On the public citation graph
From Norm-Violating to Sanction-Worthy: Understanding the Effects of Multiple Norm Violations in Online Political Discussion
0 signed · 52 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56273-5openalex-extracted
Online Incivility and Public Debate
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.024openalex-extracted
Perpetuating online sexism offline: Anonymity, interactivity, and the effects of sexist hashtags on social media
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030openalex-extracted
Cross-cutting exposure on social networking sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.015openalex-extracted
Online incivility in comment boards: Partisanship matters - But what I think matters more
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055402004264openalex-extracted
Cross-cutting Social Networks: Testing Democratic Theory in Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055405051452openalex-extracted
The New Videomalaise: Effects of Televised Incivility on Political Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305540707044xopenalex-extracted
Effects of “In-Your-Face” Television Discourse on Perceptions of a Legitimate Opposition
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491openalex-extracted
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540903510811openalex-extracted
The Role of Background Behavior in Televised Debates: Does Displaying Nonverbal Agreement and/or Disagreement Benefit Either Debater?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2021.1969429openalex-extracted
Effects of online incivility and emotions toward in-groups on cross-cutting attention and political participation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207openalex-extracted
What is political incivility?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2016.1273922openalex-extracted
Online Political Discourse: Exploring Differences in Effects of Civil and Uncivil Disagreement in News Website Comments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2021.1888450openalex-extracted
Can Interactive Media Attenuate Psychological Reactance to Health Messages? A Study of the Role Played by User Commenting and Audience Metrics in Persuasion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/105846002317246506openalex-extracted
Does Disagreement Contribute to More Deliberative Opinion?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600600977003openalex-extracted
Predicting Deliberative Conversation: The Impact of Discussion Networks, Media Use, and Political Cognitions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2014.882462openalex-extracted
The Structure of Communication Networks Matters: How Network Diversity, Centrality, and Context Influence Political Ambivalence, Participation, and Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1235639openalex-extracted
Exposure to Political Disagreement in Social Media Versus Face-to-Face and Anonymous Online Settings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1938464openalex-extracted
The strategic use of incivility in contemporary politics. The case of the 2018 Italian general election on Facebook
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2019.1566488openalex-extracted
‘I just don’t think she has a presidential look:’ the influence of sexism on candidate image
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000011openalex-extracted
The ‘Black Sheep Effect’: Social Categorization, Rejection of Ingroup Deviates, and Perception of Group Variability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1547833openalex-extracted
Protecting the Ladies: Benevolent Sexism, Heteronormativity, and Partisanship in Online Discussions of Gender-Neutral Bathrooms
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510500181459openalex-extracted
Managing social norms for persuasive impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2014.997416openalex-extracted
Incivility Online: Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Uncivil Political Posts in a Web-based Experiment
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab018openalex-extracted
Incivility as a Violation of Communication Norms—A Typology Based on Normative Expectations toward Political Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmaa011openalex-extracted
Online Social Regulation: When Everyday Diplomatic Skills for Harmonious Disagreement Break Down
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad018openalex-extracted
Differential perceptions of and reactions to incivil and intolerant user comments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab008openalex-extracted
Partisan Bias of Perceived Incivility and its Political Consequences: Evidence from Survey Experiments in Hong Kong
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.xopenalex-extracted
Disagreeing about Disagreement: How Conflict in Social Networks Affects Political Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12009openalex-extracted
The “Nasty Effect:” Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104openalex-extracted
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105openalex-extracted
Partisan Paths to Exposure Diversity: Differences in Pro- and Counterattitudinal News Consumption
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650204271400openalex-extracted
Talking Politics and Engaging Politics:
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650207309362openalex-extracted
Confusion or Enlightenment?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650215616861openalex-extracted
Influence of Discussion Incivility on Deliberation: An Examination of the Mediating Role of Moral Indignation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650216685625openalex-extracted
Negativity Bias or Backlash: Interaction With Civil and Uncivil Online Political News Content
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933openalex-extracted
Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314openalex-extracted
Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271180openalex-extracted
The Role of Defensive Confidence in Preference for Proattitudinal Information: How Believing That One Is Strong Can Sometimes Be a Defensive Weakness
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315626022openalex-extracted
Beyond Content of Conversation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783304048382openalex-extracted
Emotional and behavioural responses to everyday incivility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804041444openalex-extracted
Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211000666openalex-extracted
“What an idiot!” – How the appraisal of the writer of an uncivil comment impacts discussion behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211064001openalex-extracted
“Toxic atmosphere effect”: Uncivil online comments cue negative audience perceptions of news outlet credibility
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/20531680211050778openalex-extracted
The electoral implications of uncivil and intolerant rhetoric in American politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119862641openalex-extracted
We Should Not Get Rid of Incivility Online
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231180638openalex-extracted
Incivility in Online Discussion: An Examination of Impolite and Intolerant Comments
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315187280-6openalex-extracted
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.48-4153openalex-extracted
Rude democracy: civility and incivility in American politics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221130837openalex-snapshot
Selective Avoidance: Understanding How Position and Proportion of Online Incivility Influence News Engagement
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.