On the public citation graph
Is the drive for reproducible science having a detrimental effect on what is published?
0 signed · 55 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1960.03820060160039openalex-snapshot
Patterns of Discovery : An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002openalex-snapshot
Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01553188openalex-snapshot
Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02683184openalex-snapshot
The methods of science … and those by which we live
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90209-2openalex-snapshot
Exploratory data analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-7799(02)01985-6openalex-snapshot
The history of the peer-review process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0368-1742(26)80018-9openalex-snapshot
Statistical Methods for Research Workers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511621123.002openalex-snapshot
Introduction: Science and pseudoscience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511751776openalex-snapshot
Rescuing Science from Politics: Regulation and the Distortion of Scientific Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139171434openalex-snapshot
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/533452aopenalex-snapshot
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/535466aopenalex-snapshot
Time to remodel the journal impact factor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3288openalex-snapshot
The fickle P value generates irreproducible results
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth1207-983openalex-snapshot
An intelligently designed response
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021openalex-snapshot
A manifesto for reproducible science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114openalex-snapshot
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0952813x.2017.1413140openalex-snapshot
Reproducible research: a minority opinion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/656904openalex-snapshot
Irreducible Incoherence and Intelligent Design: A Look into the Conceptual Toolbox of a Pseudoscience
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104322958481openalex-snapshot
Interactive journal concept for improved scientific publishing and quality assurance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195157420.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Creationism's Trojan Horse
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/39.3.403openalex-snapshot
Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp011openalex-snapshot
How Science Textbooks Treat Scientific Method: A Philosopher's Perspective
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cww036openalex-snapshot
Novel or reproducible: That is the question
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0036openalex-snapshot
350 years of scientific periodicals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1933.0009openalex-snapshot
IX. On the problem of the most efficient tests of statistical hypotheses
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969660openalex-snapshot
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4930898openalex-snapshot
To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1724openalex-snapshot
Journals unite for reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/1553374.1553546openalex-snapshot
Workshop summary: The fourth workshop on evaluation methods for machine learning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/007327536800700101openalex-snapshot
Theories of Scientific Method from Plato to Mach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124openalex-snapshot
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1575163openalex-snapshot
The Advancement of Science and Its Burdens: The Jefferson Lecture and Other Essays
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2064130openalex-snapshot
Against Method, Outline of an Anarchistic Theory of Knowledge.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2186103openalex-snapshot
The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3119338openalex-snapshot
Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3233/isu-170846openalex-snapshot
Open science – towards reproducible research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5479/sil.52126.39088015628399openalex-snapshot
Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7810176openalex-snapshot
Predatory Publishing, Questionable Peer Review, and Fraudulent Conferences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.187763openalex-snapshot
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.31-2650openalex-snapshot
The golem: what everyone should know about science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7916/d84b38qkopenalex-snapshot
A Brief History of the Reproducibility Movement
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1250openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility crisis, the scientific method, and the quality of published studies: Untangling the knot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100655openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility, Replicability and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33658openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility in chemistry research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00375497261444678openalex-snapshot
Advancing reproducibility and replicability in simulation: Challenges and opportunities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36850/f4c4-4a38openalex-snapshot
How to Get There From Here? Barriers and Enablers on the Road Towards Reproducibility in Research
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.