On the public citation graph

The Science of Open (Communication) Science: Toward an Evidence-Driven Understanding of Quality Criteria in Communication Research

https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab032
0 signed · 70 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/phbl.19790351203openalex-snapshot
Wissenschaft und Humanum
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511818691openalex-snapshot
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055413000014openalex-snapshot
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096515000189openalex-snapshot
Research Preregistration in Political Science: The Case, Counterarguments, and a Response to Critiques
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.577openalex-snapshot
The hostile media phenomenon: Biased perception and perceptions of media bias in coverage of the Beirut massacre.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/533452aopenalex-snapshot
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14203-0openalex-snapshot
Low replicability can support robust and efficient science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0294-7openalex-snapshot
Easy preregistration will benefit any research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01142-4openalex-snapshot
Initial evidence of research quality of registered reports compared with the standard publishing model
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01148-yopenalex-snapshot
Research on registered report research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618569114openalex-snapshot
Meta-assessment of bias in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100769118openalex-snapshot
A better approach for dealing with reproducibility and replicability in science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1753441openalex-snapshot
Preregistration as a way to limit questionable research practice in advertising research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/105846000414250openalex-snapshot
Connecting News Media Use with Gaps in Knowledge and Participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2018.1458084openalex-snapshot
When Communication Meets Computation: Opportunities, Challenges, and Pitfalls in Computational Communication Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1685660openalex-snapshot
Open Communication Science: A Primer on Why and Some Recommendations for How
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds015openalex-snapshot
Exemplifying a Dispositional Approach to Cross-Cultural Spiral of Silence Research: Fear of Social Isolation and the Inclination to Self-Censor
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz052openalex-snapshot
An Agenda for Open Science in Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv048openalex-snapshot
Social Media Analyses for Social Measurement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz041openalex-snapshot
The Polls—Trends
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.13.249847openalex-snapshot
Open Science Saves Lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2003.tb02598.xopenalex-snapshot
A "Mix of Attributes" Approach to the Study of Media Effects and New Communication Technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01334.xopenalex-snapshot
Presidential Campaign Dynamics and the Ebb and Flow of Talk as a Moderator: Media Exposure, Knowledge, and Political Discussion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251722openalex-snapshot
Reverse-engineering censorship in China: Randomized experimentation and participant observation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.491openalex-snapshot
Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.359.6377.725openalex-snapshot
Artificial intelligence faces reproducibility crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz8170openalex-snapshot
Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219887663openalex-snapshot
Editorial Essay: The Tumult over Transparency: Decoupling Transparency from Replication in Establishing Trustworthy Qualitative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127211005551openalex-snapshot
Self-correction in science: The diagnostic and integrative motives for replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662514545909openalex-snapshot
Ignorance or bias? Evaluating the ideological and informational drivers of communication gaps about climate change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520954370openalex-snapshot
The “replication crisis” in the public eye: Germans’ awareness and perceptions of the (ir)reproducibility of scientific research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180x07302881openalex-snapshot
Finally Informing the Electorate? How the Internet Got People Thinking about Presidential Politics in 2004
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313517688openalex-snapshot
Discrepancies between registration and publication of randomised controlled trials: an observational study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0520-3openalex-snapshot
Comparison of registered and published outcomes in randomized controlled trials: a systematic review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17226/25303openalex-snapshot
Reproducibility and Replicability in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i3.3128openalex-snapshot
A Computational Approach to Analyzing the Twitter Debate on Gaming Disorder
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676160openalex-snapshot
Differential Privacy for Social Science Inference
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2196/19273openalex-snapshot
Tracking Social Media Discourse About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Development of a Public Coronavirus Twitter Data Set
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1770602openalex-snapshot
Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9y3mpopenalex-snapshot
Null-hacking, a lurking problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.23383openalex-snapshot
Making sense of replications

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.360openalex-snapshot
Support for misinformation regulation on social media: It is the perceived harm of misinformation that matters, not the perceived amount
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-74050-3_23openalex-snapshot
Promoting Sustainable Finance for Enhanced Economic Growth in Sub-Saharan Africa
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-49131-4_11openalex-snapshot
Ethik in der experimentellen Forschung
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-025-00481-0openalex-snapshot
Architectures of Trust: Open Science between Ivory Tower and Panopticon
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107537openalex-snapshot
Unintended effects of open data policy in online behavioral research: An experimental investigation of participants’ privacy concerns and research validity
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107769openalex-snapshot
Correcting climate change misinformation on social media: Reciprocal relationships between correcting others, anger, and environmental activism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102250openalex-snapshot
Trust in science amid a replication crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2021.10.009openalex-snapshot
Misinformed about the “infodemic?” Science’s ongoing struggle with misinformation.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2021.19openalex-snapshot
Twitter as research data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2400928121openalex-snapshot
Our changing information ecosystem for science and why it matters for effective science communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2025.2595452openalex-snapshot
Contextual Changes, Credible Conclusions? A Direct and Conceptual Replication of Shen et al.'s (2019) Study on Online Image Credibility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2023.2264406openalex-snapshot
Unraveling China’s digital traces: evaluating communication scholarship through a sociotechnical lens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/anncom/wlag042openalex-snapshot
Do algorithmic information environments mark the end of media effects research?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab033openalex-snapshot
Opening a Conversation on Open Communication Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac017openalex-snapshot
Trusting on the shoulders of open giants? Open science increases trust in science for the public and academics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0364.03openalex-snapshot
2. Open Science, Open Data: The ‘Open’ Movement in Scholarly Publishing
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221086263openalex-snapshot
The “Infodemic” Infodemic: Toward a More Nuanced Understanding of Truth-Claims and the Need for (Not) Combatting Misinformation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241262346openalex-snapshot
Normalizing Open Science Practice: Understandings, Evaluations, and Implementations of Open Science Practices in the Field of Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241301676openalex-snapshot
Between Innovation and Standardization: Best Practices and Inclusive Guidelines in Computational Communication Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7789openalex-snapshot
The Challenges of Replicating Volatile Platform-Data Studies: Replicating Schatto-Eckrodt et al. (2020)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.7836openalex-snapshot
Standardized Sampling for Systematic Literature Reviews (STAMP Method): Ensuring Reproducibility and Replicability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/g328copenalex-snapshot
Trusting on the Shoulders of Open Giants? Open Science Increases Trust in Science for the Public and Academics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.907745openalex-snapshot
Beyond Open Access: Conceptualizing Open Science for Knowledge Co-creation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36850/mr4openalex-snapshot
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.780openalex-snapshot
Themed Social Networking Groups as Effective Sources of Data: A Country-wide Survey on Invasive Bigheaded Carp (Hipophthalmichthys molitrix and H. nobilis) Detection and Distribution
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2022-1-2-151openalex-snapshot
Zeitschriftenlese
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5771/2192-4007-2023-4-277openalex-snapshot
Editorial to the Special Issue: (Re)Establishing quality criteria for content analysis: A critical perspective on the field’s core method
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.