On the public citation graph

A well placed trust?: Public perceptions of the governance of DNA databases

https://doi.org/10.1080/09581590500523186
0 signed · 77 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00142-9openalex-snapshot
Trust and the development of health care as a social institution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00494-xopenalex-snapshot
Social capital and trust in providers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511606250openalex-snapshot
Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0007131022000000545openalex-snapshot
Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0950543022000028965openalex-snapshot
Gift Relationships in Genetics Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677032000069691openalex-snapshot
The governance of human genetics: Policy discourse and constructions of public trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677032000147199openalex-snapshot
‘Science is really needed—that’s all I know': informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/1/004openalex-snapshot
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2001.00452.xopenalex-snapshot
Genetically Modified Crops: The Ethical and Social Issues
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500302openalex-snapshot
“What Do You Think about Genetic Medicine?” Facilitating Sociable Public Discourse on Developments in the New Genetics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/096366259800700104openalex-snapshot
The new genetics and health: mobilizing lay expertise
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2077015openalex-snapshot
The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.6769openalex-snapshot
The DNA Mystique
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-4540openalex-snapshot
Autonomy and trust in bioethics

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1554744openalex-extracted
The Discourse of DNA: What Research Subjects Say About Participating (or Not) in a Genomic Biobank
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78578-9_5openalex-snapshot
When the Brand Bites Back
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33525-4_10openalex-snapshot
Big Data Governance: Solidarity and the Patient Voice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78845-4_2openalex-snapshot
Trading in Cold Blood?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33116-9_16openalex-snapshot
Conveying Information, Generating Trust: The Role of Certifications in Biobanking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0193-9openalex-snapshot
Relating to Participants: How Close Do Biobanks and Donors Really Want to Be?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9810-1openalex-snapshot
Public trust and ‘ethics review’ as a commodity: the case of Genomics England Limited and the UK’s 100,000 genomes project
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-026-00947-yopenalex-snapshot
Your DNA, your concerns: public attitudes toward donation of genomic data for research in four Latin American countries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-012-0421-5openalex-snapshot
Community-Based Partnership to Identify Keys to Biospecimen Research Participation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-015-0042-yopenalex-snapshot
Models of biobanks and implications for reproductive health innovation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2009.03.005openalex-snapshot
The principle of proportionality in biometrics:Case studies from Norway
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.028openalex-snapshot
Understanding public reactions to commercialization of biobanks and use of biobank resources
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675984.003openalex-snapshot
Do We All Have Feminised Bodies Now?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675984.008openalex-snapshot
Biobanks and Databases: Our Bodies, but Not Ourselves
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/9781316675984.010openalex-snapshot
Reclaiming the Biomedical Commons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511778193.006openalex-snapshot
Health and wealth, law and order: banking DNA against disease and crime
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511778193.014openalex-snapshot
Biosurveillance and biocivic concerns, from ‘truth’ to ‘trust’: the Australian forensic DNA terrain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139875981.007openalex-snapshot
Biobanks and feedback
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1745855206004029openalex-snapshot
Population Biobanks: The Ethical Gravity of Informed Consent
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2010.106openalex-snapshot
Hypothetical and factual willingness to participate in biobank research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09581590701824086openalex-snapshot
Generation Scotland: consulting publics and specialists at an early stage in a genetic database's development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2011.560246openalex-snapshot
Labouring towards self-fulfilment: personal genomics and the ‘participatory turn’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2007.11427674openalex-snapshot
Biobanks and Blanket Consent: The Proper Place of the Public Good and Public Perception Rationales
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2010.507487openalex-snapshot
Biobank governance: a lesson in trust
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2011.0029openalex-snapshot
Managing the Introduction of Biobanks to Potential Participants: Lessons from a Deliberative Public Forum
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2014.0028openalex-snapshot
Factors that Affect Willingness to Donate Blood for the Purpose of Biospecimen Research in the Korean American Community
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1089/bio.2021.0036openalex-snapshot
Willingness to Donate Remnant Human Biospecimens in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldm026openalex-snapshot
Forensic databases: benefits and ethical and social costs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq136openalex-snapshot
Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13067openalex-snapshot
The reported impact of public involvement in biobanks: A scoping review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1609.2011.00251.xopenalex-snapshot
Patients' experiences on donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for the future research use of the tissue: a systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2007.00166.xopenalex-snapshot
Partnership in U.K. Biobank: A Third Way for Genomic Property?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11124/01938924-201109420-00001openalex-snapshot
Patientsʼ experiences towards the donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for secondary use: A systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2011-108openalex-snapshot
Patientsʼ experiences towards the donation of their residual biological samples and the impact of these experiences on the type of consent given for secondary use: A systematic review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1159/000262329openalex-snapshot
Donors Perceptions of Consent to and Feedback from Biobank Research: Time to Acknowledge Diversity?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1159/000336671openalex-snapshot
The Privacy-Reciprocity Connection in Biobanking: Comparing German with UK Strategies
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1159/000375441openalex-snapshot
The Impact of Commercialisation and Genetic Data Sharing Arrangements on Public Trust and the Intention to Participate in Biobank Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0023677221993157openalex-snapshot
The social aspects of genome editing: publics as stakeholders, populations and participants in animal research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0162243909340267openalex-snapshot
National Biobanks: Clinical Labor, Risk Production, and the Creation of Biovalue
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0270467614549415openalex-snapshot
Public Understandings of the Forensic Use of DNA
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616644378openalex-snapshot
Public Responses to Forensic DNA Testing Backlogs
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510361655openalex-snapshot
Can the governance of a population genetic data bank effect recruitment? Evidence from the public consultation of Generation Scotland
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515623925openalex-snapshot
Identifying public expectations of genetic biobanks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/09636625241230864openalex-snapshot
A systematic literature review of the ‘commercialisation effect’ on public attitudes towards biobank and genomic data repositories
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1363459311425513openalex-snapshot
The use of routinely collected patient data for research: A critical review
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/1556264616668973openalex-snapshot
Development and Validation of the Biomedical Research Trust Scale (BRTS) in English and Spanish
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/1746-5354-3-1-1openalex-snapshot
Lay expertise: why involve the public in biobank governance?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-019-0094-5openalex-snapshot
Questioning the rhetoric of a ‘willing population’ in Finnish biobanking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13130/schmietow-bettina_phd2014-03-25openalex-snapshot
PROPERTY REDUX. OWNERSHIP OF HUMAN TISSUE AND THE GOVERNANCE OF POST-GENOMIC RESEARCH BIOBANKS
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1515/jibl.2009.5openalex-snapshot
Attitude toward Public Trust; the Discourses of Accountability and Transparency in Biobank Japan
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1553/ita-pacita-06openalex-snapshot
PACITA: Expert Working Group report for the European Future Panel on Public Health Genomics (January 2014)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.78openalex-snapshot
Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2014.302138openalex-snapshot
The Tobacco Industry, Researchers, and Ethical Access to UK Biobank: Using the Public Interest and Public Good
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2147/bsam.s64577openalex-snapshot
Biobank consent models – are we moving toward increased participant engagement in biobanking?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2217/17410541.5.4.339openalex-snapshot
Rhode Islanders‘ Attitudes Towards the Development of a Statewide Genetic Biobank
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2020-0113openalex-snapshot
Attitudes of Costa Rican Individuals Towards Donation of Personal Genetic Data for Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv36zppr.15openalex-snapshot
Informing the Debate
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2791/41701openalex-snapshot
Biobanks in Europe: Prospects for Harmonisation and Networking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.711614openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for Creating Codes of Conduct for Processing Personal Data in Biobanking Based on the GDPR art.40
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4236/ojepi.2019.93016openalex-snapshot
Assessment of Knowledge, Attitudes and Support of Health Professionals towards Biobanks in Eastern Morocco
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602158-5openalex-snapshot
Governing Biobanks: An Introduction
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5324/nje.v21i2.1502openalex-snapshot
Peeking into the black box of privacy – biobank participants on the importance of recognition
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5661/bger-25-429openalex-snapshot
The Ethics of Research Biobanking: A Critical Review of the Literature
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.