On the public citation graph
Is Novel Research Always Risky?
0 signed · 63 inferred · view as graph
Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.
Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the
claims that are yours.
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a
known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped
badge you can embed.
What this work says
Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3145openalex-snapshot
Reliance on science: Worldwide front‐page patent citations to scientific articles
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28061-1openalex-snapshot
Big Scientific Data Management
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27922-5_23openalex-snapshot
The Architecture of Complexity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9521-1_16openalex-snapshot
Scientific Discovery and the Psychology of Problem Solving
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9openalex-snapshot
Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2024.101564openalex-snapshot
Comparing patent in-text and front-page references to science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.05.002openalex-snapshot
Complexity, networks and knowledge flow
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.007openalex-snapshot
Creativity in scientific teams: Unpacking novelty and impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006openalex-snapshot
Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009openalex-snapshot
NK model as a representation of innovative search
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.019openalex-snapshot
Scientific novelty and technological impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104156openalex-snapshot
Technological complexity and economic growth of regions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104450openalex-snapshot
The new paradigm of economic complexity
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104706openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty and risk-taking in science: Meaning, measurement and management in peer review of research proposals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104707openalex-snapshot
The subjective expected utility approach and a framework for defining project risk in terms of novelty and feasibility – A response to Franzoni and Stephan (2023), ‘uncertainty and risk-taking in science’
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105075openalex-snapshot
Unexpectedness in medical research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(00)00135-9openalex-snapshot
Technology as a complex adaptive system: evidence from patent data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2918openalex-snapshot
Network medicine: a network-based approach to human disease
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01957-xopenalex-snapshot
Conceptual structure and the growth of scientific knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-xopenalex-snapshot
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-020-00275-1openalex-snapshot
Economic complexity theory and applications
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1404402111openalex-snapshot
Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509757112openalex-snapshot
Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910160117openalex-snapshot
NIH funding and the pursuit of edge science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590500141453openalex-snapshot
Technological innovation and complexity theory
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/733398openalex-snapshot
Scooped! Estimating Rewards for Priority in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2015.0346openalex-snapshot
Combination of Tigecycline and Levofloxacin for Successful Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia Caused by New Delhi Metallo-β-Lactamase-1-Producing Raoultella planticola
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cis857openalex-snapshot
Clinical Outcomes With Extended or Continuous Versus Short-term Intravenous Infusion of Carbapenems and Piperacillin/Tazobactam: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkr262openalex-snapshot
Discovery research: the scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198781806.003.0008openalex-snapshot
An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaf010openalex-snapshot
Race to the Bottom: Competition and Quality in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw040openalex-snapshot
Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth*
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy034openalex-snapshot
Public R&D Investments and Private-sector Patenting: Evidence from NIH Funding Rules
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab031openalex-snapshot
Does It Pay to Do Novel Science? The Selectivity Patterns in Science Funding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00531.xopenalex-snapshot
The Burden of Knowledge and the “Death of the Renaissance Man”: Is Innovation Getting Harder?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2011.00140.xopenalex-snapshot
Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay7323openalex-snapshot
Science quality and the value of inventions
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474openalex-snapshot
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9527openalex-snapshot
The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588openalex-snapshot
How Much Should We Trust Differences-In-Differences Estimates?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01561openalex-snapshot
Beyond Citations: Measuring Novel Scientific Ideas and their Impact in Publication Text
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601618openalex-snapshot
Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161574openalex-snapshot
Does Science Advance One Funeral at a Time?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2285openalex-snapshot
Looking Across and Looking Beyond the Knowledge Frontier: Intellectual Distance, Novelty, and Resource Allocation in Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2021.4107openalex-snapshot
Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.7.934openalex-snapshot
Adaptation on Rugged Landscapes
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0829openalex-snapshot
Search on Rugged Landscapes: An Experimental Study
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0254034openalex-snapshot
Measuring novelty in science with word embedding
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2193068openalex-snapshot
Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation and Growth
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2710572openalex-snapshot
Bias Against Novelty in Science: A Cautionary Tale for Users of Bibliometric Indicators
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4649716openalex-snapshot
Scoring and Funding Breakthrough Ideas: Evidence from a Global Pharmaceutical Company
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4769282openalex-snapshot
Greenlighting Innovative Projects: How Evaluation Structure Shapes the Perceived Feasibility of Early-Stage Ideas
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.608702openalex-snapshot
The Burden of Knowledge and the 'Death of the Renaissance Man': Is Innovation Getting Harder?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/1053493openalex-snapshot
Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.2307/3105094openalex-snapshot
Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3152/147154300781781805openalex-snapshot
Research excellence and patented innovation
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w28562openalex-snapshot
Uncertainty and Risk-Taking in Science: Meaning, Measurement and Management in Peer Review of Research Proposals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w30320openalex-snapshot
Do Funding Agencies Select and Enable Risky Research: Evidence from ERC Using Novelty as a Proxy of Risk Taking
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3386/w33495openalex-snapshot
Does Peer Review Penalize Scientific Risk Taking? Evidence from NIH Grant Renewals
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-4732openalex-snapshot
The gifts of Athena: historical origins of the knowledge economy
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity
Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers
publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free
and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.