On the public citation graph
Rude democracy: civility and incivility in American politics
0 signed · 279 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1799.9048openalex-extracted
Affective and Behavioral Reactions to Elite-based Political Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4526739openalex-extracted
From Norm-Violating to Sanction-Worthy: Understanding the Effects of Multiple Norm Violations in Online Political Discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/9781394180844.ch21openalex-snapshot
Reputational Crisis in Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1002/crq.21114openalex-snapshot
Disrupting Deliberative Discourse: Strategic Political Incivility at the Local Level
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-41262-1_6openalex-snapshot
Justice Civility: William J. Brennan Jr.’s Free Speech Jurisprudence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27757-4_5openalex-snapshot
The Dreams of Technological Reason Generate Monsters
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_25openalex-snapshot
Improving the Debate: Interface Elements that Enhance Civility and Relevance in Online News Comments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87070-6_5openalex-snapshot
‘Kindness is Our Preference’: Hook-Up Apps As Technologies of Polite Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29148-7_13openalex-snapshot
How Politically Motivated Social Media and Lack of Political Diversity Corrupt Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-31469-8_5openalex-snapshot
Incivility Balanced? Civil vs. Uncivil Speech in Online Political Discussions as Dependent on Political Parallelism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35915-6_12openalex-snapshot
Automated Detection of Different Publication Patterns of Online Deliberation as a Research Domain
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54405-7_1openalex-snapshot
Politicians and the Attractions of Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54405-7_3openalex-snapshot
Citizens and the Seductive Power of Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54405-7_4openalex-snapshot
Incivility as a Tool for Social Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68952-9_52openalex-snapshot
Intellectual Safety and Intellectual Provocation in the Classroom: A Conceptual Model to Foster Deep Learning Among Students of Higher Education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97505-4_7openalex-snapshot
The Rhetorical Satisfactions of Hate Speech
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93284-2_9openalex-snapshot
User-Generated (Dis)Content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36540-0_2openalex-snapshot
Automatisierte (Gegen-)Rede? Social Bots als digitales Sprachrohr ihrer Nutzer*innen
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0467-9_4openalex-snapshot
Incivility from the UK Prime Minister’s Dispatch Box: A Comparative Study of PM Question Time Attacks, 2010–2020
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0894-3_2openalex-snapshot
Debasement Language as a Subset of Political Incivility: Characteristics and Effects
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-024-09658-0openalex-snapshot
AI Within Online Discussions: Rational, Civil, Privileged?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-018-9329-3openalex-snapshot
Boundary-work and the demarcation of civil from uncivil protest in the United States: control, legitimacy, and political inequality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.015openalex-snapshot
Online incivility in comment boards: Partisanship matters - But what I think matters more
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2019.100367openalex-snapshot
Exploring the metadiscursive realisation of incivility in TV news discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.008openalex-snapshot
Im/politeness and in/civility: A neglected relationship?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.031openalex-snapshot
Political speech acts in contrast: The case of calls to condemn in news interviews
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2022.7openalex-snapshot
Race, Gender, and the Politics of Incivility: How Identity Moderates Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s000305542300134xopenalex-snapshot
Toxic Speech and Limited Demand for Content Moderation on Social Media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000467openalex-snapshot
The Negative Consequences of Uncivil Political Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000480openalex-snapshot
The Rise and Fall of Nasty Politics in America
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096512000509openalex-snapshot
Incivility and Standing Firm: A Second Layer of Partisan Division
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/s1049096521000421openalex-snapshot
Time to Rethink Your Teaching Ideology?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000203openalex-snapshot
Cross-Cutting Exposure on Facebook and Political Participation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7_28openalex-snapshot
Facework and (Im)politeness in Political Exchanges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00046.skropenalex-snapshot
Constructing leadership through translating im/politeness
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00028533.2018.1446865openalex-snapshot
A tale of two parties: comparing the intensity of face threats in the democratic and republican primary debates of 2012 and 2016
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/00377996.2011.596860openalex-snapshot
A Challenge for Social Studies Educators: Increasing Civility in Schools and Society by Modeling Civic Virtues
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1624792openalex-snapshot
Echoslamming: how incivility interacts with cyberbalkanization on the social media in Hong Kong
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2023.2216720openalex-snapshot
Engender tolerance and participation in polarized gender issues: the mediating role of discussion in cross-cutting exposure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2023.2291588openalex-snapshot
The civility crisis: incivility, impoliteness and the descent of TV news debates in India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2018.1523464openalex-snapshot
How perceptions of incivility and social endorsement in online comments (Dis) encourage engagements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2021.1969429openalex-snapshot
Effects of online incivility and emotions toward in-groups on cross-cutting attention and political participation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2016.1201207openalex-snapshot
What is political incivility?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/07350198.2013.797879openalex-snapshot
Rhetorics of Civility: Theory, Pedagogy, and Practice in Speaking and Writing Textbooks
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2014.989971openalex-snapshot
Playing Nice: Modeling Civility in Online Political Discussions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2018.1532430openalex-snapshot
Socially Destructive? Effects of Negative and Hateful User Comments on Readers’ Donation Behavior toward Refugees and Homeless Persons
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1757368openalex-snapshot
Restrictive and Corrective Responses to Uncivil User Comments on News Websites: The Influence of Presumed Influence
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2024.2360596openalex-snapshot
Silencing Online Incivility: Examining the Effects of Impoliteness and Intolerance in Online Political Discussions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2021.1960153openalex-snapshot
Polarization and incivility in digital debates on women’s rights in Spain. Not just a matter of machismo
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193openalex-snapshot
Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2012.674617openalex-snapshot
Convergent Critical Rhetoric at the “Rally to Restore Sanity”: Exploring the Intersection of Rhetoric, Ethnography, and Documentary Production
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2017.1397038openalex-snapshot
The Role of Civility and Metacommunication in Facebook Discussions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10511431.2021.1936786openalex-snapshot
Viewing deliberation: daytime television’s public pedagogy of inclusion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2013.852640openalex-snapshot
Following the News? Reception of Uncivil Partisan Media and the Use of Incivility in Political Expression
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1355857openalex-snapshot
Platforms for Incivility: Examining Perceptions Across Different Media Formats
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2022.2137743openalex-snapshot
Damage Control: How Campaign Teams Interpret and Respond to Online Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2016.1128188openalex-snapshot
“Since this is the editorial section I intend to express my opinion”: Inequality and expressivity in letters to the editor
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2021.1938464openalex-snapshot
The strategic use of incivility in contemporary politics. The case of the 2018 Italian general election on Facebook
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.786543openalex-snapshot
Analysing legislative performance: a plebeian perspective
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1784950openalex-snapshot
The Influence of Anonymity and Incivility on Perceptions of User Comments on News Websites
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2023.2252396openalex-snapshot
Fuming Mad and Jumping with Joy: Emotional Responses to Uncivil and Post-Truth Communication by Populist and Non-Populist Politicians on Facebook During the COVID-19 Crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2313095openalex-snapshot
Examining the Dynamics of Uncivil Discourse Between Sub-National Political Officials and the Public on Twitter
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2018.1554492openalex-snapshot
When partisans see media coverage as hostile: The effect of uncivil online comments on hostile media effect
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2024.2400149openalex-snapshot
Cross-Cutting Exposure in Online News Comments: The Effects of Group Identification and Uncivil Discourse on Opinion Conformity and Expression
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2019.1621867openalex-snapshot
Advocating a preferred legislative style while constituting a bipartisan collective identity: Women senators’ strategic use of constitutive and polarizing rhetoric
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15512169.2013.835565openalex-snapshot
Who Taught You to Talk Like That?: The University and Online Political Discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1642926openalex-snapshot
Democratic professionals in civic life: cultivating civil discourse in community development
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2189152openalex-snapshot
The Management of Uncivil and Hateful User Comments in Austrian News Media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2227093openalex-snapshot
Building an ICCN Multimodal Classifier of Aggressive Political Debate Style: Towards a Computational Understanding of Candidate Performance Over Time
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2025.2551693openalex-snapshot
Classification bias of LLMs in detecting incivility towards female and male politicians in German social media discourse
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1715908openalex-snapshot
Cynicism, insults, and emotions in the 2016 U.S. presidential election: An affective intelligence framework
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2020.1858218openalex-snapshot
A wall of incivility? Public discourse and immigration in the 2016 U.S. Primaries
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2023.2202650openalex-snapshot
One way or another? Discussion disagreement and attitudinal homogeneity on social networking sites as pathways to polarization in Czechia
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2421390openalex-snapshot
The composition and amplification of mainstream political memes: evidence from 4 U.S. election cycles
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2020.1842771openalex-snapshot
Civility, gender, and gendered nationalism in the age of Trump
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1851279openalex-snapshot
Moderating Uncivil User Comments by Humans or Machines? The Effects of Moderation Agent on Perceptions of Bias and Credibility in News Content
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/27671127.2022.2049452openalex-snapshot
Un/civil demonstrators: Race and civility politics in the 1917 Silent Protest Parade
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/704097openalex-snapshot
Navigating the “Danger Zone”: Tone Policing and the Bounding of Civility in the Practice of Student Voice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/729957openalex-snapshot
Do We Have a Duty to Mitigate the Deterioration of Democratic Communication?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1086/735437openalex-snapshot
Incivility Does Not Exist: An Experimental Assessment on the Drivers of Incivility Perceptions and Their Effects on Candidate Evaluations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab018openalex-snapshot
Incivility as a Violation of Communication Norms—A Typology Based on Normative Expectations toward Political Communication
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw010openalex-snapshot
More than Mimicry? The Role of Anger in Uncivil Reactions to Elite Political Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac035openalex-snapshot
Different platforms, different uses: testing the effect of platforms and individual differences on perception of incivility and self-reported uncivil behavior
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmad018openalex-snapshot
Differential perceptions of and reactions to incivil and intolerant user comments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.001.0001openalex-snapshot
One Nation, Two Realities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0002openalex-snapshot
What Smarter People Have Said About Facts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Dueling Facts in Political Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0004openalex-snapshot
Dueling Facts in American Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Your Facts or Mine?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0006openalex-snapshot
The Psychology of Fact Perceptions II
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Polarized Leaders Versus Polarized Values
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0008openalex-snapshot
A Theory of Intuitive Epistemology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0009openalex-snapshot
The Roots of Certainty
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0010openalex-snapshot
The Democratic Consequences of Dueling Facts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0011openalex-snapshot
Disdain and Disengagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0012openalex-snapshot
Political Knowledge and Fractured Perceptions
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0013openalex-snapshot
Let Facts Be Submitted to a Candid World
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0014openalex-snapshot
Citizen Reponses to Fact-Checking
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677176.003.0015openalex-snapshot
Symmetry, Asymmetry, and Durability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Taking Aim at Attack Advertising
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Untangling the Impact of Negative Campaigning on Citizens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Data, Measurements, and Methodology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Citizens’ Tolerance of Negative Campaign Messages
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0004openalex-snapshot
An Examination of the Amount, Substance, and Tone of Negative Commercials in Senate Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Reactions to the Civility and Relevance of Negative Advertisements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Examining Citizens’ Impressions of Negativity During U.S. Senate Campaigns
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0007openalex-snapshot
How Negative Campaigning Influences Citizens’ Evaluations of Candidates and Likelihood of Voting
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.003.0008openalex-snapshot
The Consequences of Negative Campaigning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0001openalex-snapshot
Pretest/Posttest Questionnaire for 2014 CCES and ASU Module
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0002openalex-snapshot
Scripts of Negative Political Advertisements in 2014 CCES Survey Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0003openalex-snapshot
Questionnaire for ASU 2015 Online Survey Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0004openalex-snapshot
Text of Advertisements from 2015 ASU Online Survey Experiment
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0005openalex-snapshot
Coding Instructions for Original Content Analysis of Negative Advertisements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0006openalex-snapshot
Text of 14 Advertisements for ASU Focus Group Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0007openalex-snapshot
Focus Group Questionnaire Used to Assess Relevance and Civility of Advertisements
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0008openalex-snapshot
U.S. Senate Advertisements Examined in Emotions Focus Group Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190947569.005.0009openalex-snapshot
Questionnaire Employed in Emotions Focus Group Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.001.0001openalex-snapshot
Private Censorship
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0001openalex-snapshot
Free Speech and Non-State Censors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Self-Censorship, Self-Restraint, and the Ethics of Conversation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0003openalex-snapshot
Censorship and the Workplace
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0004openalex-snapshot
The “Old” Media: Censorship and Press Freedom
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0005openalex-snapshot
The “New” (Social) Media
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0006openalex-snapshot
Search and Monopoly
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197581902.003.0007openalex-snapshot
(Not So) Final Thoughts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0001openalex-snapshot
The Nasty Style of Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0002openalex-snapshot
A Theory of Nasty Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0003openalex-snapshot
From Insults to Incitement in U.S., Ukrainian, and Israeli Politics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0004openalex-snapshot
How Does the Public Respond to Nasty Rhetoric?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0005openalex-snapshot
Which Politicians Choose to Get Nasty and When?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0006openalex-snapshot
What Do the Experts Think about Nasty Politics?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0007openalex-snapshot
Nasty Politics and Its Implications for Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.003.0008openalex-snapshot
Prelude to War, a Coup and an Insurrection, and Concluding Thoughts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197679487.005.0001openalex-snapshot
Ukrainian Politics Overview
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190220945.013.35openalex-snapshot
An Ethics of Public Political Deliberation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197544891.013.1openalex-snapshot
Educating for Social Change
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa014openalex-snapshot
Can Social Media Incivility Induce Enthusiasm?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12541openalex-snapshot
Ad hominem rhetoric in scientific psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12191openalex-snapshot
Incivility and Political Identity on the Internet: Intergroup Factors as Predictors of Incivility in Discussions of News Online
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104openalex-snapshot
Online and Uncivil? Patterns and Determinants of Incivility in Newspaper Website Comments
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12259openalex-snapshot
A Bad Workman Blames His Tweets: The Consequences of Citizens' Uncivil Twitter Use When Interacting With Party Candidates
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12374openalex-snapshot
Dynamics of Polarizing Rhetoric in Congressional Tweets
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12370openalex-snapshot
Open to Debate: Reducing Polarization by Approaching Political Argument as Negotiation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12969openalex-snapshot
Uncivil yet persuasive? Testing the persuasiveness of political incivility and the moderating role of populist attitudes and personality traits
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12641openalex-snapshot
“The Power of the Presidency to Hurt”: The Indecorous Rhetoric of Donald J. Trump and the Rhetorical Norms of Democracy
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12758openalex-snapshot
Does President Trump's Outrageous Behavior Work?: Results from Two Randomized‐Controlled Trials
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12491openalex-snapshot
Communicating misogyny: An interdisciplinary research agenda for social psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13383openalex-snapshot
Civility norm violations and political accountability
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2022-0117openalex-snapshot
Incivility and Washington’s NFL Franchise: Exploring Uncivil Discourse in Sports Blog Comment Sections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3464327.3464332openalex-snapshot
Exploration of user interface mechanisms with affect labeling to enhance online discussion
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3551504.3551512openalex-snapshot
Social media deliberation: civil or uncivil, reasoned or unreasoned?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1145/3555545openalex-snapshot
How Background Images Impact Online Incivility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120920-084221openalex-snapshot
Law and/or/as Civility
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.11606/0103-2070.ts.2019.159680openalex-snapshot
La polarización de “La Manada”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213490695openalex-snapshot
From an Honored Value to a Harmful Choice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719890818openalex-snapshot
Exploring the Relationship Between Campaign Discourse on Facebook and the Public’s Comments: A Case Study of Incivility During the 2016 US Presidential Election
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00323217231178105openalex-snapshot
The Online Battlefield: How Conflict Frames in Political Advertisements Affect Political Participation in a Multiparty Context
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0093650217699933openalex-snapshot
Perceptions of Uncivil Discourse Online: An Examination of Types and Predictors
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921314openalex-snapshot
Beyond Incivility: Understanding Patterns of Uncivil and Intolerant Discourse in Online Political Talk
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221130837openalex-snapshot
Selective Avoidance: Understanding How Position and Proportion of Online Incivility Influence News Engagement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00936502221135694openalex-snapshot
How Contextual Features Shape Incivility Over Time: An Analysis of the Evolution and Determinants of Political Incivility in Televised Election Debates (1985–2019)
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611800501openalex-snapshot
A Typology for an Online Socrates Café
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/01634437251314351openalex-snapshot
Discourse, incivility and language aggression in social media debates on Biafra separatist agitation: Implications for Nigeria’s democratic future
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/02673231231217378openalex-snapshot
Communication and democratic erosion: The rise of illiberal public spheres
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/02673231241271008openalex-snapshot
What are the predictors of political incivility perceptions?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865519openalex-snapshot
Twitter, Incivility and “Everyday” Gendered Othering: An Analysis of Tweets Sent to UK Members of Parliament
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519837901openalex-snapshot
Civility, credibility, and health information: The impact of uncivil comments and source credibility on attitudes about vaccines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221078863openalex-snapshot
Online Incivility in the 2020 Congressional Elections
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241235901openalex-snapshot
Donate to help us fight back: Political fundraising and toxic rhetoric online
showing the first 200 of 279 · page through all 279
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.