on cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal outcomes
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13032-zopenalex-snapshot
The impact of different peer feedback types on student academic writing performance from dyadic and individual analyses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09939-8openalex-snapshot
Does Learning from Giving Feedback Depend on the Product Being Reviewed: Concept Maps or Answers to Test Questions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-021-09389-4openalex-snapshot
Giving feedback on peers’ concept maps as a learning experience: does quality of reviewed concept maps matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-025-09527-2openalex-snapshot
Visual peer feedback using a digital space: a study of sixth-grade students in the visual arts classroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5openalex-snapshot
From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09640-wopenalex-snapshot
When do students provide more peer feedback? The roles of performance and prior feedback experiences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09401-4openalex-snapshot
Does matching peers at finer-grained levels of prior performance enhance gains in task performance from peer review?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00850-0openalex-snapshot
Exploring an Innovative Approach to Enhance Discussion Board Engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00749-7openalex-snapshot
The Effects of Writing Revisions on Writing Improvement Among Undergraduate Students: The Moderating Role of Self-rating Accuracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104825openalex-snapshot
What kind of matching groups makes students benefit more? The role of reviewer expertise and document quality within-groups
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106612openalex-snapshot
Investigating instructor-guided peer assessment: A quasi-experiment on writing attitudes among undergraduate EFL learners
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100864openalex-snapshot
EvaluMate: Using AI to support students’ feedback provision in peer assessment for writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2024.100889openalex-snapshot
Effects of writing feedback literacies on feedback engagement and writing performance: A cross-linguistic perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160openalex-snapshot
Passive, active, and constructive engagement with peer feedback: A revised model of learning from peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210openalex-snapshot
Self-regulation of peer feedback quality aspects through different dimensions of experience within prior peer feedback assignments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2025.102397openalex-snapshot
Overwhelmed receivers and overly ambitious providers: How the Impacts of peer comment features look different at receiver and provider levels of aggregation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2026.102491openalex-snapshot
Accept, elaborate, modify, or no uptake?: Which peer feedback features matter?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106924openalex-snapshot
What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students’ task performance?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857openalex-snapshot
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104319openalex-snapshot
Backward evaluation in peer assessment: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105104openalex-snapshot
The moderating effects of total comments on the relationship between comment implementation and online peer-supported writing performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105675openalex-snapshot
What task to offload to GenAI in the writing feedback process? – Effects of task-offloading approaches on EFL learners’ writing skill development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2026.100848openalex-snapshot
Peer feedback quality matters for post-feedback outcomes: A meta-analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2024.100962openalex-snapshot
Effects of an AI-supported approach to peer feedback on university EFL students' feedback quality and writing ability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.101040openalex-snapshot
What they provide and how: An intervention study on pre-service teachers' GenAI-assisted writing feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101255openalex-snapshot
EFL student engagement with giving peer feedback in academic writing: A longitudinal study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2026.101014openalex-snapshot
The anonymity paradox: Navigating face-saving and credibility in Chinese EFL peer feedback practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102253openalex-snapshot
Effects of peer feedback and self-assessment on writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102428openalex-snapshot
Understanding peer feedback uptake: The role of perceived peer feedback literacy and situational factors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102489openalex-snapshot
From revision to learning transfer: Self- and socially shared-regulated pathways in AI-assisted feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.115openalex-snapshot
The Construction and Application of an Automatic Scoring System for English Writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101286openalex-snapshot
Optimizing student writing performance in higher education: A quantitative study of teacher feedback and classroom environment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101351openalex-snapshot
How constructive is that feedback? Associations with undergraduates’ future time perspectives moderated by student characteristics’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101411openalex-snapshot
Interconnecting peer feedback literacy: Exploring the relationship between providing and acting on peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101422openalex-snapshot
The effects of peer feedback provision and reception on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ writing development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101560openalex-snapshot
Provider versus recipient: Peer feedback roles effect on task performance, perceptions of learning, trust, and epistemic emotions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101566openalex-snapshot
Academic ability generates better quality feedback: Evidence from PeerWise assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2026.101642openalex-snapshot
What have researchers examined? Capturing the conceptual diversity of peer feedback quality measures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2026.105619openalex-snapshot
Examining the role of peer engagement and anonymity in studio-based learning: Impacts on feedback quality, utility, and technological self-efficacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100950openalex-snapshot
Online peer assessment improves learners’ creativity:not only learners’ roles as an assessor or assessee, but also their behavioral sequence matter
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1039/d5rp00118hopenalex-snapshot
“It makes me feel better… just because they said I had a solid argument:” characterization of student interaction with peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2026.2710208openalex-snapshot
Lighting the spark: How LLMs empower underprivileged Chinese high school students to reimagine EFL writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2025.2466146openalex-snapshot
Effect of Peer Feedback Role: Task Performance, Feedback Implementation and Perceptions on Learning and Trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179openalex-snapshot
Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1968792openalex-snapshot
What makes students contribute more peer feedback? The role of within-course experience with peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2278017openalex-snapshot
Feedback, feedback-on-feedback and re-feedback: effects of written dialogic peer feedback on English as a foreign language writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2301722openalex-snapshot
Can ChatGPT effectively complement teacher assessment of undergraduate students’ academic writing?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2025.2555322openalex-snapshot
Can a minimalistic tip sheet with a motivational focus foster high-quality, motivating peer-feedback? Results of two field experiments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2023.2233573openalex-snapshot
Peer editing using shared online documents: the effects of comments and track changes on student L2 academic writing quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2164785openalex-snapshot
Digital peer feedback on visual ideas: a study of eighth-grade students in visual art
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2025.2546814openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Teacher Feedback on Improving 6th-Grade Students’ L1 Writing Performance and Motivation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2021.1952726openalex-snapshot
Why students want to provide feedback to their peers: Drivers of feedback quantity and variation by type of course
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2025.2552699openalex-snapshot
Exploring work-based learning feedback experiences among students with learning difficulties in Vocational Education and Training in Finland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2024.2402361openalex-snapshot
How does peer feedback impact academic performance? An empirical investigation in an undergraduate business context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/cste69562.2026.11649771openalex-snapshot
AI-Generated vs. Peer Feedback in EFL Writing: Effects on Writing Skills, Self-Efficacy, and Enjoyment by Proficiency Levels
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ithet56107.2022.10031747openalex-snapshot
A Review of Empirical Studies on Peerceptiv
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/itt56123.2022.9863971openalex-snapshot
Student Performance Prediction in Secondary School Education Using Machine Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12861openalex-snapshot
What predicts variation in reliability and validity of online peer assessment? A large‐scale cross‐context study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3578837.3578858openalex-snapshot
Impact of Online Peer Assessment on Reflective Writing Performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1271802openalex-snapshot
Enhancing the Quality of Research Synopsis of International Students Through Peer Feedback: A Case Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231184270openalex-snapshot
Pre-Writing and Post-Writing Explicit Instruction: Differential Effects on L2 Learners’ Writing Accuracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00986283251377657openalex-snapshot
The Effect of Including Computerized Revision Extent Scores in Grading on Writing Revisions in Psychology Courses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/07410883241263542openalex-snapshot
Student Experiences With Peer Review and Revision for Writing-to-Learn in a Chemistry Course Context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/14697874251389104openalex-snapshot
Comment Type Matters: Analysing the Implementation of Summary, Problem/Solution, and Praise Comments in Peer Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251412256openalex-snapshot
How to Conduct a Classic Grounded Theory in 12 Months: A Practical Guide for PhD Students
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/20965311251346498openalex-snapshot
Can Rating Be More Than a Warm-Up Activity in Classroom Assessments? Exploring the Role of Rating in Peer and Self-Assessments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251355772openalex-snapshot
Exploring Learners’ Perceptions and Internal Mechanisms in Digital Peer Feedback: A Meta-Synthesis of EFL/ESL Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8openalex-snapshot
Online peer editing: the influence of comments, tracked changes and perception of participation on students’ writing performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00458-1openalex-snapshot
What does it mean to be good at peer reviewing? A multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis study of behavioral indicators of peer feedback literacy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00502-8openalex-snapshot
The good, bad, and ugly of comment prompts: Effects on length and helpfulness of peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00522-4openalex-snapshot
Promoting formative self-assessment through peer assessment: peer work quality matters for writing performance and internal feedback generation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00558-6openalex-snapshot
The value of GenAI for peer feedback provision: student perceptions and impacts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.12677/ae.2024.146962openalex-snapshot
Impact of Providing Peer Feedback—An Empirical Study on Web-Based Peer Review in English Writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15294/elt.v10i3.46040openalex-snapshot
EFL students’ voices on digital peer feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15366/riee2024.17.2.003openalex-snapshot
La Retroalimentación por Pares a través del Diálogo Vista por el Alumnado
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18542/amazrecm.v18i41.13550openalex-snapshot
Potencialidades da metodologia ativa revisão por pares na formação inicial docente
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.7070974openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Writing Development in Management Education: Feedback, AI, and the Limits of Holistic Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v15n1.09openalex-snapshot
The Effectiveness of and Students’ Perceptions of Peer Feedback: A Vietnam Action Research Project
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2025.47.61776openalex-snapshot
La evaluación entre iguales de textos académicos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22318/cscl2025.630222openalex-snapshot
Comparing AI Feedback and Teacher Feedback on Argumentative Writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22318/icls2025.160205openalex-snapshot
GenAI as a Peer Review Support: Impact on Feedback Quality, Quantity, and Student Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.22318/icls2025.384467openalex-snapshot
Feedback Sources in Argumentative Writing: AI Feedback or Peer Feedback?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26907/esd.18.1.03openalex-snapshot
Investigating the Effect of Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Peer Feedback on IELTS Candidates’ Writing Development and Interactions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.28945/5609openalex-snapshot
Unpacking the Impact of Writing Task Complexity, Use of Digital Tools, and Engagement Strategies on University Students’ Academic Writing Performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.30656/jpmwp.v8i1.7249openalex-snapshot
Penguatan Kompetensi Computational Thinking dalam Pembelajaran IPA Melalui Perancangan Pembelajaran Argumentasi Konstruktivis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.33394/jo-elt.v11i2.13330openalex-snapshot
Peer Feedback in Academic Writing: Students' Perspectives on Learning and Improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1860972openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence or the teacher? The effect of ChatGPT and teacher feedback on writing achievement in foreign language instruction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.739962openalex-snapshot
Understanding the Difference Between Self-Feedback and Peer Feedback: A Comparative Study of Their Effects on Undergraduate Students' Writing Improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35192/jjoas-n.v16i1.1839openalex-snapshot
Perspectives from nurse educators regarding the nursing courses of the secondary technical nursing schools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.35192/jjoas-n.v16i2.1839openalex-snapshot
Perspectives from nurse educators regarding the nursing courses of the secondary technical nursing schools
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v8i1.177openalex-snapshot
THE INFLUENCES OF PEER FEEDBACK IN IMPROVING EFL LEARNERS’ WRITING PERFORMANCES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.37514/atd-j.2025.22.1-2.02openalex-snapshot
Writing Circles in STEM: Why structured peer review engages students as writers, thinkers, and collaborators in their discipline
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/25jul299openalex-snapshot
English Teachers’ Experiences with Artificial Intelligence-Driven Students’ Outputs in the Classroom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036551175openalex-snapshot
Giving feedback to peers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4018/ijcallt.364847openalex-snapshot
Investigating the Accuracy of ChatGPT as a Writing Error Correction Tool
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.460openalex-snapshot
Students’ Argumentation Performance in Online Learning Environments: Bridging Culture and Gender
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46451/ijclt.20240308openalex-snapshot
网络环境下汉语学习者合作写作效果研究
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v9i3.5095openalex-snapshot
FEEDBACK METHODS IN VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING FOR SUPPORTING STUDENTS WITH LEARNING DISABILITIES AND/ DIFFICULTIES IN LEARNING: A LITERATURE REVIEW
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.46963/asatiza.v7i1.3390openalex-snapshot
Implementing the PEEC technique through classroom action research: A strategy to mitigate adad–ma‘dūd errors in beginner-level Arabic writing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.51657/ric.v6i1.51446openalex-snapshot
Rétroaction par les pairs: quelles conditions pour un apport optimal aux apprentissages des étudiantes et étudiants?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.51867/ajernet.6.2.61openalex-snapshot
Effect of communication techniques on learners’ academic performance in selected nine years basic education schools, Rubavu District, Rwanda
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.52337/pjer.v6i2.847openalex-snapshot
TO ANALYZE THE IMPACT OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN FOSTERING THE STUDENT’S LEARNING COMPETENCIES
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53506/egitim.1643997openalex-snapshot
Yazma Eğitiminde Geri Bildirim: Kavramsal Bir Çerçeve
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.657openalex-snapshot
Behavioral Contract Techniques to Increase Social Sciences Learning Motivation in During Covid-19 Pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n4p215openalex-snapshot
Beyond the Red Pen: Exploring the Impact of Language Peer Assessment Technology on the ESL/EFL Writers’ Performance
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.57237/j.ssrf.2023.03.004openalex-snapshot
Using and Improving Automated Evaluation of Writing from Students’ Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5861/ijrse.2025.25003openalex-snapshot
Challenges and interventions in writing from the perspective of selected tertiary students: Basis for an enhanced and context-sensitive writing curriculum
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.58680/vm202231926openalex-snapshot
Insights: Critiquing the Critics: Learning to Discriminate Between Constructive and Nonconstructive Peer Feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.58837/chula.the.2021.384openalex-snapshot
Exploring and analysis of student engagement in English writing grammar accuracy based on teacher written corrective feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59343/yuyay.v1i2.14openalex-snapshot
Peer feedback and its impact in the writing process of International Baccalaureate students in a public institution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.61707/cse01s14openalex-snapshot
Technological Tools in the Assessment of Meaningful Student Learning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0311openalex-snapshot
Research Writing Competence of Grade 12 Students: Towards Research Culture Improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.330405openalex-snapshot
Navigating the Writing Maze: An Exploration of Technical -Vocational- Livelihood Students’ Writing Proficiency
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2024/v18i7690openalex-snapshot
Metacognitive Awareness of Writing Strategies, Oral Proficiency, and Writing Instructions: A Structural Equation Model of Academic Writing Skills in Filipino Language
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.