On the public citation graph
Freeing Social and Medical Scientists from the Replication Crisis
0 signed · 137 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21011openalex-snapshot
The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23329openalex-snapshot
Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1320openalex-snapshot
Scale use and abuse: Towards best practices in the deployment of scales
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919openalex-snapshot
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/ueg2.12311openalex-snapshot
Search engine optimization for scientific publications: How one can find your needle in the haystack
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7158-6openalex-snapshot
Measurement for the Social Sciences: The C-OAR-SE Method and Why It Must Replace Psychometrics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_15openalex-snapshot
Preregistration: Definition, Advantages, Disadvantages, and How It Can Help Against Questionable Research Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_17openalex-snapshot
Assessing and Improving Robustness of Psychological Research Findings in Four Steps
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04968-2_3openalex-snapshot
Replicability and the Psychology of Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s00283-020-10037-7openalex-snapshot
A Replication Crisis in Mathematics?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04961-7openalex-snapshot
Crossing the Red Line? Empirical Evidence and Useful Recommendations on Questionable Research Practices among Business Scholars
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9456-7openalex-snapshot
Editorial: Evidence on Questionable Research Practices: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-023-09490-3openalex-snapshot
Metascience as a Scientific Social Movement
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1950-2openalex-snapshot
Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7openalex-snapshot
Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1985-3openalex-snapshot
Recent trends in academic journal growth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03348-1openalex-snapshot
Arbitrariness in the peer review process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04720-7openalex-snapshot
Do open science badges work? Estimating the effects of open science badges on an article’s social media attention and research impacts
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-019-03009-yopenalex-snapshot
Insights into relevant knowledge extraction techniques: a comprehensive review
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-013-0283-3openalex-snapshot
Epistemic dependence and collective scientific knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-015-9446-0openalex-snapshot
Playing with Data—Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things Right
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(90)90004-uopenalex-snapshot
Ethical codes are not enough
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2014.09.004openalex-snapshot
Unraveling scientific impact: Citation types in marketing journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.10.005openalex-snapshot
The Replication Recipe: What makes for a convincing replication?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.09.002openalex-snapshot
Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and subordinate attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors: A meta-analytic review of existing and new research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.006openalex-snapshot
Transparency and Reproducibility: Conceptualizing the Problem
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.007openalex-snapshot
Transparency and Reproducibility: Potential Solutions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.009openalex-snapshot
Pre-registration and Results-Free Review in Observational and Qualitative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108762519.010openalex-snapshot
Replication for Quantitative Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.50openalex-snapshot
What FiveThirtyEight Can Teach Us about Solving the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1005766631092openalex-snapshot
Professional Ethics and The Culture of Trust
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/14731-008openalex-snapshot
You get what you reward: A research-based approach to employee recognition.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015108openalex-snapshot
Shall we Really do it Again? The Powerful Concept of Replication is Neglected in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039400openalex-snapshot
Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000294openalex-snapshot
Heterogeneity in direct replications in psychology and its association with effect size.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000220openalex-snapshot
Measurement practices in large-scale replications: Insights from Many Labs 2.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000236openalex-snapshot
Psychological measurement and the replication crisis: Four sacred cows.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/cap0000326openalex-snapshot
I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029230openalex-snapshot
Man versus model of man: A rationale, plus some evidence, for a method of improving on clinical inferences.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000599openalex-snapshot
Enhancing predictive power by unamalgamating multi-item scales.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1037/tep0000322openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices among faculty and students in APA-accredited clinical and counseling psychology doctoral programs.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/526189aopenalex-snapshot
Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7612-457aopenalex-snapshot
Scientific literature: Information overload
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0399-zopenalex-snapshot
Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-52410-2openalex-snapshot
A Social Epistemology of Research Groups
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137openalex-snapshot
Inferential Statistics as Descriptive Statistics: There Is No Replication Crisis if We Don’t Expect Replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.853582openalex-snapshot
Announcing Open Science Badges and Reaching for the Sky
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1289361openalex-snapshot
Addressing the “Replication Crisis”: Using Original Studies to Design Replication Studies with Appropriate Statistical Power
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2017.1281778openalex-snapshot
Construct Measurement in Advertising Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2017.1350581openalex-snapshot
Can “Results Blind Manuscript Evaluation” Assuage “Publication Bias”?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.1990.11107153openalex-snapshot
Deception in Advertising: A Proposed Complex of Definitions for Researchers, Lawyers, and Regulators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.794872openalex-snapshot
Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust: Managing Dependence in Scientific Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2014.950253openalex-snapshot
Commentary: Perverse Incentives or Rotten Apples?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2018.1490707openalex-snapshot
An a priori solution to the replication crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.692215openalex-snapshot
Scientific Utopia: I. Opening Scientific Communication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840x.2012.704802openalex-snapshot
Missteps on the Road to Scientific Utopia
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2023.2175894openalex-snapshot
How and when ranking-based recommendations induce higher willingness-to-pay
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2015.1096334openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices in Experimental Communication Research: A Systematic Analysis From 1980 to 2013
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2022.2048960openalex-snapshot
Are structural equation models theories and does it matter?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/208579openalex-snapshot
Brand Choice Behavior as a Function of Information Load: Replication and Extension
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1087/20100308openalex-snapshot
Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0002openalex-snapshot
Improving Research Transparency in the Social Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190938550.003.0003openalex-snapshot
What Can We Do About Our (Untrustworthy) Literature?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198799887.001.0001openalex-snapshot
The Overproduction of Truth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561111111299openalex-snapshot
Reflections on assessing academic quality in marketing, and the UK REF
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599810207944openalex-snapshot
Fear as a strategy: effects and impact within the organization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579810231420openalex-snapshot
Accounting and management research: passwords from the gatekeepers
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/jd-07-2012-0082openalex-snapshot
Interestingness and the essence of citation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12576openalex-snapshot
When open data closes the door: A critical examination of the past, present and the potential future for open data guidelines in journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12211openalex-snapshot
Why successful replications across contexts and Operationalizations might not be good for theory building or testing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12296openalex-snapshot
Generalizing across auxiliary, statistical, and inferential assumptions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56openalex-snapshot
The Matthew Effect in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716openalex-snapshot
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad7243openalex-snapshot
Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj5865openalex-snapshot
Unreliable social science research gets more attention than solid studies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1145/3530013openalex-snapshot
Augmenting Scientific Creativity with an Analogical Search Engine
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836openalex-snapshot
Psychology's Renaissance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00188openalex-snapshot
Research coauthorship 1900–2020: Continuous, universal, and ongoing expansion
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/002224298705100406openalex-snapshot
Evaluating and Improving Argument-Centered Works in Marketing
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/007327538101900102openalex-snapshot
The Place of the ‘Core-Set’ in Modern Science: Social Contingency with Methodological Propriety in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011openalex-snapshot
The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315619011openalex-snapshot
Questions About Questionable Research Practices in the Field of Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509openalex-snapshot
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611430953openalex-snapshot
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354311429996openalex-snapshot
The role of auxiliary assumptions for the validity of manipulations and measures
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354314529616openalex-snapshot
What can recent replication failures tell us about the theoretical commitments of psychology?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211046508openalex-snapshot
Psychology Exceptionalism and the Multiple Discovery of the Replication Crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198113483139openalex-snapshot
Validity and Reliability Reporting Practices in the Field of Health Education and Behavior
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264614552421openalex-snapshot
Publication Pressure and Scientific Misconduct in Medical Scientists
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/15562646211018916openalex-snapshot
Towards a Research Agenda for Promoting Responsible Research Practices
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612463401openalex-snapshot
Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613514450openalex-snapshot
The Alleged Crisis and the Illusion of Exact Replication
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619850561openalex-snapshot
Scientific Utopia III: Crowdsourcing Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916211041116openalex-snapshot
Kinds of Replication: Examining the Meanings of “Conceptual Replication” and “Direct Replication”
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016120980562openalex-snapshot
Publish or be ethical? Publishing pressure and scientific misconduct in research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225openalex-snapshot
Many Labs 2: Investigating Variation in Replicability Across Samples and Settings
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919882903openalex-snapshot
Hidden Invalidity Among 15 Commonly Used Measures in Social and Personality Psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393openalex-snapshot
Measurement Schmeasurement: Questionable Measurement Practices and How to Avoid Them
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.12037.1openalex-snapshot
A multi-disciplinary perspective on emergent and future innovations in peer review [version 1; referees: 2 approved with reservations]
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.22.2.151.16038openalex-snapshot
Editorial: Compartmentalized Reviews and Other Initiatives: Should Marketing Scientists Review Manuscripts in Consumer Behavior?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675openalex-snapshot
The Assessment of Science: The Relative Merits of Post-Publication Review, the Impact Factor, and the Number of Citations
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124openalex-snapshot
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738openalex-snapshot
How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010068openalex-snapshot
“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200303openalex-snapshot
Questionable research practices in ecology and evolution
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263023openalex-snapshot
Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2511364openalex-snapshot
Unraveling Scientific Impact: Citation Types in Marketing Journals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2964565openalex-snapshot
The Life Cycle of Scholarly Articles Across Fields of Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/2232499openalex-snapshot
Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3491374openalex-snapshot
Order Maintenance Reconsidered: Moving beyond Strong Causal Reasoning
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2501/ijmr-54-1-129-145openalex-snapshot
Adjusting Self-Reported Attitudinal Data for Mischievous Respondents
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621openalex-snapshot
Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831openalex-snapshot
How to Crack Pre-registration: Toward Transparent and Open Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01398-0openalex-snapshot
Thinking twice about sum scores
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003390633-6openalex-snapshot
How Management Academics Have Locked Themselves in an Iron Cage
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.51845/34s.1.18openalex-snapshot
Citations and Gamed Metrics: Academic Integrity Lost
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5840/ijap19951019openalex-snapshot
On Foundations Research in the Social Sciences
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.