On the public citation graph

Normative argumentation and qualitative probability

https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035642
0 signed · 38 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/int.4550050508openalex-snapshot
A probabilistic commonsense reasoner
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_64openalex-snapshot
A unified framework for hypothetical and practical reasoning (2): Lessons from medical applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_93openalex-snapshot
Defining normative systems for qualitative argumentation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0035642openalex-snapshot
Normative argumentation and qualitative probability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(94)90057-4openalex-snapshot
Justification and defeat
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(95)00090-9openalex-snapshot
Qualitative probabilities for default reasoning, belief revision, and causal modeling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50054-8openalex-snapshot
Argumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50055-xopenalex-snapshot
Argument Calculus and Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1451-1.50056-1openalex-snapshot
Argumentation as a General Framework for Uncertain Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-55860-332-5.50024-9openalex-snapshot
On the Relation between Kappa Calculus and Probabilistic Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1987.tb00178.xopenalex-snapshot
Defeat among arguments: a system of defeasible inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1995.tb00025.xopenalex-snapshot
A LOGIC OF ARGUMENTATION FOR REASONING UNDER UNCERTAINTY
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1302.4975openalex-snapshot
Refining Reasoning in Qualitative Probabilistic Networks
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.1302.4989openalex-snapshot
An Order of Magnitude Calculus

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/int.20307openalex-snapshot
On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/int.v23:10openalex-snapshot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/11518655_32openalex-snapshot
Gradual Valuation for Bipolar Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49426-x_13openalex-snapshot
Arguing about beliefs and actions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-49426-x_7openalex-snapshot
Qualitative risk assessment fulfils a need
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-61313-7_93openalex-snapshot
Defining normative systems for qualitative argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_13openalex-snapshot
Dialogue Games for Agent Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-98197-0_4openalex-snapshot
Bipolar abstract argumentation systems
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87803-2_24openalex-snapshot
A Game-Theoretic Measure of Argument Strength for Abstract Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_3openalex-snapshot
Dominant Decisions by Argumentation Agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29184-5_1openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5357-0_4openalex-snapshot
A Survey of Uncertainties and Their Consequences in Probabilistic Legal Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/bf02812444openalex-snapshot
Representing and applying knowledge for argumentation in a social context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-012-9121-zopenalex-snapshot
Argument diagram extraction from evidential Bayesian networks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451379-3/50014-5openalex-snapshot
Gradual handling of contradiction in argumentation frameworks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijar.2016.11.003openalex-snapshot
Uses and computation of imprecise probabilities from statistical data and expert arguments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/s0888-613x(98)10011-7openalex-snapshot
A proof theoretic approach to qualitative probabilistic reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1109/imcsit.2010.5680035openalex-snapshot
Argumentative agents
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/371578.371581openalex-snapshot
Logical models of argument
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.14409openalex-snapshot
A Model to Support Collective Reasoning: Formalization, Analysis and Computational Assessment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1411openalex-snapshot
Graduality in Argumentation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3233/aac-210016openalex-snapshot
Probabilistic interpretations of argumentative attacks: Logical and experimental results
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.65109/vgxu8447openalex-snapshot
Combining statistics and arguments to compute trust
showing the first 23 of 24 · page through all 24
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.