On the public citation graph
I know it’s bad, but I have been pressured into it: Questionable research practices among psychology students in Canada.
0 signed · 38 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What points at this work
Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-026-00589-wopenalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices: A Principled Classification and Ranking Based on Survey Data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-025-01266-6openalex-snapshot
“Sexuality Assessment Beyond Sexual Function: an Integrative Review of the Available Instruments in Brazilian Portuguese”
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2026.102747openalex-snapshot
Confronting the infodemic in clinical psychology: Clinical research responsibilities in an era of proliferation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000569openalex-snapshot
Fachgruppe Biologische Psychologie und Neuropsychologie. Mehr als nur fragwürdig: Reproduzierbarkeit und Open Science in der Lehre aus Sicht der Biologischen Psychologie und Neuropsychologie
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2026.2697184openalex-snapshot
Supplementing Remedies to the Replication Crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2026.2659673openalex-snapshot
Identificatory underpinnings of ethical research behavior for graduate students: Evidence from a baseline sample of a university research ethics training program
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2113771openalex-snapshot
Exploratory hypothesis tests can be more compelling than confirmatory hypothesis tests
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2248765openalex-snapshot
UK Psychology PhD researchers’ knowledge, perceptions, and experiences of open science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/2833373x.2024.2376046openalex-snapshot
The benefits of preregistration and Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/s1474-787120250000037001openalex-snapshot
The Null Hypothesis Statistical Testing Paradigm Undermines Knowledge Acquisition in Management Accounting Research: It Needs to Be Abandoned
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00986283221100276openalex-snapshot
What do Incoming University Students Believe About Open Science Practices in Psychology?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/02704676221126388openalex-snapshot
Process and Bureaucracy: Scientific Reform as Civilisation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1214/23-sts904openalex-snapshot
Replication Success Under Questionable Research Practices—a Simulation Study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0355938openalex-snapshot
The effect of manuscript characteristics on quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1523/eneuro.0017-22.2022openalex-snapshot
Questionable Research Practices, Low Statistical Power, and Other Obstacles to Replicability: Why Preclinical Neuroscience Research Would Benefit from Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4898637openalex-snapshot
Freeing Social and Medical Scientists from the Replication Crisis
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.21608/aijli.2022.213328openalex-snapshot
العلم المفتوح: ماهيته، وفلسفته، وممارساته
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/7dc6aopenalex-snapshot
Quality assessment of scientific manuscripts in peer review and education
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/cwyk8openalex-snapshot
Assessing QRPs and RRPs in Psychology Masters’ Theses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/6xzaw_v1openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/s4b65openalex-snapshot
Replication success under questionable research practices – a simulation study
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2qx6mopenalex-snapshot
Undergraduate Psychology Students’ Perceptions of Open Research: The Relationship Between Statistics Understanding, Attitudes, and Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ah9wb_v1openalex-snapshot
A brief review of research that questions the impact of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ah9wb_v3openalex-snapshot
A brief review of research that questions the impact of questionable research practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dqap7openalex-snapshot
The Benefits of Preregistration and Registered Reports
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.32872/spb.9411openalex-snapshot
Evading open science: The black box of student data collection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860740openalex-snapshot
What is critical metascience and why is it important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/bs16010110openalex-snapshot
Assessing Questionable and Responsible Research Practices in Psychology Master’s Theses
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02172-8openalex-snapshot
First steps into the pupillometry multiverse of developmental science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.56754/2810-6598.2026.0056openalex-snapshot
Zombie papers in social psychology: A look into Smeesters’ seven retracted articles and their citations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.57874/axc8-vs07openalex-snapshot
How can we overcome the barriers to researchers producing high quality, open research?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/2w1s0-6rq05openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/bhtkz-ypb51openalex-snapshot
What is Critical Metascience and Why is it Important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/fbcmj-2f267openalex-snapshot
A Brief Review of Research that Questions the Impact of Questionable Research Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.70675/8561e569z8583z4971z8270zfcd940878501openalex-snapshot
Accompagner les formateurs de formations professionnelles à utiliser des plateformes pédagogiques collaboratives : gamification, engagement et créativité
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.