On the public citation graph
Abstract argumentation
0 signed · 115 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55930-2_15openalex-snapshot
Legislation as logic programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-59487-6_29openalex-snapshot
Computing the acceptability semantics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5668-4_6openalex-snapshot
A Dialectical Model of Assessing Conflicting Arguments in Legal Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8531-6_14openalex-snapshot
Legislation as Logic Programs
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00118496openalex-snapshot
A dialectical model of assessing conflicting arguments in legal reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4openalex-snapshot
A logic for default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(85)90042-6openalex-snapshot
Semantical considerations on nonmonotonic logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(97)00015-5openalex-snapshot
An abstract, argumentation-theoretic approach to default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198537472.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Autoepistemic Logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/112646.112665openalex-snapshot
The structure of norm conditions and nonmonotonic reasoning in law
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222096openalex-snapshot
On the relation between legal language and legal argument
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/222092.222098openalex-snapshot
Teleological reasoning in reason-based logic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.385.0openalex-snapshot
Proceedings 39th International Conference on Logic Programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.385.31openalex-snapshot
Proceedings 39th International Conference on Logic Programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.385.43openalex-snapshot
Proceedings 39th International Conference on Logic Programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/4301.003.0040openalex-snapshot
Logic Programming without Negation as Failure
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/int.20187openalex-snapshot
Recent advances in computational models of natural argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/10720076_2openalex-snapshot
Knowledge Representation Using High-Level Non-monotonic Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_32openalex-snapshot
Gradual Valuation for Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11750734_12openalex-snapshot
Variety of Behaviours Through Profiles in Logic-Based Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-36524-9_14openalex-snapshot
Connecting Databases with Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44533-1_7openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_14openalex-snapshot
The Role of Logic in Computational Models of Legal Argument: A Critical Survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_24openalex-snapshot
Simply the Best: A Case for Abduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45632-5_8openalex-snapshot
A Model Generation Based Theorem Prover MGTP for First-Order Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-46146-9_24openalex-snapshot
Establishment of Virtual Enterprise Contracts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-63614-5_32openalex-snapshot
Towards AI formalisms for legal evidence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_10openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_18openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in Legal Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07215-9_29openalex-snapshot
A Language Oriented Extension to Toulmin’s Argumentation Model for Conceptual Modelling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17130-2_24openalex-snapshot
Conflict Resolution in Assumption-Based Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_12openalex-snapshot
ArgP2P: An Argumentative Approach for Intelligent Query Routing in P2P Networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67162-8_30openalex-snapshot
Data Science Techniques for Law and Justice: Current State of Research and Open Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77434-3_18openalex-snapshot
Knowledge Representation for Philosophers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25928-2_21openalex-snapshot
A Dialectic Architecture for Computational Autonomy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-31794-4_18openalex-snapshot
The KGP Model of Agency for Global Computing: Computational Model and Prototype Implementation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78197-4_36openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation for Closed and Consistent Defeasible Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78915-4_7openalex-snapshot
Preferences and Assumption-Based Argumentation for Conflict-Free Normative Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85569-9_12openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation for Epistemic and Practical Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88833-8_13openalex-snapshot
Assumption-Based Argumentation for Selection and Composition of Services
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14309-0_5openalex-snapshot
Knowledge Representation and Non-monotonic Reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_32openalex-snapshot
Traceability of the Implementation of Legal Rules in Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16438-5_4openalex-snapshot
Knowledge Acquisition from Sources of Law in Public Administration
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16524-5_6openalex-snapshot
Traceability and Change in Legal Requirements Engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20832-4_11openalex-snapshot
Argumentation and Answer Set Programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29414-3_12openalex-snapshot
Open Texture and Argumentation: What Makes an Argument Persuasive?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32066-8_1openalex-snapshot
The Process of Reaching Agreement in Meaning Negotiation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33158-9_10openalex-snapshot
Reasoning on the Web with Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9010-5_7openalex-snapshot
Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0456-4_3openalex-snapshot
Logics for Defeasible Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1112-7openalex-snapshot
Activity qualifiers using an argument-based construction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-019-09632-yopenalex-snapshot
Digital forensics and investigations meet artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-008-9069-1openalex-snapshot
Formalising ordinary legal disputes: a case study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9131-xopenalex-snapshot
A history of AI and Law in 50 papers: 25 years of the international conference on AI and Law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9210-0openalex-snapshot
On the problem of making autonomous vehicles conform to traffic law
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-012-9324-4openalex-snapshot
Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2005.07.002openalex-snapshot
Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.003openalex-snapshot
Computing ideal sceptical argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.09.010openalex-snapshot
A generalised framework for dispute derivations in assumption-based argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2012.10.008openalex-snapshot
A general account of argumentation with preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2015.06.005openalex-snapshot
Law and logic: A review from an argumentation perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.datak.2005.09.005openalex-snapshot
Argument-based critics and recommenders: A qualitative perspective on user support systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2015.07.001openalex-snapshot
Value-based argumentation framework built from prioritized qualitative choice logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2013.08.004openalex-snapshot
A neural cognitive model of argumentation with application to legal inference and decision making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2004.07.007openalex-snapshot
Pre-argumentative reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(02)00245-xopenalex-snapshot
On the computational complexity of assumption-based argumentation for default reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(03)00107-3openalex-snapshot
Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888900002058openalex-snapshot
Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068401001168openalex-snapshot
Propositional defeasible logic has linear complexity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068401001247openalex-snapshot
On properties of update sequences based on causal rejection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068402001576openalex-snapshot
Using methods of declarative logic programming for intelligent information agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1471068403001674openalex-snapshot
Defeasible logic programming: an argumentative approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011288805074openalex-snapshot
Argument construction and reinstatement in logics for defeasible reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08839510490279852openalex-snapshot
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND FORMALISMS FOR LEGAL EVIDENCE: AN INTRODUCTION
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13600860050032970openalex-snapshot
Law, Learning, Technology: Reiving Ower the Borders
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2013.869878openalex-snapshot
A tutorial on assumption-based argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/14.5.675openalex-snapshot
Argumentation Semantics for Defeasible Logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/9.2.215openalex-snapshot
Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exi057openalex-snapshot
Value-based Argumentation Frameworks as Neural-symbolic Learning Systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/69.971190openalex-snapshot
Nonmonotonic reasoning as prioritized argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/dexa.1999.795282openalex-snapshot
Categorising justifications in legal argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icdmw.2018.00038openalex-snapshot
How to Determine the Necessary Knowledge in the Conflicting Situation?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1142/s021962200800282xopenalex-snapshot
DEFEASIBLE REASONING IN WEB-BASED FORMS THROUGH ARGUMENTATION
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261656openalex-snapshot
Some arguments about legal arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3017679openalex-snapshot
Using Argumentation to Improve Classification in Natural Language Problems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/323706.323715openalex-snapshot
Dialectic semantics for argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/371316.371517openalex-snapshot
Representation results for defeasible logic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1155/2014/725279openalex-snapshot
Quality of Protection Evaluation of Security Mechanisms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1527/tjsai.17.32openalex-snapshot
A Legal Negotiatiton Support System Based on A Diagram
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15439/2016f272openalex-snapshot
Modeling conflicts between legal rules
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2016.v39n2.caaopenalex-snapshot
Argumentos Máximamente Específicos en Argumentación Rebatible
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.2596openalex-snapshot
Computational Logic Foundations of KGP Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/v10209-011-0006-9openalex-snapshot
Conflicts in legal knowledge base
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.25560/58340openalex-snapshot
ABA+: Assumption-based argumentation with preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-003-2-iopenalex-snapshot
Legal Theory, Sources of Law and the Semantic Web
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-082-7-182openalex-snapshot
Dealing with Changes to Legislation in Networked Environments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4114/ia.v19i58.1129openalex-snapshot
Restablecimiento y especificidad en Sistemas Argumentativos
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1101.4356openalex-snapshot
Meaning Negotiation as Inference
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1301.7404openalex-snapshot
Resolving Conflicting Arguments under Uncertainties
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1804.06763openalex-snapshot
A General Account of Argumentation with Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.cs/0405090openalex-snapshot
Propositional Defeasible Logic has Linear Complexity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7916/d8-71fz-xg62openalex-snapshot
Content Selection for Effective Counter-Argument Generation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.