On the public citation graph

Cross-disciplinary Source Use in Academic Discourse: A Comparative Study of Research Articles Between Applied Linguistics and Oceanography

0 signed · 17 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.04.004openalex-snapshot
Visible and occluded citation features in postgraduate second-language writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.008openalex-snapshot
The development of source use by international postgraduate students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.09.001openalex-snapshot
Form and function of citations in discussion sections of master's theses and research articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.001openalex-snapshot
Disciplinary and ethnolinguistic influences on citation in research articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2015.05.003openalex-snapshot
Uncovering published authors' text-borrowing practices: Paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.02.003openalex-snapshot
Differences in engagement: A comparison of the strategies used by British and Chinese research article writers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.05.005openalex-snapshot
Reporting research in applied linguistics: The role of nativeness and expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007openalex-snapshot
Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.002openalex-snapshot
Adopting academic values: Student use of that-complement clauses in academic writing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/20.3.341openalex-snapshot
Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml021openalex-snapshot
The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses: A Cross-disciplinary Study of Theses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx012openalex-snapshot
Points of Reference: Changing Patterns of Academic Citation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088313515166openalex-snapshot
Variation in Citational Practice in a Corpus of Student Biology Papers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-2046openalex-snapshot
Evaluation in research article introductions: A comparison of the strategies used by Chinese and British authors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0512.08openalex-snapshot
Reporting Verbs in Applied Linguistics Research Articles by Native and Non-native Writers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029053openalex-snapshot
Research Methods in Education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149641openalex-snapshot
A cross-language study on citation practice in PhD theses
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.