On the public citation graph
Assessing the Computational Thinking of Pre-Service Teachers: A Gender and Robotics Programming Experience Analysis
0 signed · 53 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10700-2openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review regarding computational thinking and programming in early childhood education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9355-xopenalex-snapshot
Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09587-2openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking Assessment – Towards More Vivid Interpretations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10227-5openalex-snapshot
Integrating Computational Thinking in STEM Education: A Literature Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9552-xopenalex-snapshot
Comparing Virtual and Physical Robotics Environments for Supporting Complex Systems and Computational Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-021-09305-yopenalex-snapshot
A scoping review of computational thinking assessments in higher education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00177-2openalex-snapshot
Assessing computational thinking abilities among Singapore secondary students: a Rasch model measurement analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122openalex-snapshot
A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.018openalex-snapshot
Developing young children's computational thinking with educational robotics: An interaction effect between gender and scaffolding strategy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.020openalex-snapshot
Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.022openalex-snapshot
Supporting all learners in school-wide computational thinking: A cross-case qualitative analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.005openalex-snapshot
Learning to code or coding to learn? A systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104083openalex-snapshot
Mapping computational thinking through programming in K-12 education: A conceptual model based on a systematic literature Review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104379openalex-snapshot
Computational thinking for teachers: Development of a localised E-learning system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104425openalex-snapshot
A cognitive definition of computational thinking in primary education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104457openalex-snapshot
Programming attitudes predict computational thinking: Analysis of differences in gender and programming experience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013openalex-snapshot
Programming experience promotes higher STEM motivation among first-grade girls
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2015.10.008openalex-snapshot
Advancing students’ computational thinking skills through educational robotics: A study on age and gender relevant differences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2042311openalex-snapshot
Evaluation and developmental suggestions on undergraduates’ computational thinking: a theoretical framework guided by Marzano’s new taxonomy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2837openalex-snapshot
Revising the Declaration of Helsinki
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1089733.1089734openalex-snapshot
Lowering the barriers to programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734357openalex-snapshot
Scalable game design and the development of a checklist for getting computational thinking into public schools
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2481449.2481466openalex-snapshot
Promoting computational thinking with programming
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/2513456.2513484openalex-snapshot
First year student performance in a test for computational thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11openalex-snapshot
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633115608444openalex-snapshot
An Exploration of Three-Dimensional Integrated Assessment for Computational Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00352-0openalex-snapshot
A social cognitive perspective on gender disparities in self-efficacy, interest, and aspirations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): the influence of cultural and gender norms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00391-7openalex-snapshot
The computational thinking for science (CT-S) framework: operationalizing CT-S for K–12 science education researchers and educators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.13140/rg.2.1.4203.4329openalex-snapshot
COMPUTATIONAL THINKING TEST: DESIGN GUIDELINES AND CONTENT VALIDATION
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14201/eks.21443openalex-snapshot
¿Aprender con robótica en Educación Primaria? Un medio de estimular el pensamiento computacional
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0475-18.2019openalex-snapshot
Gender in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: Issues, Causes, Solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1615/jwomenminorscieneng.2014007246openalex-snapshot
INVESTIGATING FORTY YEARS OF STEM RESEARCH: HOW EXPLANATIONS FOR THE GENDER GAP HAVE EVOLVED OVER TIME
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.115.9.5openalex-snapshot
Tendencies towards Computational Thinking: A Content Analysis Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2022.112.3openalex-snapshot
Assessing Algorithmic Thinking Skills in Relation to Gender in Early Childhood
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2505/4/tst14_081_05_53openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking in High School Science Classrooms: Exploring the Framework and NGSS
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x027005006openalex-snapshot
A Longitudinal Study of Gender Differences in Young Children’s Mathematical Thinking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010039openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking and Educational Technology: A Scoping Review of the Literature
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129openalex-snapshot
ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i10.30043openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking (CT) Among University Students
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.6018/red.402621openalex-snapshot
El pensamiento computacional en Educación. Análisis bibliométrico y temático.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-0853-9_5openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking Integration by Design-Based Learning Perspective Implementation Example of AI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2026.105620openalex-snapshot
Latent profile analysis of primary students’ computational thinking concepts: Stability and mobility of profile membership after one year of study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2026.2634837openalex-snapshot
Attitudes toward mathematics and technology in computational thinking: Creative self-concept as mediator
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icaie64856.2025.11158007openalex-snapshot
Fostering Students' Computational Thinking Through Experiential Learning in Artificial Intelligence Course
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-00536-3openalex-snapshot
Psychometric properties of full WHODAS 2.0 questionnaire for application through phone surveys: an experience in PERSIAN traffic cohort
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323166openalex-snapshot
The impact of computer science education in primary schools: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial in Iraq
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.17openalex-snapshot
Computational Thinking Skill Level of Senior High School Students Majoring in Natural Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1497284openalex-snapshot
Unpacking teachers' value beliefs about computational thinking and programming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1778718openalex-snapshot
Machine learning and educational robotics, an implementation in initial university teacher training and for practicing teachers in primary education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/app14177933openalex-snapshot
Leveraging Gamification in ICT Education: Examining Gender Differences and Learning Outcomes in Programming Courses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081214openalex-snapshot
Exploring Artificial Intelligence Through Robotics and Machine Learning: Perceptions of Pre-Service Teachers, Elementary School Students, and In-Service Teachers
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.37134/jictie.vol13.1.1.2026openalex-snapshot
Assessing Computational Thinking Among Pre-Service Design and Technology Teachers in a Malaysian Teacher Education Institute
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.