On the public citation graph

Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?

0 signed · 78 inferred · view as graph

Inferred edges come from two machine sources: sweeps of open repository metadata (mostly SSRN and Zenodo), and a bulk OpenAlex citation snapshot. Every row below is labelled with the one it came from. Neither is a complete citation index — absence here is not evidence of absence.

Is this your work? Sign in with ORCID and put your name on the claims that are yours.
Claim with ORCID
Reference health. See whether every reference in this work resolves to a known work and none has been retracted — and get a dated CiteStamped badge you can embed.
See reference health

What this work says

Outgoing claims: the papers this work cites, builds on, or argues with.

inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2openalex-snapshot
Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-018-9538-7openalex-snapshot
The Bermuda Triangle: The Pragmatics, Policies, and Principles for Data Sharing in the History of the Human Genome Project
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-013-0119-3openalex-snapshot
The creative industry of integrative systems biology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-019-0269-1openalex-snapshot
The limits of replicability
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.08.003openalex-snapshot
Repertoires: A post-Kuhnian perspective on scientific change and collaborative research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511802683openalex-snapshot
Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2022.45openalex-snapshot
Open Science and Epistemic Diversity: Friends or Foes?
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/694155openalex-snapshot
Phenomena and Objects of Research in the Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1086/705451openalex-snapshot
Why Replication Is Overrated
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw036openalex-snapshot
Beyond the digital divide: Towards a situated approach to open data
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1108/s0743-41542018000036b009openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Reproducibility as a Criterion for Research Quality
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12633openalex-snapshot
Philosophy of science and the replicability crisis
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.fbb1bdd6openalex-snapshot
Data Science in Times of Pan(dem)ic
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243916672071openalex-snapshot
How Does One “Open” Science? Questions of Value in Biological Research
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467616668760openalex-snapshot
How Do Scientists Define Openness? Exploring the Relationship Between Open Science Policies and Research Practice
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp4808openalex-snapshot
Making Open Science Work for Science and Society
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.1998.0030openalex-snapshot
In and About the World: Philosophical Studies of Science and Technology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691187013openalex-snapshot
The Fate of Knowledge
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2019.00043openalex-snapshot
Open Science, Open Data, and Open Scholarship: European Policies to Make Science Fit for the Twenty-First Century
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219167openalex-snapshot
Evidential Reasoning in Archaeology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2017-032openalex-snapshot
Global Data Quality Assessment and the Situated Nature of “Best” Research Practices in Biology
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.54677/mnmh8546openalex-snapshot
UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science
inferredcites →https://doi.org/10.7557/19.5294openalex-snapshot
The Future of Open Science

What points at this work

Incoming claims: where this work appears in other papers’ reference lists and arguments.

inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4706575openalex-extracted
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-18509-9_3openalex-snapshot
Evaluating Genomic Language Models: Experimental Validation, Multi-Omics Integration, and Ethical-Legal Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-29473-9_1openalex-snapshot
Polycentric Science Diplomacy in an Age of Disruption
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-29575-0_3openalex-snapshot
From Principles to Practice: FAIR Data and the Infrastructural Turn in Social Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09590-2openalex-snapshot
Bio-Ontologies, Epistemic Diversity, and Epistemic Justice: Data Curation and the Case Against ‘Excellence’
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-025-09618-7openalex-snapshot
The Library and the Database: Contrasting Expectations in Two Imaginaries for the Research Literature
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-05219-9openalex-snapshot
Relinquishing experimental control to improve translation
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-025-00736-0openalex-snapshot
Let us be Clear: Why and how to Demonstrate data and Methods Transparency in Nonprofit Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-025-00685-xopenalex-snapshot
Reflections on interdisciplinary research in practice: Epistemological conflicts
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-026-00727-yopenalex-snapshot
Reproducibility, questionable research practices and ethico-epistemic trade-offs in animal-based biomedicine
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2026.123638openalex-snapshot
Scientific publishing and diversity in science: geographical bias of articles published in Animal Behaviour
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103576openalex-snapshot
From inequalities to epistemic innovation: Insights from open science hardware projects in Latin America
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103655openalex-snapshot
Participatory practices and transforming environmental research in the Anthropocene
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2026.101413openalex-snapshot
Venturing into the noise: Discoverability practices of open scholarly resources on a national digital library
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/can.2024.44openalex-snapshot
The Value of Openness in Open Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1017/cfc.2026.10022openalex-snapshot
AI, open science, and the extraction imperative: A situated approach to the normativities of open research data
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00179-1openalex-snapshot
A manifesto for a globally diverse, equitable, and inclusive open science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2258831openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Inclusion as the Key to Benefiting from Cognitive Diversity in Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2475460openalex-snapshot
Critically Unpacking the Concept of Equity for Open Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2026.2669557openalex-snapshot
Epistemic Disadvantage in Open Science Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2026.2669558openalex-snapshot
More Than a NASA Badge: MetaDocencia and Capacity Building for Open Science Communities in Latin America
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2026.2669567openalex-snapshot
Global Citizen Science as a Source of Epistemic Diversity: The Case of eBird India
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2193694openalex-snapshot
How (not) to be held accountable in research: A reply to my critics
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad073openalex-snapshot
Value dissonance in research(er) assessment: individual and perceived institutional priorities in review, promotion, and tenure
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240857openalex-snapshot
Towards an inclusive Open Science: examining EDI and public participation in policy documents across Europe and the Americas
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/joe-09-2025-0124openalex-snapshot
Examining diversity, equity and inclusion policies in academic publishing through a decolonial lens
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-07-2025-0241openalex-snapshot
Professional work in an era of FAIR data sharing: vulnerabilities, negotiations and sacrifice
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2024-0057openalex-snapshot
Replication: A Critique and Overview for Kinesiology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1162/posc.a.7openalex-snapshot
Studying Individuality in Behavioral Ecology: Overcoming Epistemic Challenges
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/00375497261444678openalex-snapshot
Advancing reproducibility and replicability in simulation: Challenges and opportunities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1177/10892680261421875openalex-snapshot
The Recurrence of Fundamental Questions: A Historical and Philosophical Analysis of Major Disciplinary Crises in Psychology
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311493openalex-snapshot
An analysis of the effects of sharing research data, code, and preprints on citations
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15406/jbmoa.11.3openalex-snapshot
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15406/jbmoa.2023.11.00356openalex-snapshot
Advancing microbial insights: bridging academia, industry, and society
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.15626/mp.2023.3797openalex-snapshot
Responsible assessment of what research? Beware of epistemic diversity!
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-3-70-87openalex-snapshot
Advantages and challenges to open science practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.31222/osf.io/nt96qopenalex-snapshot
Establishing trust in automated reasoning
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1860740openalex-snapshot
What is critical metascience and why is it important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3390/ani13213358openalex-snapshot
A Framework for Transparency in Precision Livestock Farming
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36850/f4c4-4a38openalex-snapshot
How to Get There From Here? Barriers and Enablers on the Road Towards Reproducibility in Research
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.36850/mr4openalex-snapshot
Questionable Metascience Practices
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3897/rio.8.e89980openalex-snapshot
Sharing the Recipe: Reproducibility and Replicability in Research Across Disciplines
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.3998/jep.7845openalex-snapshot
Open at the Level of (Para)text: Critical Intertextuality and Discursive Notation as Open Research Practices in the Humanities
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/bdh.nopenalex-snapshot
Open Science – eine Frage der Wissenschaftskultur
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-029openalex-snapshot
Unrestricted Versus Regulated Open Data Governance: A Bibliometric Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleotide Sequence Databases
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-034openalex-snapshot
Rethinking Data Management Planning: Introducing Research Output Management Planning (ROMPi) Approach
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-015openalex-snapshot
Open Science, Health Data and Epistemic Harms: A Multidisciplinary Reflection
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2026-021openalex-snapshot
Universal Mandates vs. Contextual Realities: A Scoping Review of Ethical Tensions and Power Asymmetries in Global Open Science
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/03g1k-nc619openalex-snapshot
A Modular Approach to Research Quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/93m4p-sde68openalex-snapshot
Let's Talk about Science Reform! Introducing a Workshop on Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigating the Open Science Movement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/bhtkz-ypb51openalex-snapshot
What is Critical Metascience and Why is it Important?
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/yaj6t-tcx28openalex-snapshot
A Modular Approach to Research Quality
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.59350/zcfyc-00d92openalex-snapshot
Let's Talk about Science Reform! Introducing a Workshop on Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to Investigating the Open Science Movement
inferred← citeshttps://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.20502openalex-snapshot
A survey of how biology researchers assess credibility when serving on grant and hiring committees
showing the first 54 of 55 · page through all 55
Editorial review for independent work. ICSAC — the Institute for Complexity Science and Advanced Computing — runs a structured editorial panel for researchers publishing outside journals, and publishes on CiteStamp rails. Submission is free and goes through ORCID: icsacinstitute.org/submit.