On the public citation graph

Questionable Metascience Practices

https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575
0 signed · 110 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119170174.epcn519openalex-extracted
Open Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1208openalex-extracted
Pre‐registration: Why and How
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1209openalex-extracted
Preregistration Is Neither Sufficient nor Necessary for Good Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1224openalex-extracted
Is the drive for reproducible science having a detrimental effect on what is published?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919openalex-extracted
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21730openalex-extracted
Open for whom? The need to define open science for science education
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_614openalex-extracted
Methodologism/Methodological Imperative
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_32openalex-extracted
Adversarial Collaboration: The Next Science Reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09490-3openalex-extracted
Metascience as a Scientific Social Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02433-0openalex-extracted
What type of Type I error? Contrasting the Neyman–Pearson and Fisherian approaches in the context of exact and direct replications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03276-4openalex-extracted
When to adjust alpha during multiple testing: a consideration of disjunction, conjunction, and individual testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0065-xopenalex-extracted
Grounds for Ambiguity: Justifiable Bases for Engaging in Questionable Research Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0269-1openalex-extracted
The limits of replicability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00324-7openalex-extracted
Experimenter as automaton; experimenter as human: exploring the position of the researcher in scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.010openalex-extracted
Publication and other reporting biases in cognitive sciences: detection, prevalence, and prevention
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.009openalex-extracted
Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.009openalex-extracted
Is Preregistration Worthwhile?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511524059openalex-extracted
Constructing the Subject
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2022.4openalex-extracted
Breaking free
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.45openalex-extracted
Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x17001972openalex-extracted
Making replication mainstream
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000192openalex-extracted
Registered Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0167.38.2.204openalex-extracted
Theory-driven science and naive empiricism in counseling psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000154openalex-extracted
Perceived crisis and reforms: Issues, explanations, and remedies.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000169openalex-extracted
What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000246openalex-extracted
A meta-psychological perspective on the decade of replication failures in social psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000326openalex-extracted
I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128openalex-extracted
When Does HARKing Hurt? Identifying When Different Types of Undisclosed Post Hoc Hypothesizing Harm Scientific Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000135openalex-extracted
An Evaluation of Four Solutions to the Forking Paths Problem: Adjusted Alpha, Preregistration, Sensitivity Analyses, and Abandoning the Neyman-Pearson Approach
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0061802openalex-extracted
The problem of quantification in psychological science.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0074554openalex-extracted
Mathematical vs. scientific significance.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000307openalex-extracted
Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: A bank of lesson plans and resources.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000129openalex-extracted
The replication crisis: How might philosophy and theory of psychology be of use?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000137openalex-extracted
The replication crisis in psychology: An overview for theoretical and philosophical psychology.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/teo0000171openalex-extracted
Replication and reform: Vagaries of a social movement.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-01307-2openalex-extracted
Rein in the four horsemen of irreproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14203-0openalex-extracted
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021openalex-extracted
A manifesto for reproducible science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7openalex-extracted
The past, present and future of Registered Reports
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01203-8openalex-extracted
Aspiring to greater intellectual humility in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01497-2openalex-extracted
Reducing bias, increasing transparency and calibrating confidence with preregistration
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708272114openalex-extracted
Is science really facing a reproducibility crisis, and do we need it to?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114openalex-extracted
The preregistration revolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2021.1901709openalex-extracted
Open science reforms: Strengths, challenges, and future directions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2021.1943292openalex-extracted
Replicability Crisis and Scientific Reforms: Overlooked Issues and Unmet Challenges
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2020.1837360openalex-extracted
The seven deadly sins of psychology a manifesto for reforming the culture of scientific practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771openalex-extracted
Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705451openalex-extracted
Why Replication Is Overrated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy051openalex-extracted
Understanding the Replication Crisis as a Base Rate Fallacy
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab032openalex-extracted
The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197518977.001.0001openalex-extracted
How Social Science Got Better
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197555620.001.0001openalex-extracted
Perspectival Realism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672110.003.0011openalex-extracted
Scientific Objectivity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.200805openalex-extracted
The case for formal methodology in scientific reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.221042openalex-extracted
The logical structure of experiments lays the foundation for a theory of reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542018000036b009openalex-extracted
Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12541openalex-extracted
Ad hominem rhetoric in scientific psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2011.00222.xopenalex-extracted
Presenting Post Hoc Hypotheses as A Priori: Ethical and Theoretical Issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12525openalex-extracted
Scientific progress: Four accounts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-extracted
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114157openalex-extracted
Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836openalex-extracted
Psychology's Renaissance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011845openalex-extracted
Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090221-035954openalex-extracted
Reproducibility in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.000245openalex-extracted
Three Fragments From a Sociologist's Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071openalex-extracted
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221126388openalex-extracted
Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03616843211036460openalex-extracted
Open Science From a Qualitative, Feminist Perspective: Epistemological Dogmas and a Call for Critical Examination
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632openalex-extracted
False-Positive Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-extracted
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319835322openalex-extracted
Psychologists psychologizing scientific psychology: An epistemological reading of the replication crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319838343openalex-extracted
Putting Popper to work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625211022181openalex-extracted
No harm in being self-corrective: Self-criticism and reform intentions increase researchers’ epistemic trustworthiness and credibility in the eyes of the public
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211067779openalex-extracted
Credibility Beyond Replicability: Improving the Four Validities in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868320931366openalex-extracted
A Validity-Based Framework for Understanding Replication in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211015636openalex-extracted
The Tone Debate: Knowledge, Self, and Social Order
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046514openalex-extracted
Understanding Replication in a Way That Is True to Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046518openalex-extracted
How to True Psychology’s Objects
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211066466openalex-extracted
The Function of Literature in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680221083876openalex-extracted
Metascience Is Not Enough – A Plea for Psychological Humanities in the Wake of the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/135910530000500306openalex-extracted
Methodolatry and Qualitative Health Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612459058openalex-extracted
Scientific Utopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463078openalex-extracted
An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514450openalex-extracted
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691614528518openalex-extracted
Expectations for Replications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616689062openalex-extracted
Is Psychology Moving in the Right Direction? An Analysis of the Evidentiary Value Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617707314openalex-extracted
Cultural Change Over Time: Why Replicability Should Not Be the Gold Standard in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617745651openalex-extracted
The Creative Cycle and the Growth of Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617751884openalex-extracted
Implications of the Credibility Revolution for Productivity, Creativity, and Progress
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966796openalex-extracted
Arrested Theory Development: The Misguided Distinction Between Exploratory and Confirmatory Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970604openalex-extracted
Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211017098openalex-extracted
Beyond Statistical Ritual: Theory in Psychological Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041116openalex-extracted
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819886519openalex-extracted
The psychology of experimental psychologists: Overcoming cognitive constraints to improve research: The 47th Sir Frederic Bartlett Lecture
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615612150openalex-extracted
Questionable Research Practices Revisited
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920954925openalex-extracted
A Traveler’s Guide to the Multiverse: Promises, Pitfalls, and a Framework for the Evaluation of Analytic Decisions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216125openalex-extracted
Scientific discovery in a model-centric framework: Reproducibility, innovation, and epistemic diversity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.12691openalex-extracted
Replicability of Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-socsci.arysbi.v1openalex-extracted
Research practices and assessment of research misconduct
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691209753openalex-extracted
Science as Social Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.16.4.p376openalex-extracted
Does preregistration improve the credibility of research findings?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.797openalex-extracted
Registered Reports as a vaccine against research bias: Past, present and future
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/fgv79openalex-extracted
Embedding open and reproducible science into teaching: A bank of lesson plans and resources
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02183openalex-extracted
Replication and the Establishment of Scientific Truth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.36850/mr4openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4099010openalex-extracted
#bropenscience is broken science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.53962/rqj5-kkxdopenalex-extracted
Charting the Constellation of Science Reform
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.49-6848openalex-extracted
Ignorance: how it drives science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226292144.001.0001openalex-extracted
Scientific Perspectivism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.71601openalex-extracted
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.