On the public citation graph

ABA+: Assumption-based argumentation with preferences

https://doi.org/10.25560/58340
0 signed · 44 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48317-9_15openalex-snapshot
A System for Defeasible Argumentation, with Defeasible Priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13191-7_10openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation Equipped with Preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78197-4_36openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation for Closed and Consistent Defeasible Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9openalex-snapshot
Working with Preferences: Less Is More
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9_9openalex-snapshot
Decision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118494openalex-snapshot
Abstract argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-aopenalex-snapshot
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.02.003openalex-snapshot
On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.003openalex-snapshot
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2009.02.001openalex-snapshot
Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005openalex-snapshot
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008openalex-snapshot
A general account of argumentation with preferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2007.07.005openalex-snapshot
Preference-based argumentation: Arguments supporting multiple values
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2010.05.004openalex-snapshot
AFRA: Argumentation framework with recursive attacks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2013.10.010openalex-snapshot
Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00015-5openalex-snapshot
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00015-6openalex-snapshot
Preferred answer sets for extended logic programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014490210693openalex-snapshot
A Reasoning Model Based on the Production of Acceptable Arguments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869764openalex-snapshot
Introduction to structured argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869878openalex-snapshot
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429openalex-snapshot
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/ext049openalex-snapshot
Translating preferred subtheories into structured argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v24i1.7584openalex-snapshot
Representing Preferences Among Sets

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-020-09701-6openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Analytics for Treatment Deliberations in Multimorbidity Cases: An Introduction to Two Artificial Intelligence Approaches
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103449openalex-snapshot
Computational complexity of flat and generic Assumption-Based Argumentation, with and without probabilities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2023.103966openalex-snapshot
A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2020.02.011openalex-snapshot
Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2021.08.008openalex-snapshot
Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation part II: Reasoning with preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2024.109340openalex-snapshot
Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks with preferences: Partial orders and collective attacks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200151openalex-snapshot
Human-machine collaboration in intelligence analysis: An expert evaluation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.128openalex-snapshot
Enhancing Classification Interpretability with Argument-Based Explanations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068421000296openalex-snapshot
Harnessing Incremental Answer Set Solving for Reasoning in Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i7.16798openalex-snapshot
Ranking Sets of Defeasible Elements in Preferential Approaches to Structured Argumentation: Postulates, Relations, and Characterizations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.12479openalex-snapshot
Declarative Algorithms and Complexity Results for Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2021/6openalex-snapshot
Characterizations and Classifications of Argumentative Entailments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2022/22openalex-snapshot
Computing Stable Conclusions under the Weakest-Link Principle in the ASPIC+ Argumentation Formalism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/kr.2023/6openalex-snapshot
Simple Contrapositive Assumption-Based Argumentation with Partially-Ordered Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200528openalex-snapshot
Comparing logic programming and formal argumentation; the case of ideal and eager semantics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200901openalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games: 25 years later
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-200903openalex-snapshot
Rationality and maximal consistent sets for a fragment of ASPIC+ without undercut
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32657/10356/155849openalex-snapshot
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for healthcare decision-making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4114/intartif.vol20iss59pp40-81openalex-snapshot
Rational versus Intuitive Outcomes of Reasoning with Preferences: Argumentation Perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1809.04861openalex-snapshot
Relevance in Structured Argumentation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.