On the public citation graph
Gradual Valuation for Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
0 signed · 80 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.20307openalex-snapshot
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1737-3_6openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic Argumentation Systems
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035642openalex-snapshot
Normative argumentation and qualitative probability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90069-aopenalex-snapshot
A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90071-5openalex-snapshot
Conditional entailment: Bridging two approaches to default reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(92)90103-5openalex-snapshot
How to reason defeasibly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)00041-xopenalex-snapshot
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451379-3/50014-5openalex-snapshot
Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50018-4openalex-snapshot
Dialectic reasoning with inconsistent information
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8openalex-snapshot
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1452-8.50104-4openalex-snapshot
Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1452-8.50144-5openalex-snapshot
Specification and Evaluation of Preferences under Uncertainty
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00071-6openalex-snapshot
A logic-based theory of deductive arguments☆☆This is an extended version of a paper entitled “Towards a logic-based theory of argumentation” published in the Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'2000), Austin, TX, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00134-5openalex-snapshot
An argument-based approach to reasoning with specificity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(01)00145-xopenalex-snapshot
Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-3702(98)00078-2openalex-snapshot
Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0306-4379(01)00020-5openalex-snapshot
Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision making: the HERMES system
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269888904000098openalex-snapshot
Argumentation-based negotiation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1014482025714openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic Argumentation Systems and Abduction
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1021603608656openalex-snapshot
Inferring from Inconsistency in Preference-Based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/11663081.1997.10510900openalex-snapshot
Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/13.3.429openalex-snapshot
Persuasion in Practical Argument Using Value-based Argumentation Frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/8.3.261openalex-snapshot
Agents that reason and negotiate by arguing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/9.2.215openalex-snapshot
Robust semantics for argumentation frameworks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1109/icmas.2000.858428openalex-snapshot
Modelling dialogues using argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00025.xopenalex-snapshot
A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/261618.261622openalex-snapshot
The Zeno argumentation framework
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/860575.860699openalex-snapshot
Towards interest-based negotiation
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/int.20389openalex-snapshot
Coalitions of arguments: A tool for handling bipolar argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/spe.3137openalex-snapshot
Valuating requirements arguments in the online user's forum for requirements decision‐making: The CrowdRE‐VArg framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_4openalex-snapshot
Bipolar abstract argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89391-0_14openalex-snapshot
Handling Support Cycles and Collective Interactions in the Logical Encoding of Higher-Order Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_15openalex-snapshot
A Principle-Based Analysis of Bipolar Argumentation Semantics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63797-1_13openalex-snapshot
A Logic of Weighted Reasons for Explainable Inference in AI
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-76235-2_2openalex-snapshot
Integrating User Preferences into Gradual Bipolar Argumentation for Personalised Decision Support
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-32335-4_7openalex-snapshot
Characteristics, Convergence and Divergence of Modular Semantics for Bipolar Weighted Argumentation Graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28460-6_1openalex-snapshot
Comparing and Integrating Argumentation-Based with Matrix-Based Decision Support in Arg&Dec
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33509-4_21openalex-snapshot
Identifying Malicious Behavior in Multi-party Bipolar Argumentation Debates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61581-3_3openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of Arguments in Weighted Bipolar Graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69131-2_23openalex-snapshot
Capturing Bipolar Argumentation in Non-flat Assumption-Based Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90050-6_12openalex-snapshot
Strategic Dialogical Argumentation Using Multi-criteria Decision Making with Application to Epistemic and Emotional Aspects of Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_11openalex-snapshot
A Three-Layer Argumentation Framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_21openalex-snapshot
An Argumentation-Based Approach for Automatic Evaluation of Design Debates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-025-10896-2openalex-snapshot
Bipolar argumentative semantics for t-norm based fuzzy logics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9594-6openalex-snapshot
Combining Social Choice Theory and Argumentation: Enabling Collective Decision Making
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9512-1openalex-snapshot
Petitio principii and circular argumentation as seen from a theory of dialectical structures
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.05.001openalex-snapshot
Argumentation in artificial intelligence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.005openalex-snapshot
Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2020.103236openalex-snapshot
Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2018.05.004openalex-snapshot
Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006openalex-snapshot
Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.07.004openalex-snapshot
An argumentative approach for discovering relevant opinions in Twitter with probabilistic valued relationships
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2014.01.011openalex-snapshot
An extensible argument-based ontology matching negotiation approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19462166.2014.1001791openalex-snapshot
Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/coginf.2011.6016170openalex-snapshot
Argumentation framework with weighted argument structure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/icdew.2010.5452705openalex-snapshot
Ontology alignment argumentation with mutual dependency between arguments and mappings
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/ictai.2015.46openalex-snapshot
Some Supplementaries to the Counting Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/2801081.2801098openalex-snapshot
Envisioning a collaborative smart home solution based on argumentative dialogues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/30504554261421868openalex-snapshot
An Approach to Personalized Decision Support Based on Gradual Bipolar Argumentation Enhanced With User Preferences
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14409openalex-snapshot
A Model to Support Collective Reasoning: Formalization, Analysis and Computational Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-45openalex-snapshot
Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w19-4518openalex-snapshot
Gradual Argumentation Evaluation for Stance Aggregation in Automated Fake News Detection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21427/9hcs-1s56openalex-snapshot
Ranking Semantics Based on Subgraphs Analysis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24348/coria.2008.385openalex-snapshot
Annotation collective dans le contexte RI : définition d'une plate-forme pour expérimenter la validation sociale.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0027openalex-snapshot
Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/720openalex-snapshot
Weighted Bipolar Argumentation Graphs: Axioms and Semantics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2020/265openalex-snapshot
Ranking Semantics for Argumentation Systems With Necessities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-453openalex-snapshot
GRAFIX: a Tool for Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-686-6-431openalex-snapshot
Assessing Weight of Opinion by Aggregating Coalitions of Arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-160014openalex-snapshot
Collective argumentation: A survey of aggregation issues around argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190476openalex-snapshot
Logical theories and abstract argumentation: A survey of existing works
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-190479openalex-snapshot
Similarity notions in bipolar abstract argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/faia200166openalex-snapshot
Gradual Semantics for Logic-Based Bipolar Graphs Using T-(Co)norms
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4204/eptcs.335.8openalex-snapshot
Collective Argumentation: The Case of Aggregating Support-Relations of Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5555/1931390.1931440openalex-snapshot
Collective annotation: perspectives for information retrieval improvement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/1098bc08zbd43z464bz8871z9add32dade5fopenalex-snapshot
Principles and Practices for Bipolar Semantics and Impact Measures in Computational Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/b525d651za4f6z41a3zb4ddzf1ee936dfec7openalex-snapshot
Ranking-based Semantics for Abstract Argumentation
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.